Cargando…

A systematic analysis of gene–gene interaction in multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND: For the most part, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have only partially explained the heritability of complex diseases. One of their limitations is to assume independent contributions of individual variants to the phenotype. Many tools have therefore been developed to investigate t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slim, Lotfi, Chatelain, Clément, Foucauld, Hélène de, Azencott, Chloé-Agathe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35501860
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-022-01247-3
_version_ 1784699117890437120
author Slim, Lotfi
Chatelain, Clément
Foucauld, Hélène de
Azencott, Chloé-Agathe
author_facet Slim, Lotfi
Chatelain, Clément
Foucauld, Hélène de
Azencott, Chloé-Agathe
author_sort Slim, Lotfi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For the most part, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have only partially explained the heritability of complex diseases. One of their limitations is to assume independent contributions of individual variants to the phenotype. Many tools have therefore been developed to investigate the interactions between distant loci, or epistasis. Among them, the recently proposed EpiGWAS models the interactions between a target variant and the rest of the genome. However, applying this approach to studying interactions along all genes of a disease map is not straightforward. Here, we propose a pipeline to that effect, which we illustrate by investigating a multiple sclerosis GWAS dataset from the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2 through 19 disease maps from the MetaCore pathway database. RESULTS: For each disease map, we build an epistatic network by connecting the genes that are deemed to interact. These networks tend to be connected, complementary to the disease maps and contain hubs. In addition, we report 4 epistatic gene pairs involving missense variants, and 25 gene pairs with a deleterious epistatic effect mediated by eQTLs. Among these, we highlight the interaction of GLI-1 and SUFU, and of IP10 and NF-[Formula: see text] B, as they both match known biological interactions. The latter pair is particularly promising for therapeutic development, as both genes have known inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showcases the ability of EpiGWAS to uncover biologically interpretable epistatic interactions that are potentially actionable for the development of combination therapy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12920-022-01247-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9063218
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90632182022-05-04 A systematic analysis of gene–gene interaction in multiple sclerosis Slim, Lotfi Chatelain, Clément Foucauld, Hélène de Azencott, Chloé-Agathe BMC Med Genomics Research BACKGROUND: For the most part, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have only partially explained the heritability of complex diseases. One of their limitations is to assume independent contributions of individual variants to the phenotype. Many tools have therefore been developed to investigate the interactions between distant loci, or epistasis. Among them, the recently proposed EpiGWAS models the interactions between a target variant and the rest of the genome. However, applying this approach to studying interactions along all genes of a disease map is not straightforward. Here, we propose a pipeline to that effect, which we illustrate by investigating a multiple sclerosis GWAS dataset from the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2 through 19 disease maps from the MetaCore pathway database. RESULTS: For each disease map, we build an epistatic network by connecting the genes that are deemed to interact. These networks tend to be connected, complementary to the disease maps and contain hubs. In addition, we report 4 epistatic gene pairs involving missense variants, and 25 gene pairs with a deleterious epistatic effect mediated by eQTLs. Among these, we highlight the interaction of GLI-1 and SUFU, and of IP10 and NF-[Formula: see text] B, as they both match known biological interactions. The latter pair is particularly promising for therapeutic development, as both genes have known inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showcases the ability of EpiGWAS to uncover biologically interpretable epistatic interactions that are potentially actionable for the development of combination therapy. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12920-022-01247-3. BioMed Central 2022-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9063218/ /pubmed/35501860 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-022-01247-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Slim, Lotfi
Chatelain, Clément
Foucauld, Hélène de
Azencott, Chloé-Agathe
A systematic analysis of gene–gene interaction in multiple sclerosis
title A systematic analysis of gene–gene interaction in multiple sclerosis
title_full A systematic analysis of gene–gene interaction in multiple sclerosis
title_fullStr A systematic analysis of gene–gene interaction in multiple sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed A systematic analysis of gene–gene interaction in multiple sclerosis
title_short A systematic analysis of gene–gene interaction in multiple sclerosis
title_sort systematic analysis of gene–gene interaction in multiple sclerosis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063218/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35501860
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-022-01247-3
work_keys_str_mv AT slimlotfi asystematicanalysisofgenegeneinteractioninmultiplesclerosis
AT chatelainclement asystematicanalysisofgenegeneinteractioninmultiplesclerosis
AT foucauldhelenede asystematicanalysisofgenegeneinteractioninmultiplesclerosis
AT azencottchloeagathe asystematicanalysisofgenegeneinteractioninmultiplesclerosis
AT slimlotfi systematicanalysisofgenegeneinteractioninmultiplesclerosis
AT chatelainclement systematicanalysisofgenegeneinteractioninmultiplesclerosis
AT foucauldhelenede systematicanalysisofgenegeneinteractioninmultiplesclerosis
AT azencottchloeagathe systematicanalysisofgenegeneinteractioninmultiplesclerosis