Cargando…

Cognitive factors influenced physical distancing adherence during the COVID-19 pandemic in a population-specific way

Even early in the COVID-19 pandemic, adherence to physical distancing measures was variable, exposing some communities to elevated risk. While cognitive factors from the Health Belief Model (HBM) and resilience correlate with compliance with physical distancing, external conditions may preclude full...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tarr, Gillian A. M., Morris, Keeley J., Harding, Alyson B., Jacobs, Samuel, Smith, M. Kumi, Church, Timothy R., Berman, Jesse D., Rau, Austin, Ashida, Sato, Ramirez, Marizen R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9064111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35503754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267261
_version_ 1784699298365046784
author Tarr, Gillian A. M.
Morris, Keeley J.
Harding, Alyson B.
Jacobs, Samuel
Smith, M. Kumi
Church, Timothy R.
Berman, Jesse D.
Rau, Austin
Ashida, Sato
Ramirez, Marizen R.
author_facet Tarr, Gillian A. M.
Morris, Keeley J.
Harding, Alyson B.
Jacobs, Samuel
Smith, M. Kumi
Church, Timothy R.
Berman, Jesse D.
Rau, Austin
Ashida, Sato
Ramirez, Marizen R.
author_sort Tarr, Gillian A. M.
collection PubMed
description Even early in the COVID-19 pandemic, adherence to physical distancing measures was variable, exposing some communities to elevated risk. While cognitive factors from the Health Belief Model (HBM) and resilience correlate with compliance with physical distancing, external conditions may preclude full compliance with physical distancing guidelines. Our objective was to identify HBM and resilience constructs that could be used to improve adherence to physical distancing even when full compliance is not possible. We examined adherence as expressed through 7-day non-work, non-household contact rates in two cohorts: 1) adults in households with children from Minnesota and Iowa; and 2) adults ≥50 years-old from Minnesota, one-third of whom had Parkinson’s disease. We identified multiple cognitive factors associated with physical distancing adherence, specifically perceived severity, benefits, self-efficacy, and barriers. However, the magnitude, and occasionally the direction, of these associations was population-dependent. In Cohort 1, perceived self-efficacy for remaining 6-feet from others was associated with a 29% lower contact rate (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.65, 0.77). This finding was consistent across all race/ethnicity and income groups we examined. The barriers to adherence of having a child in childcare and having financial concerns had the largest effects among individuals from marginalized racial and ethnic groups and high-income households. In Cohort 2, self-efficacy to quarantine/isolate was associated with a 23% decrease in contacts (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.66, 0.89), but upon stratification by education level, the association was only present for those with at least a Bachelor’s degree. Education also modified the effect of the barrier to adherence leaving home for work, increasing contacts among those with a Bachelor’s degree and reducing contacts among those without. Our findings suggest that public health messaging tailored to the identified cognitive factors has the potential to improve physical distancing adherence, but population-specific needs must be considered to maximize effectiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9064111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90641112022-05-04 Cognitive factors influenced physical distancing adherence during the COVID-19 pandemic in a population-specific way Tarr, Gillian A. M. Morris, Keeley J. Harding, Alyson B. Jacobs, Samuel Smith, M. Kumi Church, Timothy R. Berman, Jesse D. Rau, Austin Ashida, Sato Ramirez, Marizen R. PLoS One Research Article Even early in the COVID-19 pandemic, adherence to physical distancing measures was variable, exposing some communities to elevated risk. While cognitive factors from the Health Belief Model (HBM) and resilience correlate with compliance with physical distancing, external conditions may preclude full compliance with physical distancing guidelines. Our objective was to identify HBM and resilience constructs that could be used to improve adherence to physical distancing even when full compliance is not possible. We examined adherence as expressed through 7-day non-work, non-household contact rates in two cohorts: 1) adults in households with children from Minnesota and Iowa; and 2) adults ≥50 years-old from Minnesota, one-third of whom had Parkinson’s disease. We identified multiple cognitive factors associated with physical distancing adherence, specifically perceived severity, benefits, self-efficacy, and barriers. However, the magnitude, and occasionally the direction, of these associations was population-dependent. In Cohort 1, perceived self-efficacy for remaining 6-feet from others was associated with a 29% lower contact rate (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.65, 0.77). This finding was consistent across all race/ethnicity and income groups we examined. The barriers to adherence of having a child in childcare and having financial concerns had the largest effects among individuals from marginalized racial and ethnic groups and high-income households. In Cohort 2, self-efficacy to quarantine/isolate was associated with a 23% decrease in contacts (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.66, 0.89), but upon stratification by education level, the association was only present for those with at least a Bachelor’s degree. Education also modified the effect of the barrier to adherence leaving home for work, increasing contacts among those with a Bachelor’s degree and reducing contacts among those without. Our findings suggest that public health messaging tailored to the identified cognitive factors has the potential to improve physical distancing adherence, but population-specific needs must be considered to maximize effectiveness. Public Library of Science 2022-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9064111/ /pubmed/35503754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267261 Text en © 2022 Tarr et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tarr, Gillian A. M.
Morris, Keeley J.
Harding, Alyson B.
Jacobs, Samuel
Smith, M. Kumi
Church, Timothy R.
Berman, Jesse D.
Rau, Austin
Ashida, Sato
Ramirez, Marizen R.
Cognitive factors influenced physical distancing adherence during the COVID-19 pandemic in a population-specific way
title Cognitive factors influenced physical distancing adherence during the COVID-19 pandemic in a population-specific way
title_full Cognitive factors influenced physical distancing adherence during the COVID-19 pandemic in a population-specific way
title_fullStr Cognitive factors influenced physical distancing adherence during the COVID-19 pandemic in a population-specific way
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive factors influenced physical distancing adherence during the COVID-19 pandemic in a population-specific way
title_short Cognitive factors influenced physical distancing adherence during the COVID-19 pandemic in a population-specific way
title_sort cognitive factors influenced physical distancing adherence during the covid-19 pandemic in a population-specific way
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9064111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35503754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267261
work_keys_str_mv AT tarrgillianam cognitivefactorsinfluencedphysicaldistancingadherenceduringthecovid19pandemicinapopulationspecificway
AT morriskeeleyj cognitivefactorsinfluencedphysicaldistancingadherenceduringthecovid19pandemicinapopulationspecificway
AT hardingalysonb cognitivefactorsinfluencedphysicaldistancingadherenceduringthecovid19pandemicinapopulationspecificway
AT jacobssamuel cognitivefactorsinfluencedphysicaldistancingadherenceduringthecovid19pandemicinapopulationspecificway
AT smithmkumi cognitivefactorsinfluencedphysicaldistancingadherenceduringthecovid19pandemicinapopulationspecificway
AT churchtimothyr cognitivefactorsinfluencedphysicaldistancingadherenceduringthecovid19pandemicinapopulationspecificway
AT bermanjessed cognitivefactorsinfluencedphysicaldistancingadherenceduringthecovid19pandemicinapopulationspecificway
AT rauaustin cognitivefactorsinfluencedphysicaldistancingadherenceduringthecovid19pandemicinapopulationspecificway
AT ashidasato cognitivefactorsinfluencedphysicaldistancingadherenceduringthecovid19pandemicinapopulationspecificway
AT ramirezmarizenr cognitivefactorsinfluencedphysicaldistancingadherenceduringthecovid19pandemicinapopulationspecificway