Cargando…

Altered Temporal Variations of Functional Connectivity Associated With Surgical Outcomes in Drug-Resistant Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

BACKGROUND: Currently, more than one-third of patients with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) continue to develop seizures after resection surgery. Dynamic functional network connectivity (DFNC) analyses, capturing temporal properties of functional connectivity during MRI acquisition, may...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guo, Danni, Feng, Li, Yang, Zhiquan, Li, Rong, Xiao, Bo, Wen, Shirui, Du, Yangsa, Deng, Chijun, Wang, Xuyang, Liu, Dingyang, Xie, Fangfang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35516805
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.840481
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Currently, more than one-third of patients with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) continue to develop seizures after resection surgery. Dynamic functional network connectivity (DFNC) analyses, capturing temporal properties of functional connectivity during MRI acquisition, may help us identify unfavorable surgical outcomes. The purpose of this work was to explore the association of DFNC variations of preoperative resting-state MRI and surgical outcomes in patients with drug-resistant TLE. METHODS: We evaluated 61 patients with TLE matched for age and gender with 51 healthy controls (HC). Patients with TLE were classified as seizure-free (n = 39) and not seizure-free (n = 16) based on the Engel surgical outcome scale. Six patients were unable to confirm the postoperative status and were not included in the subgroup analysis. The DFNC was calculated using group spatial independent component analysis and the sliding window approach. RESULTS: Dynamic functional network connectivity analyses suggested two distinct connectivity “States.” The dynamic connectivity state of patients with TLE was different from HC. TLE subgroup analyses showed not seizure-free (NSF) patients spent significantly more time in State II compared to seizure-free (SF) patients and HC. Further, the number of transitions from State II to State I was significantly lower in NSF patients. SF patients had compensatory enhancement of DFNC strengths between default and dorsal attention network, as well as within the default network. While reduced DFNC strengths of within-network and inter-network were both observed in NSF patients, patients with abnormally temporal properties and more extension DFNC strength alterations were less likely to receive seizure freedom. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that DFNC could offer a better understanding of dynamic neural impairment mechanisms of drug-resistant TLE functional network, epileptic brain network reorganization, and provide an additional preoperative evaluation support for surgical treatment of drug-resistant TLE.