Cargando…

Review/perspective on hysterical paralysis: A diagnosis of exclusion for spinal surgeons

BACKGROUND: Hysterical paralysis (HP) and/or conversion disorders (CD) are diagnoses of exclusion for spine surgeons. Before assigning this diagnosis to a patient, they must first undergo a full neurodiagnostic evaluation (i.e., X-rays, MR, CT/Myelo-CT) to rule out organic spinal pathology. Here, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Epstein, Nancy E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Scientific Scholar 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9062961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509596
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_278_2022
_version_ 1784699065494142976
author Epstein, Nancy E.
author_facet Epstein, Nancy E.
author_sort Epstein, Nancy E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hysterical paralysis (HP) and/or conversion disorders (CD) are diagnoses of exclusion for spine surgeons. Before assigning this diagnosis to a patient, they must first undergo a full neurodiagnostic evaluation (i.e., X-rays, MR, CT/Myelo-CT) to rule out organic spinal pathology. Here, we reviewed select articles highlighting how to differentiate HP/CD patients from those with spinal disease. METHODS: Several case studies and small series of patients with HP/CD were included in our analysis. Notably, prior to being assigned the diagnoses of HP/CD, patients had to first undergo X-ray, MR, CT, and/or Myelo-CT evaluations to rule out spinal disorders; typically, their neurodiagnostic studies were normal. RESULTS: Patients with HP/CD often presented with varying clinical complaints of motor paralysis despite intact reflexes, normal sensory examinations, and lack of sphincter disturbance (i.e. intact rectal tone). Further, go and nogo functional MRI (fMRI) examinations demonstrated inconsistencies in areas of brain activation for patients with HP/CD complaints. CONCLUSIONS: HP/CD are diagnoses of exclusion, and patients should first undergo a full panel of neurodiagnostic studies to rule out organic spinal disease. While those with HP/CD should not have unnecessary operations, those with real “surgical pathology” should have appropriate spine surgery performed in a timely fashion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9062961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Scientific Scholar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90629612022-05-03 Review/perspective on hysterical paralysis: A diagnosis of exclusion for spinal surgeons Epstein, Nancy E. Surg Neurol Int Review Article BACKGROUND: Hysterical paralysis (HP) and/or conversion disorders (CD) are diagnoses of exclusion for spine surgeons. Before assigning this diagnosis to a patient, they must first undergo a full neurodiagnostic evaluation (i.e., X-rays, MR, CT/Myelo-CT) to rule out organic spinal pathology. Here, we reviewed select articles highlighting how to differentiate HP/CD patients from those with spinal disease. METHODS: Several case studies and small series of patients with HP/CD were included in our analysis. Notably, prior to being assigned the diagnoses of HP/CD, patients had to first undergo X-ray, MR, CT, and/or Myelo-CT evaluations to rule out spinal disorders; typically, their neurodiagnostic studies were normal. RESULTS: Patients with HP/CD often presented with varying clinical complaints of motor paralysis despite intact reflexes, normal sensory examinations, and lack of sphincter disturbance (i.e. intact rectal tone). Further, go and nogo functional MRI (fMRI) examinations demonstrated inconsistencies in areas of brain activation for patients with HP/CD complaints. CONCLUSIONS: HP/CD are diagnoses of exclusion, and patients should first undergo a full panel of neurodiagnostic studies to rule out organic spinal disease. While those with HP/CD should not have unnecessary operations, those with real “surgical pathology” should have appropriate spine surgery performed in a timely fashion. Scientific Scholar 2022-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9062961/ /pubmed/35509596 http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_278_2022 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Surgical Neurology International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Epstein, Nancy E.
Review/perspective on hysterical paralysis: A diagnosis of exclusion for spinal surgeons
title Review/perspective on hysterical paralysis: A diagnosis of exclusion for spinal surgeons
title_full Review/perspective on hysterical paralysis: A diagnosis of exclusion for spinal surgeons
title_fullStr Review/perspective on hysterical paralysis: A diagnosis of exclusion for spinal surgeons
title_full_unstemmed Review/perspective on hysterical paralysis: A diagnosis of exclusion for spinal surgeons
title_short Review/perspective on hysterical paralysis: A diagnosis of exclusion for spinal surgeons
title_sort review/perspective on hysterical paralysis: a diagnosis of exclusion for spinal surgeons
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9062961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509596
http://dx.doi.org/10.25259/SNI_278_2022
work_keys_str_mv AT epsteinnancye reviewperspectiveonhystericalparalysisadiagnosisofexclusionforspinalsurgeons