Cargando…

Near-Peer Teaching in Radiation Oncology: a Proof of Principle Study for Learning Treatment Planning

Radiotherapy techniques are expanding in range and complexity; therefore, protecting learning environments where residents nurture treatment planning skills is critical. The evidence base for ‘near-peer’ teaching (NPT), where professionals at a similar career stage assist in each other’s learning, i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walls, Gerard M., Ellis, Rachel, Lynch, Sophie, Flynn, Margaret A., McCann, Gemma, Jellett, Lucy J., Harrison, Claire
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9064121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35505171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-022-02150-2
_version_ 1784699300302815232
author Walls, Gerard M.
Ellis, Rachel
Lynch, Sophie
Flynn, Margaret A.
McCann, Gemma
Jellett, Lucy J.
Harrison, Claire
author_facet Walls, Gerard M.
Ellis, Rachel
Lynch, Sophie
Flynn, Margaret A.
McCann, Gemma
Jellett, Lucy J.
Harrison, Claire
author_sort Walls, Gerard M.
collection PubMed
description Radiotherapy techniques are expanding in range and complexity; therefore, protecting learning environments where residents nurture treatment planning skills is critical. The evidence base for ‘near-peer’ teaching (NPT), where professionals at a similar career stage assist in each other’s learning, is growing in hospital-based disciplines, but has not been reported in radiation oncology. The feasibility of a resident-led teaching programme for developing treatment planning skills was investigated herein with quality improvement (QI) methodology. Following consultation with attendings (n = 10) and all residents (n = 17) at the two cancer centres in the region, a regular NPT session focused on planning skills was initiated at the largest centre, with video-linking to the second centre. Tutorials were case-based and pitched at the level of qualifying examinations. Plan–Do–Study–Act (PDSA) cycles were designed based on primary and secondary improvement drivers derived by group consensus among residents, with tutorials adopted accordingly. Participation, content, and satisfaction were monitored for 20 months. Six PDSA cycles reformed the tutorial format, leading to logistical and pedagogical benefits including interprofessional contributions and enhanced interactivity. Tutorials occurred on 85% prescribed occasions (n = 45) during the subsequent 18-month follow-up, with 25 distinct tumour sites featured. Resident participation and satisfaction increased, independent of resident seniority. Tutorials were paused for the first 2 months of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic only. A high-quality and cost-effective regional, trainee-led teaching programme on treatment planning was feasible and cost-effective in this study. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13187-022-02150-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9064121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90641212022-05-04 Near-Peer Teaching in Radiation Oncology: a Proof of Principle Study for Learning Treatment Planning Walls, Gerard M. Ellis, Rachel Lynch, Sophie Flynn, Margaret A. McCann, Gemma Jellett, Lucy J. Harrison, Claire J Cancer Educ Article Radiotherapy techniques are expanding in range and complexity; therefore, protecting learning environments where residents nurture treatment planning skills is critical. The evidence base for ‘near-peer’ teaching (NPT), where professionals at a similar career stage assist in each other’s learning, is growing in hospital-based disciplines, but has not been reported in radiation oncology. The feasibility of a resident-led teaching programme for developing treatment planning skills was investigated herein with quality improvement (QI) methodology. Following consultation with attendings (n = 10) and all residents (n = 17) at the two cancer centres in the region, a regular NPT session focused on planning skills was initiated at the largest centre, with video-linking to the second centre. Tutorials were case-based and pitched at the level of qualifying examinations. Plan–Do–Study–Act (PDSA) cycles were designed based on primary and secondary improvement drivers derived by group consensus among residents, with tutorials adopted accordingly. Participation, content, and satisfaction were monitored for 20 months. Six PDSA cycles reformed the tutorial format, leading to logistical and pedagogical benefits including interprofessional contributions and enhanced interactivity. Tutorials occurred on 85% prescribed occasions (n = 45) during the subsequent 18-month follow-up, with 25 distinct tumour sites featured. Resident participation and satisfaction increased, independent of resident seniority. Tutorials were paused for the first 2 months of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic only. A high-quality and cost-effective regional, trainee-led teaching programme on treatment planning was feasible and cost-effective in this study. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13187-022-02150-2. Springer US 2022-05-03 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9064121/ /pubmed/35505171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-022-02150-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Walls, Gerard M.
Ellis, Rachel
Lynch, Sophie
Flynn, Margaret A.
McCann, Gemma
Jellett, Lucy J.
Harrison, Claire
Near-Peer Teaching in Radiation Oncology: a Proof of Principle Study for Learning Treatment Planning
title Near-Peer Teaching in Radiation Oncology: a Proof of Principle Study for Learning Treatment Planning
title_full Near-Peer Teaching in Radiation Oncology: a Proof of Principle Study for Learning Treatment Planning
title_fullStr Near-Peer Teaching in Radiation Oncology: a Proof of Principle Study for Learning Treatment Planning
title_full_unstemmed Near-Peer Teaching in Radiation Oncology: a Proof of Principle Study for Learning Treatment Planning
title_short Near-Peer Teaching in Radiation Oncology: a Proof of Principle Study for Learning Treatment Planning
title_sort near-peer teaching in radiation oncology: a proof of principle study for learning treatment planning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9064121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35505171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13187-022-02150-2
work_keys_str_mv AT wallsgerardm nearpeerteachinginradiationoncologyaproofofprinciplestudyforlearningtreatmentplanning
AT ellisrachel nearpeerteachinginradiationoncologyaproofofprinciplestudyforlearningtreatmentplanning
AT lynchsophie nearpeerteachinginradiationoncologyaproofofprinciplestudyforlearningtreatmentplanning
AT flynnmargareta nearpeerteachinginradiationoncologyaproofofprinciplestudyforlearningtreatmentplanning
AT mccanngemma nearpeerteachinginradiationoncologyaproofofprinciplestudyforlearningtreatmentplanning
AT jellettlucyj nearpeerteachinginradiationoncologyaproofofprinciplestudyforlearningtreatmentplanning
AT harrisonclaire nearpeerteachinginradiationoncologyaproofofprinciplestudyforlearningtreatmentplanning