Cargando…

Accuracy of Robotic and Frame-Based Stereotactic Neurosurgery in a Phantom Model

BACKGROUND: The development of robotic systems has provided an alternative to frame-based stereotactic procedures. The aim of this experimental phantom study was to compare the mechanical accuracy of the Robotic Surgery Assistant (ROSA) and the Leksell stereotactic frame by reducing clinical and pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spyrantis, Andrea, Woebbecke, Tirza, Rueß, Daniel, Constantinescu, Anne, Gierich, Andreas, Luyken, Klaus, Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle, Herrmann, Eva, Gessler, Florian, Czabanka, Marcus, Treuer, Harald, Ruge, Maximilian, Freiman, Thomas M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35515711
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2022.762317
_version_ 1784699203169026048
author Spyrantis, Andrea
Woebbecke, Tirza
Rueß, Daniel
Constantinescu, Anne
Gierich, Andreas
Luyken, Klaus
Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle
Herrmann, Eva
Gessler, Florian
Czabanka, Marcus
Treuer, Harald
Ruge, Maximilian
Freiman, Thomas M.
author_facet Spyrantis, Andrea
Woebbecke, Tirza
Rueß, Daniel
Constantinescu, Anne
Gierich, Andreas
Luyken, Klaus
Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle
Herrmann, Eva
Gessler, Florian
Czabanka, Marcus
Treuer, Harald
Ruge, Maximilian
Freiman, Thomas M.
author_sort Spyrantis, Andrea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The development of robotic systems has provided an alternative to frame-based stereotactic procedures. The aim of this experimental phantom study was to compare the mechanical accuracy of the Robotic Surgery Assistant (ROSA) and the Leksell stereotactic frame by reducing clinical and procedural factors to a minimum. METHODS: To precisely compare mechanical accuracy, a stereotactic system was chosen as reference for both methods. A thin layer CT scan with an acrylic phantom fixed to the frame and a localizer enabling the software to recognize the coordinate system was performed. For each of the five phantom targets, two different trajectories were planned, resulting in 10 trajectories. A series of five repetitions was performed, each time based on a new CT scan. Hence, 50 trajectories were analyzed for each method. X-rays of the final cannula position were fused with the planning data. The coordinates of the target point and the endpoint of the robot- or frame-guided probe were visually determined using the robotic software. The target point error (TPE) was calculated applying the Euclidian distance. The depth deviation along the trajectory and the lateral deviation were separately calculated. RESULTS: Robotics was significantly more accurate, with an arithmetic TPE mean of 0.53 mm (95% CI 0.41–0.55 mm) compared to 0.72 mm (95% CI 0.63–0.8 mm) in stereotaxy (p < 0.05). In robotics, the mean depth deviation along the trajectory was −0.22 mm (95% CI −0.25 to −0.14 mm). The mean lateral deviation was 0.43 mm (95% CI 0.32–0.49 mm). In frame-based stereotaxy, the mean depth deviation amounted to −0.20 mm (95% CI −0.26 to −0.14 mm), the mean lateral deviation to 0.65 mm (95% CI 0.55–0.74 mm). CONCLUSION: Both the robotic and frame-based approach proved accurate. The robotic procedure showed significantly higher accuracy. For both methods, procedural factors occurring during surgery might have a more relevant impact on overall accuracy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9063629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90636292022-05-04 Accuracy of Robotic and Frame-Based Stereotactic Neurosurgery in a Phantom Model Spyrantis, Andrea Woebbecke, Tirza Rueß, Daniel Constantinescu, Anne Gierich, Andreas Luyken, Klaus Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle Herrmann, Eva Gessler, Florian Czabanka, Marcus Treuer, Harald Ruge, Maximilian Freiman, Thomas M. Front Neurorobot Neuroscience BACKGROUND: The development of robotic systems has provided an alternative to frame-based stereotactic procedures. The aim of this experimental phantom study was to compare the mechanical accuracy of the Robotic Surgery Assistant (ROSA) and the Leksell stereotactic frame by reducing clinical and procedural factors to a minimum. METHODS: To precisely compare mechanical accuracy, a stereotactic system was chosen as reference for both methods. A thin layer CT scan with an acrylic phantom fixed to the frame and a localizer enabling the software to recognize the coordinate system was performed. For each of the five phantom targets, two different trajectories were planned, resulting in 10 trajectories. A series of five repetitions was performed, each time based on a new CT scan. Hence, 50 trajectories were analyzed for each method. X-rays of the final cannula position were fused with the planning data. The coordinates of the target point and the endpoint of the robot- or frame-guided probe were visually determined using the robotic software. The target point error (TPE) was calculated applying the Euclidian distance. The depth deviation along the trajectory and the lateral deviation were separately calculated. RESULTS: Robotics was significantly more accurate, with an arithmetic TPE mean of 0.53 mm (95% CI 0.41–0.55 mm) compared to 0.72 mm (95% CI 0.63–0.8 mm) in stereotaxy (p < 0.05). In robotics, the mean depth deviation along the trajectory was −0.22 mm (95% CI −0.25 to −0.14 mm). The mean lateral deviation was 0.43 mm (95% CI 0.32–0.49 mm). In frame-based stereotaxy, the mean depth deviation amounted to −0.20 mm (95% CI −0.26 to −0.14 mm), the mean lateral deviation to 0.65 mm (95% CI 0.55–0.74 mm). CONCLUSION: Both the robotic and frame-based approach proved accurate. The robotic procedure showed significantly higher accuracy. For both methods, procedural factors occurring during surgery might have a more relevant impact on overall accuracy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9063629/ /pubmed/35515711 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2022.762317 Text en Copyright © 2022 Spyrantis, Woebbecke, Rueß, Constantinescu, Gierich, Luyken, Visser-Vandewalle, Herrmann, Gessler, Czabanka, Treuer, Ruge and Freiman. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Spyrantis, Andrea
Woebbecke, Tirza
Rueß, Daniel
Constantinescu, Anne
Gierich, Andreas
Luyken, Klaus
Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle
Herrmann, Eva
Gessler, Florian
Czabanka, Marcus
Treuer, Harald
Ruge, Maximilian
Freiman, Thomas M.
Accuracy of Robotic and Frame-Based Stereotactic Neurosurgery in a Phantom Model
title Accuracy of Robotic and Frame-Based Stereotactic Neurosurgery in a Phantom Model
title_full Accuracy of Robotic and Frame-Based Stereotactic Neurosurgery in a Phantom Model
title_fullStr Accuracy of Robotic and Frame-Based Stereotactic Neurosurgery in a Phantom Model
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Robotic and Frame-Based Stereotactic Neurosurgery in a Phantom Model
title_short Accuracy of Robotic and Frame-Based Stereotactic Neurosurgery in a Phantom Model
title_sort accuracy of robotic and frame-based stereotactic neurosurgery in a phantom model
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9063629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35515711
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2022.762317
work_keys_str_mv AT spyrantisandrea accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel
AT woebbecketirza accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel
AT rueßdaniel accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel
AT constantinescuanne accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel
AT gierichandreas accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel
AT luykenklaus accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel
AT visservandewalleveerle accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel
AT herrmanneva accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel
AT gesslerflorian accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel
AT czabankamarcus accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel
AT treuerharald accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel
AT rugemaximilian accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel
AT freimanthomasm accuracyofroboticandframebasedstereotacticneurosurgeryinaphantommodel