Cargando…

Comparison of Propofol and Ketofol on Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN: This was a double-blind randomized study. PURPOSE: The primary purpose was to compare the effects of propofol and ketofol on amplitudes and latencies of transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) during thoracolumbar spine surgery. In addition, intraoperative hemodynamics and muscle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khandelwal, Ankur, Chaturvedi, Arvind, Sokhal, Navdeep, Singh, Akanksha, Sharma, Hanjabam Barun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9066259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34000799
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0562
_version_ 1784699766374924288
author Khandelwal, Ankur
Chaturvedi, Arvind
Sokhal, Navdeep
Singh, Akanksha
Sharma, Hanjabam Barun
author_facet Khandelwal, Ankur
Chaturvedi, Arvind
Sokhal, Navdeep
Singh, Akanksha
Sharma, Hanjabam Barun
author_sort Khandelwal, Ankur
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: This was a double-blind randomized study. PURPOSE: The primary purpose was to compare the effects of propofol and ketofol on amplitudes and latencies of transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) during thoracolumbar spine surgery. In addition, intraoperative hemodynamics and muscle power were compared. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Propofol is commonly used during intraoperative TcMEP monitoring. However, propofol inhibits TcMEP amplitudes and causes hypotension in a dose-dependent fashion. METHODS: Amplitude and latency of TcMEPs were recorded bilaterally from the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and abductor hallucis (AH) muscles in 38 adult American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery. Baseline recordings of TcMEPs in both groups were recorded under propofol infusion. Group X patients then received propofol and fentanyl (1 mcg/kg/hr), and group Y patients received ketofol and fentanyl (1 mcg/kg/hr). Bispectral index was maintained at 40–60 in both groups. Amplitude and latency were recorded at 30 minutes intervals for 2 hours. RESULTS: Propofol caused no significant changes in amplitude and latency in any muscle. In contrast, amplitude increased significantly at all time points in the bilateral APB muscles and 60, 90, and 120 minutes in the left AH muscle without changes in latency in response to ketofol. When the two groups were compared, ketofol induced significantly higher amplitudes at 60, 90, and 120 minutes in the (left) APB, at all time points in the (right) APB, and at 120 minutes in both AH muscles, compared with propofol. Blood pressures were lower and fluid and vasopressor requirements were higher in group X. Muscle power was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ketofol facilitates TcMEP amplitudes without affecting latency. Use of ketofol resulted in a better and more stable hemodynamic profile than did use of propofol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9066259
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90662592022-05-12 Comparison of Propofol and Ketofol on Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery Khandelwal, Ankur Chaturvedi, Arvind Sokhal, Navdeep Singh, Akanksha Sharma, Hanjabam Barun Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: This was a double-blind randomized study. PURPOSE: The primary purpose was to compare the effects of propofol and ketofol on amplitudes and latencies of transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) during thoracolumbar spine surgery. In addition, intraoperative hemodynamics and muscle power were compared. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Propofol is commonly used during intraoperative TcMEP monitoring. However, propofol inhibits TcMEP amplitudes and causes hypotension in a dose-dependent fashion. METHODS: Amplitude and latency of TcMEPs were recorded bilaterally from the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and abductor hallucis (AH) muscles in 38 adult American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery. Baseline recordings of TcMEPs in both groups were recorded under propofol infusion. Group X patients then received propofol and fentanyl (1 mcg/kg/hr), and group Y patients received ketofol and fentanyl (1 mcg/kg/hr). Bispectral index was maintained at 40–60 in both groups. Amplitude and latency were recorded at 30 minutes intervals for 2 hours. RESULTS: Propofol caused no significant changes in amplitude and latency in any muscle. In contrast, amplitude increased significantly at all time points in the bilateral APB muscles and 60, 90, and 120 minutes in the left AH muscle without changes in latency in response to ketofol. When the two groups were compared, ketofol induced significantly higher amplitudes at 60, 90, and 120 minutes in the (left) APB, at all time points in the (right) APB, and at 120 minutes in both AH muscles, compared with propofol. Blood pressures were lower and fluid and vasopressor requirements were higher in group X. Muscle power was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ketofol facilitates TcMEP amplitudes without affecting latency. Use of ketofol resulted in a better and more stable hemodynamic profile than did use of propofol. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2022-04 2021-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9066259/ /pubmed/34000799 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0562 Text en Copyright © 2022 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Khandelwal, Ankur
Chaturvedi, Arvind
Sokhal, Navdeep
Singh, Akanksha
Sharma, Hanjabam Barun
Comparison of Propofol and Ketofol on Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery
title Comparison of Propofol and Ketofol on Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery
title_full Comparison of Propofol and Ketofol on Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery
title_fullStr Comparison of Propofol and Ketofol on Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Propofol and Ketofol on Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery
title_short Comparison of Propofol and Ketofol on Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery
title_sort comparison of propofol and ketofol on transcranial motor evoked potentials in patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9066259/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34000799
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0562
work_keys_str_mv AT khandelwalankur comparisonofpropofolandketofolontranscranialmotorevokedpotentialsinpatientsundergoingthoracolumbarspinesurgery
AT chaturvediarvind comparisonofpropofolandketofolontranscranialmotorevokedpotentialsinpatientsundergoingthoracolumbarspinesurgery
AT sokhalnavdeep comparisonofpropofolandketofolontranscranialmotorevokedpotentialsinpatientsundergoingthoracolumbarspinesurgery
AT singhakanksha comparisonofpropofolandketofolontranscranialmotorevokedpotentialsinpatientsundergoingthoracolumbarspinesurgery
AT sharmahanjabambarun comparisonofpropofolandketofolontranscranialmotorevokedpotentialsinpatientsundergoingthoracolumbarspinesurgery