Cargando…

Integrating patient- and caregiver-reported outcome measures into the daily care routines of specialised outpatient palliative care: a qualitative study (ELSAH) on feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness

BACKGROUND: The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and caregiver-reported outcome measures can raise the patient centeredness of treatment and improve the quality of palliative care. Nevertheless, the everyday implementation of self-report in patients and caregivers is complex, and shou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seipp, Hannah, Haasenritter, Jörg, Hach, Michaela, Becker, Dorothée, Schütze, Dania, Engler, Jennifer, Ploeger, Cornelia, Bösner, Stefan, Kuss, Katrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35501844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-00944-1
_version_ 1784699120122855424
author Seipp, Hannah
Haasenritter, Jörg
Hach, Michaela
Becker, Dorothée
Schütze, Dania
Engler, Jennifer
Ploeger, Cornelia
Bösner, Stefan
Kuss, Katrin
author_facet Seipp, Hannah
Haasenritter, Jörg
Hach, Michaela
Becker, Dorothée
Schütze, Dania
Engler, Jennifer
Ploeger, Cornelia
Bösner, Stefan
Kuss, Katrin
author_sort Seipp, Hannah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and caregiver-reported outcome measures can raise the patient centeredness of treatment and improve the quality of palliative care. Nevertheless, the everyday implementation of self-report in patients and caregivers is complex, and should be adapted for use in specific settings. We aimed to implement a set of outcome measures that included patient and caregiver self- and proxy-reported outcome measures in specialised outpatient palliative care (SOPC). In this study, we explore how the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale (IPOS), IPOS Views on Care (IPOS VoC) and the Short-form Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview (ZBI-7) can be feasibly, acceptably and appropriately implemented in the daily care routines of SOPC. METHODS: Five SOPC teams were trained, and used the outcome measures in daily practice. Team members were mainly nurses and physicians. To investigate their feedback, we used a multi-method qualitative design consisting of focus groups with SOPC-team members (n = 14), field notes of meetings and conversations with the SOPC teams. In an iterative process, we analysed the findings using qualitative content analysis and refined use of the outcome measures. RESULTS: We found that integrating patient and caregiver outcome measures into daily care routines in SOPC is feasible. To improve feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness, the resulting burden on patients and relatives should be kept to a minimum, the usefulness of the measures must be understood, they should be used considerately, and administration must be manageable. We removed ZBI-7 from the set of measures as a result of feedback on its content and wording. CONCLUSIONS: SOPC-team members have reservations about the implementation of PROM in SOPC, but with appropriate adjustments, its application in daily care is feasible, accepted and perceived as appropriate. Previous to use, SOPC-team members should be trained in how to apply the measures, in the design of manageable processes that include integration into electronic documentation systems, and in ongoing evaluation and support. They should also be taught how useful the measures can be. TRIAL REGISTRATION: May 19(th), 2017, German Clinical Trials Register DRKS-ID: DRKS00012421. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-022-00944-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9063228
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90632282022-05-04 Integrating patient- and caregiver-reported outcome measures into the daily care routines of specialised outpatient palliative care: a qualitative study (ELSAH) on feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness Seipp, Hannah Haasenritter, Jörg Hach, Michaela Becker, Dorothée Schütze, Dania Engler, Jennifer Ploeger, Cornelia Bösner, Stefan Kuss, Katrin BMC Palliat Care Research BACKGROUND: The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and caregiver-reported outcome measures can raise the patient centeredness of treatment and improve the quality of palliative care. Nevertheless, the everyday implementation of self-report in patients and caregivers is complex, and should be adapted for use in specific settings. We aimed to implement a set of outcome measures that included patient and caregiver self- and proxy-reported outcome measures in specialised outpatient palliative care (SOPC). In this study, we explore how the Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale (IPOS), IPOS Views on Care (IPOS VoC) and the Short-form Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview (ZBI-7) can be feasibly, acceptably and appropriately implemented in the daily care routines of SOPC. METHODS: Five SOPC teams were trained, and used the outcome measures in daily practice. Team members were mainly nurses and physicians. To investigate their feedback, we used a multi-method qualitative design consisting of focus groups with SOPC-team members (n = 