Cargando…

Smartphone-based mobile applications for adverse drug reactions reporting: global status and country experience

BACKGROUND: Smartphone technology can support paperless reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The aims of this study were to systematically assess smartphone ADR-reporting applications, understand their qualitative and quantitative impact on ADR reporting, and garner key lessons from owners an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fukushima, Ayako, Iessa, Noha, Balakrishnan, Madhava Ram, Pal, Shanthi Narayan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35501745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01832-7
_version_ 1784699086391214080
author Fukushima, Ayako
Iessa, Noha
Balakrishnan, Madhava Ram
Pal, Shanthi Narayan
author_facet Fukushima, Ayako
Iessa, Noha
Balakrishnan, Madhava Ram
Pal, Shanthi Narayan
author_sort Fukushima, Ayako
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Smartphone technology can support paperless reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The aims of this study were to systematically assess smartphone ADR-reporting applications, understand their qualitative and quantitative impact on ADR reporting, and garner key lessons from owners and developers. METHODS: This study had three components: (1) An assessment of ADR-reporting apps, (2) an online survey on the impact of app implementation on ADR reporting and the experiences of app developers and owners, and (3) a search of VigiBase, the World Health Organization global database of individual case safety reports (ICSRs), to observe trends in the number of ADR reports targeting countries where the apps were implemented. RESULTS: Twenty-two apps were included. Eight out of the 22 apps were for countries in the WHO African region. Features observed included E2B data elements (E stands for efficacy) and functions supporting reporting and user engagement. Seventeen app developers and owners answered to the survey and reported overall positive experiences with app features, and post-launch increases in the total number of ICSRs. User type and user environment were cited as factors influencing app use: Respondents said younger people and/or those with an inclination to use technology were more likely to use apps compared to older or more technology-averse people, while respondents in countries with limited internet connectivity reported persistent difficulties in app use. CONCLUSIONS: Smartphone apps for reporting ADRs offer added value compared to conventional reporting tools. Reporting tools should be selected based on interface features and factors that may influence app usage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9063059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90630592022-05-04 Smartphone-based mobile applications for adverse drug reactions reporting: global status and country experience Fukushima, Ayako Iessa, Noha Balakrishnan, Madhava Ram Pal, Shanthi Narayan BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Smartphone technology can support paperless reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The aims of this study were to systematically assess smartphone ADR-reporting applications, understand their qualitative and quantitative impact on ADR reporting, and garner key lessons from owners and developers. METHODS: This study had three components: (1) An assessment of ADR-reporting apps, (2) an online survey on the impact of app implementation on ADR reporting and the experiences of app developers and owners, and (3) a search of VigiBase, the World Health Organization global database of individual case safety reports (ICSRs), to observe trends in the number of ADR reports targeting countries where the apps were implemented. RESULTS: Twenty-two apps were included. Eight out of the 22 apps were for countries in the WHO African region. Features observed included E2B data elements (E stands for efficacy) and functions supporting reporting and user engagement. Seventeen app developers and owners answered to the survey and reported overall positive experiences with app features, and post-launch increases in the total number of ICSRs. User type and user environment were cited as factors influencing app use: Respondents said younger people and/or those with an inclination to use technology were more likely to use apps compared to older or more technology-averse people, while respondents in countries with limited internet connectivity reported persistent difficulties in app use. CONCLUSIONS: Smartphone apps for reporting ADRs offer added value compared to conventional reporting tools. Reporting tools should be selected based on interface features and factors that may influence app usage. BioMed Central 2022-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9063059/ /pubmed/35501745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01832-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fukushima, Ayako
Iessa, Noha
Balakrishnan, Madhava Ram
Pal, Shanthi Narayan
Smartphone-based mobile applications for adverse drug reactions reporting: global status and country experience
title Smartphone-based mobile applications for adverse drug reactions reporting: global status and country experience
title_full Smartphone-based mobile applications for adverse drug reactions reporting: global status and country experience
title_fullStr Smartphone-based mobile applications for adverse drug reactions reporting: global status and country experience
title_full_unstemmed Smartphone-based mobile applications for adverse drug reactions reporting: global status and country experience
title_short Smartphone-based mobile applications for adverse drug reactions reporting: global status and country experience
title_sort smartphone-based mobile applications for adverse drug reactions reporting: global status and country experience
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35501745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-022-01832-7
work_keys_str_mv AT fukushimaayako smartphonebasedmobileapplicationsforadversedrugreactionsreportingglobalstatusandcountryexperience
AT iessanoha smartphonebasedmobileapplicationsforadversedrugreactionsreportingglobalstatusandcountryexperience
AT balakrishnanmadhavaram smartphonebasedmobileapplicationsforadversedrugreactionsreportingglobalstatusandcountryexperience
AT palshanthinarayan smartphonebasedmobileapplicationsforadversedrugreactionsreportingglobalstatusandcountryexperience