Cargando…
Very early invasive angiography versus standard of care in higher-risk non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: study protocol for the prospective multicentre randomised controlled RAPID N-STEMI trial
BACKGROUND: There are a paucity of randomised data on the optimal timing of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in higher-risk patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (N-STEMI). International guideline recommendations for early ICA are primarily based on retrospective subgroup analyses...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9066091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35504645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055878 |
_version_ | 1784699730498945024 |
---|---|
author | Kite, Thomas A Banning, Amerjeet S Ladwiniec, Andrew Gale, Chris P Greenwood, John P Dalby, Miles Hobson, Rachel Barber, Shaun Parker, Emma Berry, Colin Flather, Marcus D Curzen, Nick Banning, Adrian P McCann, Gerry P Gershlick, Anthony H |
author_facet | Kite, Thomas A Banning, Amerjeet S Ladwiniec, Andrew Gale, Chris P Greenwood, John P Dalby, Miles Hobson, Rachel Barber, Shaun Parker, Emma Berry, Colin Flather, Marcus D Curzen, Nick Banning, Adrian P McCann, Gerry P Gershlick, Anthony H |
author_sort | Kite, Thomas A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There are a paucity of randomised data on the optimal timing of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in higher-risk patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (N-STEMI). International guideline recommendations for early ICA are primarily based on retrospective subgroup analyses of neutral trials. AIMS: The RAPID N-STEMI trial aims to determine whether very early percutaneous revascularisation improves clinical outcomes as compared with a standard of care strategy in higher-risk N-STEMI patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: RAPID N-STEMI is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, randomised-controlled, pragmatic strategy trial. Higher-risk N-STEMI patients, as defined by Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events 2.0 score ≥118, or >90 with at least one additional high-risk feature, were randomised to either: very early ICA±revascularisation or standard of care timing of ICA±revascularisation. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants with at least one of the following events (all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction and hospital admission for heart failure) at 12 months. Key secondary outcomes include major bleeding and stroke. A hypothesis generating cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) substudy will provide mechanistic data on infarct size, myocardial salvage and residual ischaemia post percutaneous coronary intervention. On 7 April 2021, the sponsor discontinued enrolment due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and lower than expected event rates. 425 patients were enrolled, and 61 patients underwent CMR. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has been reviewed and approved by the East of England Cambridge East Research Ethics Committee (18/EE/0222). The study results will be submitted for publication within 6 months of completion. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03707314; Pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9066091 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90660912022-05-06 Very early invasive angiography versus standard of care in higher-risk non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: study protocol for the prospective multicentre randomised controlled RAPID N-STEMI trial Kite, Thomas A Banning, Amerjeet S Ladwiniec, Andrew Gale, Chris P Greenwood, John P Dalby, Miles Hobson, Rachel Barber, Shaun Parker, Emma Berry, Colin Flather, Marcus D Curzen, Nick Banning, Adrian P McCann, Gerry P Gershlick, Anthony H BMJ Open Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: There are a paucity of randomised data on the optimal timing of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in higher-risk patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (N-STEMI). International guideline recommendations for early ICA are primarily based on retrospective subgroup analyses of neutral trials. AIMS: The RAPID N-STEMI trial aims to determine whether very early percutaneous revascularisation improves clinical outcomes as compared with a standard of care strategy in higher-risk N-STEMI patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: RAPID N-STEMI is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, randomised-controlled, pragmatic strategy trial. Higher-risk N-STEMI patients, as defined by Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events 2.0 score ≥118, or >90 with at least one additional high-risk feature, were randomised to either: very early ICA±revascularisation or standard of care timing of ICA±revascularisation. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants with at least one of the following events (all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction and hospital admission for heart failure) at 12 months. Key secondary outcomes include major bleeding and stroke. A hypothesis generating cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) substudy will provide mechanistic data on infarct size, myocardial salvage and residual ischaemia post percutaneous coronary intervention. On 7 April 2021, the sponsor discontinued enrolment due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and lower than expected event rates. 425 patients were enrolled, and 61 patients underwent CMR. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has been reviewed and approved by the East of England Cambridge East Research Ethics Committee (18/EE/0222). The study results will be submitted for publication within 6 months of completion. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03707314; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9066091/ /pubmed/35504645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055878 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Kite, Thomas A Banning, Amerjeet S Ladwiniec, Andrew Gale, Chris P Greenwood, John P Dalby, Miles Hobson, Rachel Barber, Shaun Parker, Emma Berry, Colin Flather, Marcus D Curzen, Nick Banning, Adrian P McCann, Gerry P Gershlick, Anthony H Very early invasive angiography versus standard of care in higher-risk non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: study protocol for the prospective multicentre randomised controlled RAPID N-STEMI trial |
title | Very early invasive angiography versus standard of care in higher-risk non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: study protocol for the prospective multicentre randomised controlled RAPID N-STEMI trial |
title_full | Very early invasive angiography versus standard of care in higher-risk non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: study protocol for the prospective multicentre randomised controlled RAPID N-STEMI trial |
title_fullStr | Very early invasive angiography versus standard of care in higher-risk non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: study protocol for the prospective multicentre randomised controlled RAPID N-STEMI trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Very early invasive angiography versus standard of care in higher-risk non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: study protocol for the prospective multicentre randomised controlled RAPID N-STEMI trial |
title_short | Very early invasive angiography versus standard of care in higher-risk non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: study protocol for the prospective multicentre randomised controlled RAPID N-STEMI trial |
title_sort | very early invasive angiography versus standard of care in higher-risk non-st elevation myocardial infarction: study protocol for the prospective multicentre randomised controlled rapid n-stemi trial |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9066091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35504645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055878 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kitethomasa veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial AT banningamerjeets veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial AT ladwiniecandrew veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial AT galechrisp veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial AT greenwoodjohnp veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial AT dalbymiles veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial AT hobsonrachel veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial AT barbershaun veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial AT parkeremma veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial AT berrycolin veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial AT flathermarcusd veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial AT curzennick veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial AT banningadrianp veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial AT mccanngerryp veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial AT gershlickanthonyh veryearlyinvasiveangiographyversusstandardofcareinhigherrisknonstelevationmyocardialinfarctionstudyprotocolfortheprospectivemulticentrerandomisedcontrolledrapidnstemitrial |