14), field notes of meetings and conversations with the SOPC teams. In an iterative process, we analysed the findings using qualitative content analysis and refined use of the outcome measures. RESULTS: We found that integrating patient and caregiver outcome measures into daily care routines in SOPC is feasible. To improve feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness, the resulting burden on patients and relatives should be kept to a minimum, the usefulness of the measures must be understood, they should be used considerately, and administration must be manageable. We removed ZBI-7 from the set of measures as a result of feedback on its content and wording. CONCLUSIONS: SOPC-team members have reservations about the implementation of PROM in SOPC, but with appropriate adjustments, its application in daily care is feasible, accepted and perceived as appropriate. Previous to use, SOPC-team members should be trained in how to apply the measures, in the design of manageable processes that include integration into electronic documentation systems, and in ongoing evaluation and support. They should also be taught how useful the measures can be. TRIAL REGISTRATION: May 19(th), 2017, German Clinical Trials Register DRKS-ID: DRKS00012421. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-022-00944-1. BioMed Central 2022-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9063228/ /pubmed/35501844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-00944-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Seipp, Hannah
Haasenritter, Jörg
Hach, Michaela
Becker, Dorothée
Schütze, Dania
Engler, Jennifer
Ploeger, Cornelia
Bösner, Stefan
Kuss, Katrin
Integrating patient- and caregiver-reported outcome measures into the daily care routines of specialised outpatient palliative care: a qualitative study (ELSAH) on feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness
title Integrating patient- and caregiver-reported outcome measures into the daily care routines of specialised outpatient palliative care: a qualitative study (ELSAH) on feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness
title_full Integrating patient- and caregiver-reported outcome measures into the daily care routines of specialised outpatient palliative care: a qualitative study (ELSAH) on feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness
title_fullStr Integrating patient- and caregiver-reported outcome measures into the daily care routines of specialised outpatient palliative care: a qualitative study (ELSAH) on feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness
title_full_unstemmed Integrating patient- and caregiver-reported outcome measures into the daily care routines of specialised outpatient palliative care: a qualitative study (ELSAH) on feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness
title_short Integrating patient- and caregiver-reported outcome measures into the daily care routines of specialised outpatient palliative care: a qualitative study (ELSAH) on feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness
title_sort integrating patient- and caregiver-reported outcome measures into the daily care routines of specialised outpatient palliative care: a qualitative study (elsah) on feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063228/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35501844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-00944-1
work_keys_str_mv AT seipphannah integratingpatientandcaregiverreportedoutcomemeasuresintothedailycareroutinesofspecialisedoutpatientpalliativecareaqualitativestudyelsahonfeasibilityacceptabilityandappropriateness
AT haasenritterjorg integratingpatientandcaregiverreportedoutcomemeasuresintothedailycareroutinesofspecialisedoutpatientpalliativecareaqualitativestudyelsahonfeasibilityacceptabilityandappropriateness
AT hachmichaela integratingpatientandcaregiverreportedoutcomemeasuresintothedailycareroutinesofspecialisedoutpatientpalliativecareaqualitativestudyelsahonfeasibilityacceptabilityandappropriateness
AT beckerdorothee integratingpatientandcaregiverreportedoutcomemeasuresintothedailycareroutinesofspecialisedoutpatientpalliativecareaqualitativestudyelsahonfeasibilityacceptabilityandappropriateness
AT schutzedania integratingpatientandcaregiverreportedoutcomemeasuresintothedailycareroutinesofspecialisedoutpatientpalliativecareaqualitativestudyelsahonfeasibilityacceptabilityandappropriateness
AT englerjennifer integratingpatientandcaregiverreportedoutcomemeasuresintothedailycareroutinesofspecialisedoutpatientpalliativecareaqualitativestudyelsahonfeasibilityacceptabilityandappropriateness
AT ploegercornelia integratingpatientandcaregiverreportedoutcomemeasuresintothedailycareroutinesofspecialisedoutpatientpalliativecareaqualitativestudyelsahonfeasibilityacceptabilityandappropriateness
AT bosnerstefan integratingpatientandcaregiverreportedoutcomemeasuresintothedailycareroutinesofspecialisedoutpatientpalliativecareaqualitativestudyelsahonfeasibilityacceptabilityandappropriateness
AT kusskatrin integratingpatientandcaregiverreportedoutcomemeasuresintothedailycareroutinesofspecialisedoutpatientpalliativecareaqualitativestudyelsahonfeasibilityacceptabilityandappropriateness