Cargando…

Very early invasive angiography versus standard of care in higher-risk non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: study protocol for the prospective multicentre randomised controlled RAPID N-STEMI trial

BACKGROUND: There are a paucity of randomised data on the optimal timing of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in higher-risk patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (N-STEMI). International guideline recommendations for early ICA are primarily based on retrospective subgroup analyses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kite, Thomas A, Banning, Amerjeet S, Ladwiniec, Andrew, Gale, Chris P, Greenwood, John P, Dalby, Miles, Hobson, Rachel, Barber, Shaun, Parker, Emma, Berry, Colin, Flather, Marcus D, Curzen, Nick, Banning, Adrian P, McCann, Gerry P, Gershlick, Anthony H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9066091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35504645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055878
_version_ 1784699730498945024
author Kite, Thomas A
Banning, Amerjeet S
Ladwiniec, Andrew
Gale, Chris P
Greenwood, John P
Dalby, Miles
Hobson, Rachel
Barber, Shaun
Parker, Emma
Berry, Colin
Flather, Marcus D
Curzen, Nick
Banning, Adrian P
McCann, Gerry P
Gershlick, Anthony H
author_facet Kite, Thomas A
Banning, Amerjeet S
Ladwiniec, Andrew
Gale, Chris P
Greenwood, John P
Dalby, Miles
Hobson, Rachel
Barber, Shaun
Parker, Emma
Berry, Colin
Flather, Marcus D
Curzen, Nick
Banning, Adrian P
McCann, Gerry P
Gershlick, Anthony H
author_sort Kite, Thomas A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are a paucity of randomised data on the optimal timing of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in higher-risk patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (N-STEMI). International guideline recommendations for early ICA are primarily based on retrospective subgroup analyses of neutral trials. AIMS: The RAPID N-STEMI trial aims to determine whether very early percutaneous revascularisation improves clinical outcomes as compared with a standard of care strategy in higher-risk N-STEMI patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: RAPID N-STEMI is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, randomised-controlled, pragmatic strategy trial. Higher-risk N-STEMI patients, as defined by Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events 2.0 score ≥118, or >90 with at least one additional high-risk feature, were randomised to either: very early ICA±revascularisation or standard of care timing of ICA±revascularisation. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants with at least one of the following events (all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction and hospital admission for heart failure) at 12 months. Key secondary outcomes include major bleeding and stroke. A hypothesis generating cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) substudy will provide mechanistic data on infarct size, myocardial salvage and residual ischaemia post percutaneous coronary intervention. On 7 April 2021, the sponsor discontinued enrolment due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and lower than expected event rates. 425 patients were enrolled, and 61 patients underwent CMR. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has been reviewed and approved by the East of England Cambridge East Research Ethics Committee (18/EE/0222). The study results will be submitted for publication within 6 months of completion. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03707314; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9066091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90660912022-05-06 Very early invasive angiography versus standard of care in higher-risk non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: study protocol for the prospective multicentre randomised controlled RAPID N-STEMI trial Kite, Thomas A Banning, Amerjeet S Ladwiniec, Andrew Gale, Chris P Greenwood, John P Dalby, Miles Hobson, Rachel Barber, Shaun Parker, Emma Berry, Colin Flather, Marcus D Curzen, Nick Banning, Adrian P McCann, Gerry P Gershlick, Anthony H BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: There are a paucity of randomised data on the optimal timing of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in higher-risk patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (N-STEMI). International guideline recommendations for early ICA are primarily based on retrospective subgroup analyses of neutral trials. AIMS: The RAPID N-STEMI trial aims to determine whether very early percutaneous revascularisation improves clinical outcomes as compared with a standard of care strategy in higher-risk N-STEMI patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: RAPID N-STEMI is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, randomised-controlled, pragmatic strategy trial. Higher-risk N-STEMI patients, as defined by Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events 2.0 score ≥118, or >90 with at least one additional high-risk feature, were randomised to either: very early ICA±revascularisation or standard of care timing of ICA±revascularisation. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants with at least one of the following events (all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction and hospital admission for heart failure) at 12 months. Key secondary outcomes include major bleeding and stroke. A hypothesis generating cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) substudy will provide mechanistic data on infarct size, myocardial salvage and residual ischaemia post percutaneous coronary intervention. On 7 April 2021, the sponsor discontinued enrolment due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and lower than expected event rates. 425 patients were enrolled, and 61 patients underwent CMR. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has been reviewed and approved by the East of England Cambridge East Research Ethics Committee (18/EE/0222). The study results will be submitted for publication within 6 months of completion. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03707314; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9066091/ /pubmed/35504645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055878 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Kite, Thomas A
Banning, Amerjeet S
Ladwiniec, Andrew
Gale, Chris P
Greenwood, John P
Dalby, Miles
Hobson, Rachel
Barber, Shaun
Parker, Emma
Berry, Colin
Flather, Marcus D
Curzen, Nick
Banning, Adrian P
McCann, Gerry P
Gershlick, Anthony H
Very early invasive angiography versus standard of care in higher-risk non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: study protocol for the prospective multicentre randomised controlled RAPID N-STEMI trial
title Very early invasive angiography versus standard of care in higher-risk non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: study protocol for the prospective multicentre randomised controlled RAPID N-STEMI trial
title_full Very early invasive angiography versus standard of care in higher-risk non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: study protocol for the prospective multicentre randomised controlled RAPID N-STEMI trial
title_fullStr Very early invasive angiography versus standard of care in higher-risk non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: study protocol for the prospective multicentre randomised controlled RAPID N-STEMI trial
title_full_unstemmed Very early invasive angiography versus standard of care in higher-risk non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: study protocol for the prospective multicentre randomised controlled RAPID N-STEMI trial
title_short Very early invasive angiography versus standard of care in higher-risk non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: study protocol for the prospective multicentre randomised controlled RAPID N-STEMI trial
title_sort very early invasive angiography versus standard of care in higher-risk non-st elevation myocardial infarction: study protocol for the prospective multicentre randomised controlled rapid n-stemi trial
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9066091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35504645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055878
work_keys_str_mv AT kitethomasa veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial
AT banningamerjeets veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial
AT ladwiniecandrew veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial
AT galechrisp veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial
AT greenwoodjohnp veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial
AT dalbymiles veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial
AT hobsonrachel veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial
AT barbershaun veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial
AT parkeremma veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial
AT berrycolin veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial
AT flathermarcusd veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial
AT curzennick veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial
AT banningadrianp veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial
AT mccanngerryp veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial
AT gershlickanthonyh veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial