Cargando…
Fabrication of PP hollow fiber membrane via TIPS using environmentally friendly diluents and its CO(2) degassing performance
CO(2) removal is an essential water purification process in many fields, such as petrochemical production and thermal power generation. It is challenging to remove low concentrations of CO(2) from RO effluent water. The core component of the membrane degassing technique is a high-performance hydroph...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society of Chemistry
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9065007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35516899 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c9ra02766a |
Sumario: | CO(2) removal is an essential water purification process in many fields, such as petrochemical production and thermal power generation. It is challenging to remove low concentrations of CO(2) from RO effluent water. The core component of the membrane degassing technique is a high-performance hydrophobic microporous membrane. Polypropylene (PP) membranes were prepared with environmentally friendly binary diluents via thermally induced phase separation. Firstly, the effects of PP concentration on the phase diagram, flat sheet membrane structure and mechanical properties were studied to optimize the PP content for a hollow fiber membrane (HFM). The PP HFM showed a sponge-like cross-sectional structure without any dense skin layer, a large loading force and breaking elongation, and a narrow pore size distribution with a mean pore size of 0.16 μm. The as-fabricated PP HFM module was applied for CO(2) removal from RO effluent water from a petrochemical plant. A higher water temperature and vacuum degree facilitated CO(2) removal. Increasing the effective membrane length enhanced degassing efficiency. Increasing the water flow rate increased CO(2) degassing flux, but simultaneously decreased degassing efficiency. When the water flow rate increased from 20 mL min(−1) to 63 mL min(−1), although the effective membrane length increased from 3 m to 4.8 m for the best degassing efficiency of 88%, the amount of treated water increased by 3.15 times. The declined CO(2) concentration in the outlet water was 1.6 mg L(−1). |
---|