Cargando…

Different Radiological Criteria for Early Tumor Response Evaluation in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Anti-PD-1 Antibody Plus Bevacizumab

PURPOSE: We aimed to compare different radiological criteria in evaluating the early tumor response of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) treated with an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody plus bevacizumab. METHOD: From October 2018 to January 2020, 58 patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Ying, Yang, Yi, Li, Lu, Zhou, Aiping, Zhang, Hongmei, Ye, Feng, Zhang, Wen, Zhao, Hong, Zhao, Xinming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35515116
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.848129
_version_ 1784699082092052480
author Xu, Ying
Yang, Yi
Li, Lu
Zhou, Aiping
Zhang, Hongmei
Ye, Feng
Zhang, Wen
Zhao, Hong
Zhao, Xinming
author_facet Xu, Ying
Yang, Yi
Li, Lu
Zhou, Aiping
Zhang, Hongmei
Ye, Feng
Zhang, Wen
Zhao, Hong
Zhao, Xinming
author_sort Xu, Ying
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We aimed to compare different radiological criteria in evaluating the early tumor response of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) treated with an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody plus bevacizumab. METHOD: From October 2018 to January 2020, 58 patients [49 (84.5%) men, age = 55.2 ± 10.6 years] receiving both anti-PD-1 antibody and bevacizumab were retrospectively included. Pre- and the first posttreatment contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) scans were performed in all patients. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), modified RECIST (mRECIST), Choi, and the revised Choi (rChoi) criteria were applied to evaluate tumor response. The endpoint event was defined as overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Six (10.3%), 9 (15.5%), 30 (51.7%), and 12 (20.7%) patients were diagnosed as responders by RECIST 1.1, mRECIST, Choi, and rChoi, respectively. The RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST criteria failed to correlate the evaluation categories with OS (p = 0.130 and 0.253, respectively), while both Choi and rChoi significantly correlated with OS (p = 0.002 and 0.006, respectively). Among the four criteria, only those patients identified as responders by Choi (p = 0.0005) and rChoi (p = 0.005) showed significantly better OS than the non-responders. The cumulative 1- and 2-year OS rates by Choi were 93.3% and 79.8% in responders and 69.3% and 30.3% in non-responders, respectively; these rates were 100.0% and 100.0% in responders and 74.9% and 43.1% in non-responders by rChoi, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of early tumor response using Choi and rChoi instead of RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST significantly correlated with the OS of patients with uHCC treated with an anti-PD-1 antibody plus bevacizumab. Moreover, patients identified as responders by Choi and rChoi showed significantly better OS than the non-responders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9063040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90630402022-05-04 Different Radiological Criteria for Early Tumor Response Evaluation in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Anti-PD-1 Antibody Plus Bevacizumab Xu, Ying Yang, Yi Li, Lu Zhou, Aiping Zhang, Hongmei Ye, Feng Zhang, Wen Zhao, Hong Zhao, Xinming Front Oncol Oncology PURPOSE: We aimed to compare different radiological criteria in evaluating the early tumor response of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) treated with an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody plus bevacizumab. METHOD: From October 2018 to January 2020, 58 patients [49 (84.5%) men, age = 55.2 ± 10.6 years] receiving both anti-PD-1 antibody and bevacizumab were retrospectively included. Pre- and the first posttreatment contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CE-CT) scans were performed in all patients. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), modified RECIST (mRECIST), Choi, and the revised Choi (rChoi) criteria were applied to evaluate tumor response. The endpoint event was defined as overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Six (10.3%), 9 (15.5%), 30 (51.7%), and 12 (20.7%) patients were diagnosed as responders by RECIST 1.1, mRECIST, Choi, and rChoi, respectively. The RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST criteria failed to correlate the evaluation categories with OS (p = 0.130 and 0.253, respectively), while both Choi and rChoi significantly correlated with OS (p = 0.002 and 0.006, respectively). Among the four criteria, only those patients identified as responders by Choi (p = 0.0005) and rChoi (p = 0.005) showed significantly better OS than the non-responders. The cumulative 1- and 2-year OS rates by Choi were 93.3% and 79.8% in responders and 69.3% and 30.3% in non-responders, respectively; these rates were 100.0% and 100.0% in responders and 74.9% and 43.1% in non-responders by rChoi, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of early tumor response using Choi and rChoi instead of RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST significantly correlated with the OS of patients with uHCC treated with an anti-PD-1 antibody plus bevacizumab. Moreover, patients identified as responders by Choi and rChoi showed significantly better OS than the non-responders. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9063040/ /pubmed/35515116 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.848129 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xu, Yang, Li, Zhou, Zhang, Ye, Zhang, Zhao and Zhao https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Xu, Ying
Yang, Yi
Li, Lu
Zhou, Aiping
Zhang, Hongmei
Ye, Feng
Zhang, Wen
Zhao, Hong
Zhao, Xinming
Different Radiological Criteria for Early Tumor Response Evaluation in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Anti-PD-1 Antibody Plus Bevacizumab
title Different Radiological Criteria for Early Tumor Response Evaluation in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Anti-PD-1 Antibody Plus Bevacizumab
title_full Different Radiological Criteria for Early Tumor Response Evaluation in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Anti-PD-1 Antibody Plus Bevacizumab
title_fullStr Different Radiological Criteria for Early Tumor Response Evaluation in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Anti-PD-1 Antibody Plus Bevacizumab
title_full_unstemmed Different Radiological Criteria for Early Tumor Response Evaluation in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Anti-PD-1 Antibody Plus Bevacizumab
title_short Different Radiological Criteria for Early Tumor Response Evaluation in Patients With Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Anti-PD-1 Antibody Plus Bevacizumab
title_sort different radiological criteria for early tumor response evaluation in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with anti-pd-1 antibody plus bevacizumab
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35515116
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.848129
work_keys_str_mv AT xuying differentradiologicalcriteriaforearlytumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomatreatedwithantipd1antibodyplusbevacizumab
AT yangyi differentradiologicalcriteriaforearlytumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomatreatedwithantipd1antibodyplusbevacizumab
AT lilu differentradiologicalcriteriaforearlytumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomatreatedwithantipd1antibodyplusbevacizumab
AT zhouaiping differentradiologicalcriteriaforearlytumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomatreatedwithantipd1antibodyplusbevacizumab
AT zhanghongmei differentradiologicalcriteriaforearlytumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomatreatedwithantipd1antibodyplusbevacizumab
AT yefeng differentradiologicalcriteriaforearlytumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomatreatedwithantipd1antibodyplusbevacizumab
AT zhangwen differentradiologicalcriteriaforearlytumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomatreatedwithantipd1antibodyplusbevacizumab
AT zhaohong differentradiologicalcriteriaforearlytumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomatreatedwithantipd1antibodyplusbevacizumab
AT zhaoxinming differentradiologicalcriteriaforearlytumorresponseevaluationinpatientswithunresectablehepatocellularcarcinomatreatedwithantipd1antibodyplusbevacizumab