Cargando…

Impact of intra-abdominal insufflation pressure on gas leakage occurring during laparoscopy

INTRODUCTION: The advent of the COVID-19 pandemic led to recommendations aimed at minimizing the risk of gas leaks at laparoscopy. As this has continuing relevance including regarding operating room pollution, we empirically quantified carbon dioxide (CO(2)) leak jet velocity (important for particle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dalli, Jeffrey, Montminy, Tess, Ferguson, Makenzie, Khan, Mohammad Faraz, Nolan, Kevin, Cahill, Ronan A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35503476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09242-6
_version_ 1784699202180218880
author Dalli, Jeffrey
Montminy, Tess
Ferguson, Makenzie
Khan, Mohammad Faraz
Nolan, Kevin
Cahill, Ronan A.
author_facet Dalli, Jeffrey
Montminy, Tess
Ferguson, Makenzie
Khan, Mohammad Faraz
Nolan, Kevin
Cahill, Ronan A.
author_sort Dalli, Jeffrey
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The advent of the COVID-19 pandemic led to recommendations aimed at minimizing the risk of gas leaks at laparoscopy. As this has continuing relevance including regarding operating room pollution, we empirically quantified carbon dioxide (CO(2)) leak jet velocity (important for particle propulsion) occurring with different instruments inserted into differing trocars repeated across a range of intra-abdominal pressures (IAPs) and modern insufflators in an experimental model. METHOD: Laparoscopic gas plume leak velocity (metres/second) was computationally enumerated from schlieren optical flow videography on a porcine cadaveric laparoscopic model with IAPs of 4–5, 7–8, 12–15 and 24–25 mmHg (repeated with 5 different insufflators) during simulated operative use of laparoscopic clip appliers, scissors, energy device, camera and staplers as well as Veres needle (positive control) and trocar obturator (negative control) in fresh 5 mm and 12 mm ports. RESULTS: Close-fitting solid instruments (i.e. cameras and obturators) demonstrated slower gas leak velocities in both the 5 mm and 12 mm ports (p = 0.02 and less than 0.001) when compared to slimmer instruments, however, hollow instrument designs were seen to defy this pattern with the endoscopic linear stapler visibly inducing multiple rapid jests even when compared to similarly sized clip appliers (p = 0.03). However, on a per device basis the operating instrumentation displayed plume speeds which did not vary significantly when challenged with varying post size, IAP and a range of insufflators. CONCLUSION: In general, surgeon's selection of instrument, port or pressure does not usefully mitigate trocar CO(2) leak velocity. Instead better trocar design is needed, helped by a fuller understanding of trocar valve mechanics via computational fluid dynamics informed by relevant surgical modelling. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09242-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9063625
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90636252022-05-04 Impact of intra-abdominal insufflation pressure on gas leakage occurring during laparoscopy Dalli, Jeffrey Montminy, Tess Ferguson, Makenzie Khan, Mohammad Faraz Nolan, Kevin Cahill, Ronan A. Surg Endosc Dynamic Manuscript INTRODUCTION: The advent of the COVID-19 pandemic led to recommendations aimed at minimizing the risk of gas leaks at laparoscopy. As this has continuing relevance including regarding operating room pollution, we empirically quantified carbon dioxide (CO(2)) leak jet velocity (important for particle propulsion) occurring with different instruments inserted into differing trocars repeated across a range of intra-abdominal pressures (IAPs) and modern insufflators in an experimental model. METHOD: Laparoscopic gas plume leak velocity (metres/second) was computationally enumerated from schlieren optical flow videography on a porcine cadaveric laparoscopic model with IAPs of 4–5, 7–8, 12–15 and 24–25 mmHg (repeated with 5 different insufflators) during simulated operative use of laparoscopic clip appliers, scissors, energy device, camera and staplers as well as Veres needle (positive control) and trocar obturator (negative control) in fresh 5 mm and 12 mm ports. RESULTS: Close-fitting solid instruments (i.e. cameras and obturators) demonstrated slower gas leak velocities in both the 5 mm and 12 mm ports (p = 0.02 and less than 0.001) when compared to slimmer instruments, however, hollow instrument designs were seen to defy this pattern with the endoscopic linear stapler visibly inducing multiple rapid jests even when compared to similarly sized clip appliers (p = 0.03). However, on a per device basis the operating instrumentation displayed plume speeds which did not vary significantly when challenged with varying post size, IAP and a range of insufflators. CONCLUSION: In general, surgeon's selection of instrument, port or pressure does not usefully mitigate trocar CO(2) leak velocity. Instead better trocar design is needed, helped by a fuller understanding of trocar valve mechanics via computational fluid dynamics informed by relevant surgical modelling. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00464-022-09242-6. Springer US 2022-05-03 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9063625/ /pubmed/35503476 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09242-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Dynamic Manuscript
Dalli, Jeffrey
Montminy, Tess
Ferguson, Makenzie
Khan, Mohammad Faraz
Nolan, Kevin
Cahill, Ronan A.
Impact of intra-abdominal insufflation pressure on gas leakage occurring during laparoscopy
title Impact of intra-abdominal insufflation pressure on gas leakage occurring during laparoscopy
title_full Impact of intra-abdominal insufflation pressure on gas leakage occurring during laparoscopy
title_fullStr Impact of intra-abdominal insufflation pressure on gas leakage occurring during laparoscopy
title_full_unstemmed Impact of intra-abdominal insufflation pressure on gas leakage occurring during laparoscopy
title_short Impact of intra-abdominal insufflation pressure on gas leakage occurring during laparoscopy
title_sort impact of intra-abdominal insufflation pressure on gas leakage occurring during laparoscopy
topic Dynamic Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063625/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35503476
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09242-6
work_keys_str_mv AT dallijeffrey impactofintraabdominalinsufflationpressureongasleakageoccurringduringlaparoscopy
AT montminytess impactofintraabdominalinsufflationpressureongasleakageoccurringduringlaparoscopy
AT fergusonmakenzie impactofintraabdominalinsufflationpressureongasleakageoccurringduringlaparoscopy
AT khanmohammadfaraz impactofintraabdominalinsufflationpressureongasleakageoccurringduringlaparoscopy
AT nolankevin impactofintraabdominalinsufflationpressureongasleakageoccurringduringlaparoscopy
AT cahillronana impactofintraabdominalinsufflationpressureongasleakageoccurringduringlaparoscopy