Cargando…

Cone-beam computed tomographic comparison of chin symphysis bone particles and allograft versus iliac crest bone graft alone for reconstruction of alveolar bone defects in cleft patients

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare morbidities and duration of surgery, as well as bone formation in alveolar defects reconstructed with symphysis bone combined with allograft and iliac crest bone graft in patients with cleft palate. Patients and Methods This randomized clinical trial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Attar, Bijan Movahedian, Soltani, Parisa, Davari, Davood, Mehdizadeh, Mojdeh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9065643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35491139
http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2022.48.2.85
_version_ 1784699628653903872
author Attar, Bijan Movahedian
Soltani, Parisa
Davari, Davood
Mehdizadeh, Mojdeh
author_facet Attar, Bijan Movahedian
Soltani, Parisa
Davari, Davood
Mehdizadeh, Mojdeh
author_sort Attar, Bijan Movahedian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare morbidities and duration of surgery, as well as bone formation in alveolar defects reconstructed with symphysis bone combined with allograft and iliac crest bone graft in patients with cleft palate. Patients and Methods This randomized clinical trial was performed with 22 patients with unilateral alveolar cleft with a follow-up period of 12 months. In 12 patients, alveolar defects were reconstructed with chin bone graft plus allograft (Group A), while for the other 10 patients, iliac bone crest was used as donor site (Group B). Duration of surgery as well as occurrence of morbidities and complications were recorded. In addition, cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) scans were performed before surgery and 12 months after surgical procedures in order to compare bone formation between the two groups. RESULTS: Postoperative CBCT demonstrated a mean bone fill percentage of 76.9% of the alveolar defect in Group A, compared with 77.0% in Group B. Paresthesia in the lower lip or chin did not occur in any patients of Group A. The mean duration of the surgical process was significantly shorter for Group A (40 minutes vs 76 minutes, P<0.001). In addition, patients in Group A regained normal gait faster than patients in Group B (1 day vs 9.5 days). CONCLUSION: Mandibular symphysis bone graft in combination with allograft results in favorable outcomes in patients with unilateral alveolar clefts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9065643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90656432022-05-11 Cone-beam computed tomographic comparison of chin symphysis bone particles and allograft versus iliac crest bone graft alone for reconstruction of alveolar bone defects in cleft patients Attar, Bijan Movahedian Soltani, Parisa Davari, Davood Mehdizadeh, Mojdeh J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg Original Article OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare morbidities and duration of surgery, as well as bone formation in alveolar defects reconstructed with symphysis bone combined with allograft and iliac crest bone graft in patients with cleft palate. Patients and Methods This randomized clinical trial was performed with 22 patients with unilateral alveolar cleft with a follow-up period of 12 months. In 12 patients, alveolar defects were reconstructed with chin bone graft plus allograft (Group A), while for the other 10 patients, iliac bone crest was used as donor site (Group B). Duration of surgery as well as occurrence of morbidities and complications were recorded. In addition, cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) scans were performed before surgery and 12 months after surgical procedures in order to compare bone formation between the two groups. RESULTS: Postoperative CBCT demonstrated a mean bone fill percentage of 76.9% of the alveolar defect in Group A, compared with 77.0% in Group B. Paresthesia in the lower lip or chin did not occur in any patients of Group A. The mean duration of the surgical process was significantly shorter for Group A (40 minutes vs 76 minutes, P<0.001). In addition, patients in Group A regained normal gait faster than patients in Group B (1 day vs 9.5 days). CONCLUSION: Mandibular symphysis bone graft in combination with allograft results in favorable outcomes in patients with unilateral alveolar clefts. The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 2022-04-30 2022-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9065643/ /pubmed/35491139 http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2022.48.2.85 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Attar, Bijan Movahedian
Soltani, Parisa
Davari, Davood
Mehdizadeh, Mojdeh
Cone-beam computed tomographic comparison of chin symphysis bone particles and allograft versus iliac crest bone graft alone for reconstruction of alveolar bone defects in cleft patients
title Cone-beam computed tomographic comparison of chin symphysis bone particles and allograft versus iliac crest bone graft alone for reconstruction of alveolar bone defects in cleft patients
title_full Cone-beam computed tomographic comparison of chin symphysis bone particles and allograft versus iliac crest bone graft alone for reconstruction of alveolar bone defects in cleft patients
title_fullStr Cone-beam computed tomographic comparison of chin symphysis bone particles and allograft versus iliac crest bone graft alone for reconstruction of alveolar bone defects in cleft patients
title_full_unstemmed Cone-beam computed tomographic comparison of chin symphysis bone particles and allograft versus iliac crest bone graft alone for reconstruction of alveolar bone defects in cleft patients
title_short Cone-beam computed tomographic comparison of chin symphysis bone particles and allograft versus iliac crest bone graft alone for reconstruction of alveolar bone defects in cleft patients
title_sort cone-beam computed tomographic comparison of chin symphysis bone particles and allograft versus iliac crest bone graft alone for reconstruction of alveolar bone defects in cleft patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9065643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35491139
http://dx.doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2022.48.2.85
work_keys_str_mv AT attarbijanmovahedian conebeamcomputedtomographiccomparisonofchinsymphysisboneparticlesandallograftversusiliaccrestbonegraftaloneforreconstructionofalveolarbonedefectsincleftpatients
AT soltaniparisa conebeamcomputedtomographiccomparisonofchinsymphysisboneparticlesandallograftversusiliaccrestbonegraftaloneforreconstructionofalveolarbonedefectsincleftpatients
AT davaridavood conebeamcomputedtomographiccomparisonofchinsymphysisboneparticlesandallograftversusiliaccrestbonegraftaloneforreconstructionofalveolarbonedefectsincleftpatients
AT mehdizadehmojdeh conebeamcomputedtomographiccomparisonofchinsymphysisboneparticlesandallograftversusiliaccrestbonegraftaloneforreconstructionofalveolarbonedefectsincleftpatients