Cargando…
No difference in clinical outcome, pain, and range of motion between fixed and mobile bearing Attune total knee arthroplasty: a prospective single-center trial
BACKGROUND: Despite numerous scientific investigations, the tribological advantages of mobile bearing inserts have not been sustainably confirmed or refuted for modern knee prostheses in clinical studies. The purpose of this study was to compare fixed and mobile bearing inserts in order to draw conc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35501786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05382-x |
_version_ | 1784699087104245760 |
---|---|
author | Ruckenstuhl, Paul Revelant, Fabio Hauer, Georg Bernhardt, Gerwin A. Leitner, Lukas Gruber, Gerald Leithner, Andreas Sadoghi, Patrick |
author_facet | Ruckenstuhl, Paul Revelant, Fabio Hauer, Georg Bernhardt, Gerwin A. Leitner, Lukas Gruber, Gerald Leithner, Andreas Sadoghi, Patrick |
author_sort | Ruckenstuhl, Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite numerous scientific investigations, the tribological advantages of mobile bearing inserts have not been sustainably confirmed or refuted for modern knee prostheses in clinical studies. The purpose of this study was to compare fixed and mobile bearing inserts in order to draw conclusions regarding clinical benefits. METHODS: The present prospective single center cohort study of 2 non-randomized stratified groups consisted of 67 patients. All included patients received cemented total knee arthroplasty (Attune®) due to osteoarthritis. 34 patients were treated with a mobile and 33 patients with a fixed insert. The WOMAC score and the Visual Analogue Scale was used for the subjective assessment of success, while the Knee-Society-Score was used considering the Range of Motion for the objective assessment. The subjective and the clinical scores showed improvements for both compared groups postoperatively at 2 years of minimum follow-up. RESULTS: The overall postoperative results of the WOMAC score, the Knee-Society-Score and the Visual Analogue Scale presented no statistically difference between the compared groups (p > 0,05). The postoperative ROM showed a superior improvement of 13.2° ± 18.4° in the mobile-bearing group versus 4.9° ± 18.4° (p = 0.017) in the fixed-bearing group. The flexion of the knee joint was 114° ± 10.1° for the mobile-bearings and 109.2° ± 7.2° for fixed bearings (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: According to the findings, both inserts showed overall promising postoperative results, in terms of objective as well as subjective parameters, without clinically relevant significant differences, except for ROM, which was superior in the mobile bearing group. The present clinical trial has been registered at the ISRCTN registry with the reverence number ISRCTN15117998 on 04/04/2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05382-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9063062 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90630622022-05-04 No difference in clinical outcome, pain, and range of motion between fixed and mobile bearing Attune total knee arthroplasty: a prospective single-center trial Ruckenstuhl, Paul Revelant, Fabio Hauer, Georg Bernhardt, Gerwin A. Leitner, Lukas Gruber, Gerald Leithner, Andreas Sadoghi, Patrick BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Despite numerous scientific investigations, the tribological advantages of mobile bearing inserts have not been sustainably confirmed or refuted for modern knee prostheses in clinical studies. The purpose of this study was to compare fixed and mobile bearing inserts in order to draw conclusions regarding clinical benefits. METHODS: The present prospective single center cohort study of 2 non-randomized stratified groups consisted of 67 patients. All included patients received cemented total knee arthroplasty (Attune®) due to osteoarthritis. 34 patients were treated with a mobile and 33 patients with a fixed insert. The WOMAC score and the Visual Analogue Scale was used for the subjective assessment of success, while the Knee-Society-Score was used considering the Range of Motion for the objective assessment. The subjective and the clinical scores showed improvements for both compared groups postoperatively at 2 years of minimum follow-up. RESULTS: The overall postoperative results of the WOMAC score, the Knee-Society-Score and the Visual Analogue Scale presented no statistically difference between the compared groups (p > 0,05). The postoperative ROM showed a superior improvement of 13.2° ± 18.4° in the mobile-bearing group versus 4.9° ± 18.4° (p = 0.017) in the fixed-bearing group. The flexion of the knee joint was 114° ± 10.1° for the mobile-bearings and 109.2° ± 7.2° for fixed bearings (p = 0.012). CONCLUSION: According to the findings, both inserts showed overall promising postoperative results, in terms of objective as well as subjective parameters, without clinically relevant significant differences, except for ROM, which was superior in the mobile bearing group. The present clinical trial has been registered at the ISRCTN registry with the reverence number ISRCTN15117998 on 04/04/2022. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05382-x. BioMed Central 2022-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9063062/ /pubmed/35501786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05382-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ruckenstuhl, Paul Revelant, Fabio Hauer, Georg Bernhardt, Gerwin A. Leitner, Lukas Gruber, Gerald Leithner, Andreas Sadoghi, Patrick No difference in clinical outcome, pain, and range of motion between fixed and mobile bearing Attune total knee arthroplasty: a prospective single-center trial |
title | No difference in clinical outcome, pain, and range of motion between fixed and mobile bearing Attune total knee arthroplasty: a prospective single-center trial |
title_full | No difference in clinical outcome, pain, and range of motion between fixed and mobile bearing Attune total knee arthroplasty: a prospective single-center trial |
title_fullStr | No difference in clinical outcome, pain, and range of motion between fixed and mobile bearing Attune total knee arthroplasty: a prospective single-center trial |
title_full_unstemmed | No difference in clinical outcome, pain, and range of motion between fixed and mobile bearing Attune total knee arthroplasty: a prospective single-center trial |
title_short | No difference in clinical outcome, pain, and range of motion between fixed and mobile bearing Attune total knee arthroplasty: a prospective single-center trial |
title_sort | no difference in clinical outcome, pain, and range of motion between fixed and mobile bearing attune total knee arthroplasty: a prospective single-center trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35501786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05382-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ruckenstuhlpaul nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomepainandrangeofmotionbetweenfixedandmobilebearingattunetotalkneearthroplastyaprospectivesinglecentertrial AT revelantfabio nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomepainandrangeofmotionbetweenfixedandmobilebearingattunetotalkneearthroplastyaprospectivesinglecentertrial AT hauergeorg nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomepainandrangeofmotionbetweenfixedandmobilebearingattunetotalkneearthroplastyaprospectivesinglecentertrial AT bernhardtgerwina nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomepainandrangeofmotionbetweenfixedandmobilebearingattunetotalkneearthroplastyaprospectivesinglecentertrial AT leitnerlukas nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomepainandrangeofmotionbetweenfixedandmobilebearingattunetotalkneearthroplastyaprospectivesinglecentertrial AT grubergerald nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomepainandrangeofmotionbetweenfixedandmobilebearingattunetotalkneearthroplastyaprospectivesinglecentertrial AT leithnerandreas nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomepainandrangeofmotionbetweenfixedandmobilebearingattunetotalkneearthroplastyaprospectivesinglecentertrial AT sadoghipatrick nodifferenceinclinicaloutcomepainandrangeofmotionbetweenfixedandmobilebearingattunetotalkneearthroplastyaprospectivesinglecentertrial |