Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Eldecalcitol for Osteoporosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECT: Eldecalcitol (ED-71) is a vitamin D analog for the treatment of osteoporosis. However, inconsistent results have been reported in this regard. Hence, this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ED-71 for osteoporosis. METHODS: The PubM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Hongyan, Wang, Guoqi, Wu, Ting, Mu, Yiming, Gu, Weijun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35518938
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.854439
_version_ 1784699158584623104
author Liu, Hongyan
Wang, Guoqi
Wu, Ting
Mu, Yiming
Gu, Weijun
author_facet Liu, Hongyan
Wang, Guoqi
Wu, Ting
Mu, Yiming
Gu, Weijun
author_sort Liu, Hongyan
collection PubMed
description OBJECT: Eldecalcitol (ED-71) is a vitamin D analog for the treatment of osteoporosis. However, inconsistent results have been reported in this regard. Hence, this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ED-71 for osteoporosis. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify potential trials from inception until April 2021. The investigated outcomes included bone mineral density and fractures at various sites, and potential adverse events. The pooled effect estimates were calculated using weighted mean difference (WMD) and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model. RESULTS: Eight RCTs involving 2368 patients were selected for the final meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that ED-71 were associated with a higher level of femoral neck (FN) bone mineral density (BMD) (WMD: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.24–1.60; P = 0.008), while it had no significant effect on lumbar spine BMD (WMD: 1.09; 95% CI: –0.11 to 2.30; P = 0.076) and hip BMD (WMD: 1.12; 95% CI: –0.16 to 2.40; P = 0.088). Moreover, the use of ED-71 could protect against the risk of all osteoporotic fracture (RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.55–0.88; P = 0.003) and vertebral fracture (RR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.55–0.98; P = 0.038), while it did not affect the risk of nonvertebral fracture (RR: 0.53; 95%CI: 0.23–1.23; P = 0.140). The subgroup analyses found that the effects of ED-71 were superior to those of alfacalcidol on both BMD and fracture results. Moreover, the use of ED-71 plus bisphosphonate was associated with a greater improvement in BMD at various sites compared with bisphosphonate alone. Finally, ED-71 was associated with an increased risk of increased urine calcium level (RR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.33–2.15; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study found that the use of ED-71 could improve BMD and fractures at various sites, especially compared with alfacalcidol or a combination with bisphosphonate for patients with osteoporosis. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: [http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero], identifier [CRD42021270536].
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9063410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90634102022-05-04 Efficacy and Safety of Eldecalcitol for Osteoporosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Liu, Hongyan Wang, Guoqi Wu, Ting Mu, Yiming Gu, Weijun Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology OBJECT: Eldecalcitol (ED-71) is a vitamin D analog for the treatment of osteoporosis. However, inconsistent results have been reported in this regard. Hence, this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ED-71 for osteoporosis. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify potential trials from inception until April 2021. The investigated outcomes included bone mineral density and fractures at various sites, and potential adverse events. The pooled effect estimates were calculated using weighted mean difference (WMD) and relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model. RESULTS: Eight RCTs involving 2368 patients were selected for the final meta-analysis. The pooled results showed that ED-71 were associated with a higher level of femoral neck (FN) bone mineral density (BMD) (WMD: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.24–1.60; P = 0.008), while it had no significant effect on lumbar spine BMD (WMD: 1.09; 95% CI: –0.11 to 2.30; P = 0.076) and hip BMD (WMD: 1.12; 95% CI: –0.16 to 2.40; P = 0.088). Moreover, the use of ED-71 could protect against the risk of all osteoporotic fracture (RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.55–0.88; P = 0.003) and vertebral fracture (RR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.55–0.98; P = 0.038), while it did not affect the risk of nonvertebral fracture (RR: 0.53; 95%CI: 0.23–1.23; P = 0.140). The subgroup analyses found that the effects of ED-71 were superior to those of alfacalcidol on both BMD and fracture results. Moreover, the use of ED-71 plus bisphosphonate was associated with a greater improvement in BMD at various sites compared with bisphosphonate alone. Finally, ED-71 was associated with an increased risk of increased urine calcium level (RR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.33–2.15; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study found that the use of ED-71 could improve BMD and fractures at various sites, especially compared with alfacalcidol or a combination with bisphosphonate for patients with osteoporosis. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: [http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero], identifier [CRD42021270536]. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9063410/ /pubmed/35518938 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.854439 Text en Copyright © 2022 Liu, Wang, Wu, Mu and Gu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Liu, Hongyan
Wang, Guoqi
Wu, Ting
Mu, Yiming
Gu, Weijun
Efficacy and Safety of Eldecalcitol for Osteoporosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title Efficacy and Safety of Eldecalcitol for Osteoporosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Eldecalcitol for Osteoporosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Eldecalcitol for Osteoporosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Eldecalcitol for Osteoporosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Eldecalcitol for Osteoporosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of eldecalcitol for osteoporosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35518938
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.854439
work_keys_str_mv AT liuhongyan efficacyandsafetyofeldecalcitolforosteoporosisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wangguoqi efficacyandsafetyofeldecalcitolforosteoporosisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT wuting efficacyandsafetyofeldecalcitolforosteoporosisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT muyiming efficacyandsafetyofeldecalcitolforosteoporosisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT guweijun efficacyandsafetyofeldecalcitolforosteoporosisametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials