Cargando…

Comparison Between PE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF in the Treatment of Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the early clinical effect of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PE-TLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) surgery in the treatment of middle-aged and elderly patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Qi, Meng, Feifan, Chen, Ming, Lu, Xiangjun, Zhao, Deyuan, Wu, Dongze, Wang, Tingting, Qin, Rujie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9064176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35516460
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S371635
_version_ 1784699313357586432
author Han, Qi
Meng, Feifan
Chen, Ming
Lu, Xiangjun
Zhao, Deyuan
Wu, Dongze
Wang, Tingting
Qin, Rujie
author_facet Han, Qi
Meng, Feifan
Chen, Ming
Lu, Xiangjun
Zhao, Deyuan
Wu, Dongze
Wang, Tingting
Qin, Rujie
author_sort Han, Qi
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the early clinical effect of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PE-TLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) surgery in the treatment of middle-aged and elderly patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation accompanied by lumbar instability. METHODS: From January 2019 to June 2020, a total of 82 consecutive patients were categorised into PE-TLIF group and MIS-TLIF group based on different surgical methods. The visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, perioperative objective serological index, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, time to back to work or normal life, and Modified MacNab score were used as the evaluation indexes. The differences between the two groups were analyzed and the clinical effects were compared. RESULTS: The VAS back pain of PE-TLIF group was decreased compared to that of MIS-TLIF group in the postoperative 1 week and 1 month. The operative time in PE-TLIF group was obviously longer than that in MIS-TLIF group. The hospital stay was significantly shorter in PE-TLIF group than that in MIS-TLIF group. More intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage were recorded in MIS-TLIF group. Compared with MIS-TLIF, PE-TLIF surgery was associated with a shorter time to ambulation after surgery and a shorter time to back to work or normal life. Significant statistical differences were observed in IL-6, CRP, and CK on postoperative 3 days between the two groups. CONCLUSION: For middle-aged and elderly patients, PE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF surgery both have obvious clinical efficacy and safety. However, with less intraoperative blood loss, shorter recovery time and less injury to the patients, people undergoing PE-TLIF surgery can return to work or normal life faster. It is speculated that PE-TLIF has a higher incidence of complications and recurrence rate than that MIS-TLIF. PE-TLIF may be a better choice for middle-aged and elderly patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9064176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90641762022-05-04 Comparison Between PE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF in the Treatment of Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation Han, Qi Meng, Feifan Chen, Ming Lu, Xiangjun Zhao, Deyuan Wu, Dongze Wang, Tingting Qin, Rujie J Pain Res Original Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the early clinical effect of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PE-TLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) surgery in the treatment of middle-aged and elderly patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation accompanied by lumbar instability. METHODS: From January 2019 to June 2020, a total of 82 consecutive patients were categorised into PE-TLIF group and MIS-TLIF group based on different surgical methods. The visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, perioperative objective serological index, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, time to back to work or normal life, and Modified MacNab score were used as the evaluation indexes. The differences between the two groups were analyzed and the clinical effects were compared. RESULTS: The VAS back pain of PE-TLIF group was decreased compared to that of MIS-TLIF group in the postoperative 1 week and 1 month. The operative time in PE-TLIF group was obviously longer than that in MIS-TLIF group. The hospital stay was significantly shorter in PE-TLIF group than that in MIS-TLIF group. More intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drainage were recorded in MIS-TLIF group. Compared with MIS-TLIF, PE-TLIF surgery was associated with a shorter time to ambulation after surgery and a shorter time to back to work or normal life. Significant statistical differences were observed in IL-6, CRP, and CK on postoperative 3 days between the two groups. CONCLUSION: For middle-aged and elderly patients, PE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF surgery both have obvious clinical efficacy and safety. However, with less intraoperative blood loss, shorter recovery time and less injury to the patients, people undergoing PE-TLIF surgery can return to work or normal life faster. It is speculated that PE-TLIF has a higher incidence of complications and recurrence rate than that MIS-TLIF. PE-TLIF may be a better choice for middle-aged and elderly patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation. Dove 2022-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9064176/ /pubmed/35516460 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S371635 Text en © 2022 Han et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Han, Qi
Meng, Feifan
Chen, Ming
Lu, Xiangjun
Zhao, Deyuan
Wu, Dongze
Wang, Tingting
Qin, Rujie
Comparison Between PE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF in the Treatment of Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation
title Comparison Between PE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF in the Treatment of Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation
title_full Comparison Between PE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF in the Treatment of Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation
title_fullStr Comparison Between PE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF in the Treatment of Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison Between PE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF in the Treatment of Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation
title_short Comparison Between PE-TLIF and MIS-TLIF in the Treatment of Middle-Aged and Elderly Patients with Single-Level Lumbar Disc Herniation
title_sort comparison between pe-tlif and mis-tlif in the treatment of middle-aged and elderly patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9064176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35516460
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S371635
work_keys_str_mv AT hanqi comparisonbetweenpetlifandmistlifinthetreatmentofmiddleagedandelderlypatientswithsinglelevellumbardischerniation
AT mengfeifan comparisonbetweenpetlifandmistlifinthetreatmentofmiddleagedandelderlypatientswithsinglelevellumbardischerniation
AT chenming comparisonbetweenpetlifandmistlifinthetreatmentofmiddleagedandelderlypatientswithsinglelevellumbardischerniation
AT luxiangjun comparisonbetweenpetlifandmistlifinthetreatmentofmiddleagedandelderlypatientswithsinglelevellumbardischerniation
AT zhaodeyuan comparisonbetweenpetlifandmistlifinthetreatmentofmiddleagedandelderlypatientswithsinglelevellumbardischerniation
AT wudongze comparisonbetweenpetlifandmistlifinthetreatmentofmiddleagedandelderlypatientswithsinglelevellumbardischerniation
AT wangtingting comparisonbetweenpetlifandmistlifinthetreatmentofmiddleagedandelderlypatientswithsinglelevellumbardischerniation
AT qinrujie comparisonbetweenpetlifandmistlifinthetreatmentofmiddleagedandelderlypatientswithsinglelevellumbardischerniation