Cargando…
Comparison of visceral fat lipolysis adaptation to high-intensity interval training in obesity-prone and obesity-resistant rats
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Visceral obesity is one of the key features of metabolic syndrome. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) could effectively reduce visceral fat, but its effects show strong heterogeneity in populations with different degrees of obesity. The mechanism may be related to the dif...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35501906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-022-00834-9 |
_version_ | 1784699114447962112 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Yang Li, Yu Cheng, Baishuo Feng, Shige Zhu, Xiangui Chen, Wei Zhang, Haifeng |
author_facet | Liu, Yang Li, Yu Cheng, Baishuo Feng, Shige Zhu, Xiangui Chen, Wei Zhang, Haifeng |
author_sort | Liu, Yang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Visceral obesity is one of the key features of metabolic syndrome. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) could effectively reduce visceral fat, but its effects show strong heterogeneity in populations with different degrees of obesity. The mechanism may be related to the differential adaptation to training between obesity phenotypes, namely obesity prone (OP) and obesity resistant (OR). The aim of the present study was to compare adaptive changes of visceral adipose lipolysis adaptation to HIIT between OP and OR animals and further explore the upstream pathway. METHODS: OP and OR Sprague Dawley rats were established after feeding a high-fat diet for 6 weeks; they were then divided into HIIT (H-OP and H-OR) and control (C-OP and C-OR) groups. After 12 weeks of HIIT or a sedentary lifestyle, animals were fasted for 12 h and then sacrificed for histology as well as gene and protein analysis. Visceral adipocytes were isolated without fasting for catecholamine stimulation and β3-adrenergic receptor (β3-AR) blockade in vitro to evaluate the role of upstream pathways. RESULTS: After training, there were no differences in weight loss or food intake between OP and OR rats (P > 0.05). However, the visceral fat mass, adipocyte volume, serum triglycerides and liver lipids of OP rats decreased by more than those of OR rats (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the cell lipolytic capacity and the increase in the expression of β3-AR were higher in the OP compared with OR groups (P < 0.05). Although training did not increase sympathetic nervous system activity (P > 0.05), the cell sensitivity to catecholamine increased significantly in the OP compared with OR groups (P < 0.05). Following blocking β3-AR, the increased sensitivity disappeared. CONCLUSION: With HIIT, OP rats lost more visceral fat than OR rats, which was related to stronger adaptive changes in lipolysis. Increased β3-AR expression mediated this adaptation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9063201 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90632012022-05-04 Comparison of visceral fat lipolysis adaptation to high-intensity interval training in obesity-prone and obesity-resistant rats Liu, Yang Li, Yu Cheng, Baishuo Feng, Shige Zhu, Xiangui Chen, Wei Zhang, Haifeng Diabetol Metab Syndr Research BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Visceral obesity is one of the key features of metabolic syndrome. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) could effectively reduce visceral fat, but its effects show strong heterogeneity in populations with different degrees of obesity. The mechanism may be related to the differential adaptation to training between obesity phenotypes, namely obesity prone (OP) and obesity resistant (OR). The aim of the present study was to compare adaptive changes of visceral adipose lipolysis adaptation to HIIT between OP and OR animals and further explore the upstream pathway. METHODS: OP and OR Sprague Dawley rats were established after feeding a high-fat diet for 6 weeks; they were then divided into HIIT (H-OP and H-OR) and control (C-OP and C-OR) groups. After 12 weeks of HIIT or a sedentary lifestyle, animals were fasted for 12 h and then sacrificed for histology as well as gene and protein analysis. Visceral adipocytes were isolated without fasting for catecholamine stimulation and β3-adrenergic receptor (β3-AR) blockade in vitro to evaluate the role of upstream pathways. RESULTS: After training, there were no differences in weight loss or food intake between OP and OR rats (P > 0.05). However, the visceral fat mass, adipocyte volume, serum triglycerides and liver lipids of OP rats decreased by more than those of OR rats (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the cell lipolytic capacity and the increase in the expression of β3-AR were higher in the OP compared with OR groups (P < 0.05). Although training did not increase sympathetic nervous system activity (P > 0.05), the cell sensitivity to catecholamine increased significantly in the OP compared with OR groups (P < 0.05). Following blocking β3-AR, the increased sensitivity disappeared. CONCLUSION: With HIIT, OP rats lost more visceral fat than OR rats, which was related to stronger adaptive changes in lipolysis. Increased β3-AR expression mediated this adaptation. BioMed Central 2022-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9063201/ /pubmed/35501906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-022-00834-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Liu, Yang Li, Yu Cheng, Baishuo Feng, Shige Zhu, Xiangui Chen, Wei Zhang, Haifeng Comparison of visceral fat lipolysis adaptation to high-intensity interval training in obesity-prone and obesity-resistant rats |
title | Comparison of visceral fat lipolysis adaptation to high-intensity interval training in obesity-prone and obesity-resistant rats |
title_full | Comparison of visceral fat lipolysis adaptation to high-intensity interval training in obesity-prone and obesity-resistant rats |
title_fullStr | Comparison of visceral fat lipolysis adaptation to high-intensity interval training in obesity-prone and obesity-resistant rats |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of visceral fat lipolysis adaptation to high-intensity interval training in obesity-prone and obesity-resistant rats |
title_short | Comparison of visceral fat lipolysis adaptation to high-intensity interval training in obesity-prone and obesity-resistant rats |
title_sort | comparison of visceral fat lipolysis adaptation to high-intensity interval training in obesity-prone and obesity-resistant rats |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35501906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13098-022-00834-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuyang comparisonofvisceralfatlipolysisadaptationtohighintensityintervaltraininginobesityproneandobesityresistantrats AT liyu comparisonofvisceralfatlipolysisadaptationtohighintensityintervaltraininginobesityproneandobesityresistantrats AT chengbaishuo comparisonofvisceralfatlipolysisadaptationtohighintensityintervaltraininginobesityproneandobesityresistantrats AT fengshige comparisonofvisceralfatlipolysisadaptationtohighintensityintervaltraininginobesityproneandobesityresistantrats AT zhuxiangui comparisonofvisceralfatlipolysisadaptationtohighintensityintervaltraininginobesityproneandobesityresistantrats AT chenwei comparisonofvisceralfatlipolysisadaptationtohighintensityintervaltraininginobesityproneandobesityresistantrats AT zhanghaifeng comparisonofvisceralfatlipolysisadaptationtohighintensityintervaltraininginobesityproneandobesityresistantrats |