Cargando…
COVID-19-Pandemiekrisenstäbe: Organisation, Befugnisse und Herausforderungen – Strukturelle Gegebenheiten verstehen und nutzen
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Germany has a federal state system. Pandemic response teams are key instruments of pandemic management. The aim of this article is to describe the structures and powers of pandemic response teams that were explored during a study on the care of the critically ill and dying in tim...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35503572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00103-022-03542-x |
_version_ | 1784699124571963392 |
---|---|
author | Klinger, Isabell Heckel, Maria Shahda, Sophie Krisen, Ursula Stellmacher, Silke Kurkowski, Sandra Junghanß, Christian Ostgathe, Christoph |
author_facet | Klinger, Isabell Heckel, Maria Shahda, Sophie Krisen, Ursula Stellmacher, Silke Kurkowski, Sandra Junghanß, Christian Ostgathe, Christoph |
author_sort | Klinger, Isabell |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIM: Germany has a federal state system. Pandemic response teams are key instruments of pandemic management. The aim of this article is to describe the structures and powers of pandemic response teams that were explored during a study on the care of the critically ill and dying in times of a pandemic (PallPan). The focus is on health-related pandemic response teams on the national state level (macrolevel) and federal and community level (mesolevel) as well as pandemic response teams in healthcare facilities (microlevel). METHODS: Members of pandemic response teams took part in qualitative semi-structured interviews (October 2020–February 2021). The evaluation was carried out by means of qualitative structuring content analysis. RESULTS: Forty-two persons reported on 43 crisis teams from 14 federal states. Response teams in healthcare facilities and public administration differ primarily with regard to their competencies. Officially predetermined regulations regarding the initiation, personal composition, tasks, responsibilities, and competencies of pandemic response teams are not predefined in Germany. The macrolevel defined the legal and financial conditions for pandemic management. Meso- and microlevel pandemic response teams bear responsibility for maintaining the provision of healthcare. The defaults of local public health authorities are decisive for the pandemic response team’s work. Main tasks and measures were the provision of information and the procurement and distribution of resources. DISCUSSION: In terms of preparing for future pandemic situations, the knowledge gained will help to address concerns about maintaining healthcare for specific population groups, such as seriously ill and dying people, to the locally differing responsible bodies, even under pandemic conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9063247 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90632472022-05-03 COVID-19-Pandemiekrisenstäbe: Organisation, Befugnisse und Herausforderungen – Strukturelle Gegebenheiten verstehen und nutzen Klinger, Isabell Heckel, Maria Shahda, Sophie Krisen, Ursula Stellmacher, Silke Kurkowski, Sandra Junghanß, Christian Ostgathe, Christoph Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz Originalien und Übersichten BACKGROUND AND AIM: Germany has a federal state system. Pandemic response teams are key instruments of pandemic management. The aim of this article is to describe the structures and powers of pandemic response teams that were explored during a study on the care of the critically ill and dying in times of a pandemic (PallPan). The focus is on health-related pandemic response teams on the national state level (macrolevel) and federal and community level (mesolevel) as well as pandemic response teams in healthcare facilities (microlevel). METHODS: Members of pandemic response teams took part in qualitative semi-structured interviews (October 2020–February 2021). The evaluation was carried out by means of qualitative structuring content analysis. RESULTS: Forty-two persons reported on 43 crisis teams from 14 federal states. Response teams in healthcare facilities and public administration differ primarily with regard to their competencies. Officially predetermined regulations regarding the initiation, personal composition, tasks, responsibilities, and competencies of pandemic response teams are not predefined in Germany. The macrolevel defined the legal and financial conditions for pandemic management. Meso- and microlevel pandemic response teams bear responsibility for maintaining the provision of healthcare. The defaults of local public health authorities are decisive for the pandemic response team’s work. Main tasks and measures were the provision of information and the procurement and distribution of resources. DISCUSSION: In terms of preparing for future pandemic situations, the knowledge gained will help to address concerns about maintaining healthcare for specific population groups, such as seriously ill and dying people, to the locally differing responsible bodies, even under pandemic conditions. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-05-03 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9063247/ /pubmed/35503572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00103-022-03542-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Originalien und Übersichten Klinger, Isabell Heckel, Maria Shahda, Sophie Krisen, Ursula Stellmacher, Silke Kurkowski, Sandra Junghanß, Christian Ostgathe, Christoph COVID-19-Pandemiekrisenstäbe: Organisation, Befugnisse und Herausforderungen – Strukturelle Gegebenheiten verstehen und nutzen |
title | COVID-19-Pandemiekrisenstäbe: Organisation, Befugnisse und Herausforderungen – Strukturelle Gegebenheiten verstehen und nutzen |
title_full | COVID-19-Pandemiekrisenstäbe: Organisation, Befugnisse und Herausforderungen – Strukturelle Gegebenheiten verstehen und nutzen |
title_fullStr | COVID-19-Pandemiekrisenstäbe: Organisation, Befugnisse und Herausforderungen – Strukturelle Gegebenheiten verstehen und nutzen |
title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19-Pandemiekrisenstäbe: Organisation, Befugnisse und Herausforderungen – Strukturelle Gegebenheiten verstehen und nutzen |
title_short | COVID-19-Pandemiekrisenstäbe: Organisation, Befugnisse und Herausforderungen – Strukturelle Gegebenheiten verstehen und nutzen |
title_sort | covid-19-pandemiekrisenstäbe: organisation, befugnisse und herausforderungen – strukturelle gegebenheiten verstehen und nutzen |
topic | Originalien und Übersichten |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35503572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00103-022-03542-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klingerisabell covid19pandemiekrisenstabeorganisationbefugnisseundherausforderungenstrukturellegegebenheitenverstehenundnutzen AT heckelmaria covid19pandemiekrisenstabeorganisationbefugnisseundherausforderungenstrukturellegegebenheitenverstehenundnutzen AT shahdasophie covid19pandemiekrisenstabeorganisationbefugnisseundherausforderungenstrukturellegegebenheitenverstehenundnutzen AT krisenursula covid19pandemiekrisenstabeorganisationbefugnisseundherausforderungenstrukturellegegebenheitenverstehenundnutzen AT stellmachersilke covid19pandemiekrisenstabeorganisationbefugnisseundherausforderungenstrukturellegegebenheitenverstehenundnutzen AT kurkowskisandra covid19pandemiekrisenstabeorganisationbefugnisseundherausforderungenstrukturellegegebenheitenverstehenundnutzen AT junghanßchristian covid19pandemiekrisenstabeorganisationbefugnisseundherausforderungenstrukturellegegebenheitenverstehenundnutzen AT ostgathechristoph covid19pandemiekrisenstabeorganisationbefugnisseundherausforderungenstrukturellegegebenheitenverstehenundnutzen |