Cargando…
Accuracy of Robotic and Frame-Based Stereotactic Neurosurgery in a Phantom Model
BACKGROUND: The development of robotic systems has provided an alternative to frame-based stereotactic procedures. The aim of this experimental phantom study was to compare the mechanical accuracy of the Robotic Surgery Assistant (ROSA) and the Leksell stereotactic frame by reducing clinical and pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35515711 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2022.762317 |
_version_ | 1784699203169026048 |
---|---|
author | Spyrantis, Andrea Woebbecke, Tirza Rueß, Daniel Constantinescu, Anne Gierich, Andreas Luyken, Klaus Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle Herrmann, Eva Gessler, Florian Czabanka, Marcus Treuer, Harald Ruge, Maximilian Freiman, Thomas M. |
author_facet | Spyrantis, Andrea Woebbecke, Tirza Rueß, Daniel Constantinescu, Anne Gierich, Andreas Luyken, Klaus Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle Herrmann, Eva Gessler, Florian Czabanka, Marcus Treuer, Harald Ruge, Maximilian Freiman, Thomas M. |
author_sort | Spyrantis, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The development of robotic systems has provided an alternative to frame-based stereotactic procedures. The aim of this experimental phantom study was to compare the mechanical accuracy of the Robotic Surgery Assistant (ROSA) and the Leksell stereotactic frame by reducing clinical and procedural factors to a minimum. METHODS: To precisely compare mechanical accuracy, a stereotactic system was chosen as reference for both methods. A thin layer CT scan with an acrylic phantom fixed to the frame and a localizer enabling the software to recognize the coordinate system was performed. For each of the five phantom targets, two different trajectories were planned, resulting in 10 trajectories. A series of five repetitions was performed, each time based on a new CT scan. Hence, 50 trajectories were analyzed for each method. X-rays of the final cannula position were fused with the planning data. The coordinates of the target point and the endpoint of the robot- or frame-guided probe were visually determined using the robotic software. The target point error (TPE) was calculated applying the Euclidian distance. The depth deviation along the trajectory and the lateral deviation were separately calculated. RESULTS: Robotics was significantly more accurate, with an arithmetic TPE mean of 0.53 mm (95% CI 0.41–0.55 mm) compared to 0.72 mm (95% CI 0.63–0.8 mm) in stereotaxy (p < 0.05). In robotics, the mean depth deviation along the trajectory was −0.22 mm (95% CI −0.25 to −0.14 mm). The mean lateral deviation was 0.43 mm (95% CI 0.32–0.49 mm). In frame-based stereotaxy, the mean depth deviation amounted to −0.20 mm (95% CI −0.26 to −0.14 mm), the mean lateral deviation to 0.65 mm (95% CI 0.55–0.74 mm). CONCLUSION: Both the robotic and frame-based approach proved accurate. The robotic procedure showed significantly higher accuracy. For both methods, procedural factors occurring during surgery might have a more relevant impact on overall accuracy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9063629 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90636292022-05-04 Accuracy of Robotic and Frame-Based Stereotactic Neurosurgery in a Phantom Model Spyrantis, Andrea Woebbecke, Tirza Rueß, Daniel Constantinescu, Anne Gierich, Andreas Luyken, Klaus Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle Herrmann, Eva Gessler, Florian Czabanka, Marcus Treuer, Harald Ruge, Maximilian Freiman, Thomas M. Front Neurorobot Neuroscience BACKGROUND: The development of robotic systems has provided an alternative to frame-based stereotactic procedures. The aim of this experimental phantom study was to compare the mechanical accuracy of the Robotic Surgery Assistant (ROSA) and the Leksell stereotactic frame by reducing clinical and procedural factors to a minimum. METHODS: To precisely compare mechanical accuracy, a stereotactic system was chosen as reference for both methods. A thin layer CT scan with an acrylic phantom fixed to the frame and a localizer enabling the software to recognize the coordinate system was performed. For each of the five phantom targets, two different trajectories were planned, resulting in 10 trajectories. A series of five repetitions was performed, each time based on a new CT scan. Hence, 50 trajectories were analyzed for each method. X-rays of the final cannula position were fused with the planning data. The coordinates of the target point and the endpoint of the robot- or frame-guided probe were visually determined using the robotic software. The target point error (TPE) was calculated applying the Euclidian distance. The depth deviation along the trajectory and the lateral deviation were separately calculated. RESULTS: Robotics was significantly more accurate, with an arithmetic TPE mean of 0.53 mm (95% CI 0.41–0.55 mm) compared to 0.72 mm (95% CI 0.63–0.8 mm) in stereotaxy (p < 0.05). In robotics, the mean depth deviation along the trajectory was −0.22 mm (95% CI −0.25 to −0.14 mm). The mean lateral deviation was 0.43 mm (95% CI 0.32–0.49 mm). In frame-based stereotaxy, the mean depth deviation amounted to −0.20 mm (95% CI −0.26 to −0.14 mm), the mean lateral deviation to 0.65 mm (95% CI 0.55–0.74 mm). CONCLUSION: Both the robotic and frame-based approach proved accurate. The robotic procedure showed significantly higher accuracy. For both methods, procedural factors occurring during surgery might have a more relevant impact on overall accuracy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9063629/ /pubmed/35515711 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2022.762317 Text en Copyright © 2022 Spyrantis, Woebbecke, Rueß, Constantinescu, Gierich, Luyken, Visser-Vandewalle, Herrmann, Gessler, Czabanka, Treuer, Ruge and Freiman. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Spyrantis, Andrea Woebbecke, Tirza Rueß, Daniel Constantinescu, Anne Gierich, Andreas Luyken, Klaus Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle Herrmann, Eva Gessler, Florian Czabanka, Marcus Treuer, Harald Ruge, Maximilian Freiman, Thomas M. Accuracy of Robotic and Frame-Based Stereotactic Neurosurgery in a Phantom Model |
title | Accuracy of Robotic and Frame-Based Stereotactic Neurosurgery in a Phantom Model |
title_full | Accuracy of Robotic and Frame-Based Stereotactic Neurosurgery in a Phantom Model |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of Robotic and Frame-Based Stereotactic Neurosurgery in a Phantom Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of Robotic and Frame-Based Stereotactic Neurosurgery in a Phantom Model |
title_short | Accuracy of Robotic and Frame-Based Stereotactic Neurosurgery in a Phantom Model |
title_sort | accuracy of robotic and frame-based stereotactic neurosurgery in a phantom model |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35515711 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2022.762317 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT spyrantisandrea accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel AT woebbecketirza accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel AT rueßdaniel accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel AT constantinescuanne accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel AT gierichandreas accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel AT luykenklaus accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel AT visservandewalleveerle accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel AT herrmanneva accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel AT gesslerflorian accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel AT czabankamarcus accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel AT treuerharald accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel AT rugemaximilian accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel AT freimanthomasm accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel |