Management of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations involves additional factors aside from the diameter of feeding arteries: a 3-year case-case retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) are rare but cause various manifestations. Although the diameter of feeding arteries has been linked to treatment decisions, relationships among the characteristics of PAVMs, clinical symptoms, and treatment effect remain unclear. The present study was performed to investigate how collective characteristics of PAVMs relate to clinical symptoms and to provide proper treatment recommendations for patients with PAVMs. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 838,447 patients’ radiographic data and medical records from January 2018 to December 2020. Patients were included if a PAVM was radiographically detected for the first time in our hospital. Ordered multivariable logistic regression and hierarchical multiple regression were performed to analyse the relationships between characteristics of PAVMs and various clinical symptoms. We investigated the management of PAVMs in four tertiary university hospitals. RESULTS: Detection rate of PAVMs was 0.025% (207/838,447), and 37.6% of patients (78/207) also had hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia. Eight patients were diagnosed with bilateral diffuse PAVMs. Two hundred thirty-six lesions were detected in 199 patients, and the mean diameter of the feeding artery was 4.13 ± 1.92 mm. Most PAVMs were the simple type and located in the peripheral pulmonary area. In total, 34.3% of patients (71/207) were symptom-free; remaining patients showed various manifestations, and respiratory symptoms were most common (dyspnoea on exertion, 47.8%). The diameter of the feeding artery and the type and the number of PAVMs were correlated with hypoxaemia (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.037, respectively). The collective characteristics of PAVMs were not related to the severity of central nervous system symptoms (largest diameter of feeding artery, P = 0.8; largest diameter of sac, P = 0.42; number of PAVMs, P = 0.35; type of PAVMs, P = 0.99). Various symptoms were greatly relieved after treatment. The hospital investigation showed that management of PAVMs was not generally appreciated in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed a low detection rate of PAVMs and a low degree of association with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia in the general population. Considering the connection between collective characteristics of PAVMs and various clinical symptoms, clinicians should consider the type and number of PAVMs, the largest diameter of the feeding artery, and clinical symptoms when managing patients with PAVMs.