Cargando…
Comparison of Propofol and Ketofol on Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery
STUDY DESIGN: This was a double-blind randomized study. PURPOSE: The primary purpose was to compare the effects of propofol and ketofol on amplitudes and latencies of transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) during thoracolumbar spine surgery. In addition, intraoperative hemodynamics and muscle...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9066259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34000799 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0562 |
_version_ | 1784699766374924288 |
---|---|
author | Khandelwal, Ankur Chaturvedi, Arvind Sokhal, Navdeep Singh, Akanksha Sharma, Hanjabam Barun |
author_facet | Khandelwal, Ankur Chaturvedi, Arvind Sokhal, Navdeep Singh, Akanksha Sharma, Hanjabam Barun |
author_sort | Khandelwal, Ankur |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: This was a double-blind randomized study. PURPOSE: The primary purpose was to compare the effects of propofol and ketofol on amplitudes and latencies of transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) during thoracolumbar spine surgery. In addition, intraoperative hemodynamics and muscle power were compared. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Propofol is commonly used during intraoperative TcMEP monitoring. However, propofol inhibits TcMEP amplitudes and causes hypotension in a dose-dependent fashion. METHODS: Amplitude and latency of TcMEPs were recorded bilaterally from the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and abductor hallucis (AH) muscles in 38 adult American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery. Baseline recordings of TcMEPs in both groups were recorded under propofol infusion. Group X patients then received propofol and fentanyl (1 mcg/kg/hr), and group Y patients received ketofol and fentanyl (1 mcg/kg/hr). Bispectral index was maintained at 40–60 in both groups. Amplitude and latency were recorded at 30 minutes intervals for 2 hours. RESULTS: Propofol caused no significant changes in amplitude and latency in any muscle. In contrast, amplitude increased significantly at all time points in the bilateral APB muscles and 60, 90, and 120 minutes in the left AH muscle without changes in latency in response to ketofol. When the two groups were compared, ketofol induced significantly higher amplitudes at 60, 90, and 120 minutes in the (left) APB, at all time points in the (right) APB, and at 120 minutes in both AH muscles, compared with propofol. Blood pressures were lower and fluid and vasopressor requirements were higher in group X. Muscle power was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ketofol facilitates TcMEP amplitudes without affecting latency. Use of ketofol resulted in a better and more stable hemodynamic profile than did use of propofol. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9066259 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Korean Society of Spine Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90662592022-05-12 Comparison of Propofol and Ketofol on Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery Khandelwal, Ankur Chaturvedi, Arvind Sokhal, Navdeep Singh, Akanksha Sharma, Hanjabam Barun Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: This was a double-blind randomized study. PURPOSE: The primary purpose was to compare the effects of propofol and ketofol on amplitudes and latencies of transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) during thoracolumbar spine surgery. In addition, intraoperative hemodynamics and muscle power were compared. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Propofol is commonly used during intraoperative TcMEP monitoring. However, propofol inhibits TcMEP amplitudes and causes hypotension in a dose-dependent fashion. METHODS: Amplitude and latency of TcMEPs were recorded bilaterally from the abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and abductor hallucis (AH) muscles in 38 adult American Society of Anesthesiologists I and II patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery. Baseline recordings of TcMEPs in both groups were recorded under propofol infusion. Group X patients then received propofol and fentanyl (1 mcg/kg/hr), and group Y patients received ketofol and fentanyl (1 mcg/kg/hr). Bispectral index was maintained at 40–60 in both groups. Amplitude and latency were recorded at 30 minutes intervals for 2 hours. RESULTS: Propofol caused no significant changes in amplitude and latency in any muscle. In contrast, amplitude increased significantly at all time points in the bilateral APB muscles and 60, 90, and 120 minutes in the left AH muscle without changes in latency in response to ketofol. When the two groups were compared, ketofol induced significantly higher amplitudes at 60, 90, and 120 minutes in the (left) APB, at all time points in the (right) APB, and at 120 minutes in both AH muscles, compared with propofol. Blood pressures were lower and fluid and vasopressor requirements were higher in group X. Muscle power was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ketofol facilitates TcMEP amplitudes without affecting latency. Use of ketofol resulted in a better and more stable hemodynamic profile than did use of propofol. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2022-04 2021-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9066259/ /pubmed/34000799 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0562 Text en Copyright © 2022 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Khandelwal, Ankur Chaturvedi, Arvind Sokhal, Navdeep Singh, Akanksha Sharma, Hanjabam Barun Comparison of Propofol and Ketofol on Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery |
title | Comparison of Propofol and Ketofol on Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery |
title_full | Comparison of Propofol and Ketofol on Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Propofol and Ketofol on Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Propofol and Ketofol on Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery |
title_short | Comparison of Propofol and Ketofol on Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials in Patients Undergoing Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery |
title_sort | comparison of propofol and ketofol on transcranial motor evoked potentials in patients undergoing thoracolumbar spine surgery |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9066259/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34000799 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0562 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khandelwalankur comparisonofpropofolandketofolontranscranialmotorevokedpotentialsinpatientsundergoingthoracolumbarspinesurgery AT chaturvediarvind comparisonofpropofolandketofolontranscranialmotorevokedpotentialsinpatientsundergoingthoracolumbarspinesurgery AT sokhalnavdeep comparisonofpropofolandketofolontranscranialmotorevokedpotentialsinpatientsundergoingthoracolumbarspinesurgery AT singhakanksha comparisonofpropofolandketofolontranscranialmotorevokedpotentialsinpatientsundergoingthoracolumbarspinesurgery AT sharmahanjabambarun comparisonofpropofolandketofolontranscranialmotorevokedpotentialsinpatientsundergoingthoracolumbarspinesurgery |