Cargando…
ASSERT (Acute Sacral inSufficiEncy fractuRe augmenTation): randomised controlled, feasibility trial in older people
OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of designing and conducting a definitive trial to evaluate the effectiveness of sacral fracture fixation compared with non-surgical management among older people admitted with a lateral compression pelvic fragility fracture (PFF). DESIGN: Single-site, parallel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9066477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35504639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050535 |
_version_ | 1784699809197719552 |
---|---|
author | Ong, Terence Suazo Di Paola, Ana Brookes, Cassandra Drummond, Avril Hendrick, Paul Leighton, Paul Jones, Matthew Salem, Khalid Quraishi, Nasir Sahota, Opinder |
author_facet | Ong, Terence Suazo Di Paola, Ana Brookes, Cassandra Drummond, Avril Hendrick, Paul Leighton, Paul Jones, Matthew Salem, Khalid Quraishi, Nasir Sahota, Opinder |
author_sort | Ong, Terence |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of designing and conducting a definitive trial to evaluate the effectiveness of sacral fracture fixation compared with non-surgical management among older people admitted with a lateral compression pelvic fragility fracture (PFF). DESIGN: Single-site, parallel, two-arm randomised controlled feasibility trial. SETTING: A UK tertiary centre hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥70 years who were ambulating pre-injury requiring hospital admission (within 28 days of injury) with a type 1 lateral compression PFF. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention group received sacral fracture fixation (cement augmentation±screw fixation) within 7 days of randomisation. Routine preoperative and postoperative care followed each surgical intervention. The control group received usual care consisting of analgesia, and regular input from the medical and therapy team. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The feasibility outcomes were the number of eligible patients, willingness to be randomised, adherence to allocated treatment, retention, data on the completeness and variability of the proposed definitive trial outcome measures, and reported adverse events. RESULTS: 241 patients were screened. 13 (5.4%) were deemed eligible to participate. Among the eligible participants, nine (69.2%) were willing to participate. Five participants were randomised to the intervention group and four to the control group. The clinicians involved were willing to allow their patients to be randomised and adhere to the allocated treatment. One participant in the intervention group and two participants in the control group received their allocated treatment. All participants were followed up until 12 weeks post-randomisation, and had an additional safety follow-up assessment at 12 months. Overall, the proportion of completeness of outcome measures was at least 75%. No adverse events were directly related to the trial. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant challenges in recruiting sufficient participants which will need to be addressed prior to a definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN16719542. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9066477 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90664772022-05-12 ASSERT (Acute Sacral inSufficiEncy fractuRe augmenTation): randomised controlled, feasibility trial in older people Ong, Terence Suazo Di Paola, Ana Brookes, Cassandra Drummond, Avril Hendrick, Paul Leighton, Paul Jones, Matthew Salem, Khalid Quraishi, Nasir Sahota, Opinder BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of designing and conducting a definitive trial to evaluate the effectiveness of sacral fracture fixation compared with non-surgical management among older people admitted with a lateral compression pelvic fragility fracture (PFF). DESIGN: Single-site, parallel, two-arm randomised controlled feasibility trial. SETTING: A UK tertiary centre hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥70 years who were ambulating pre-injury requiring hospital admission (within 28 days of injury) with a type 1 lateral compression PFF. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention group received sacral fracture fixation (cement augmentation±screw fixation) within 7 days of randomisation. Routine preoperative and postoperative care followed each surgical intervention. The control group received usual care consisting of analgesia, and regular input from the medical and therapy team. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The feasibility outcomes were the number of eligible patients, willingness to be randomised, adherence to allocated treatment, retention, data on the completeness and variability of the proposed definitive trial outcome measures, and reported adverse events. RESULTS: 241 patients were screened. 13 (5.4%) were deemed eligible to participate. Among the eligible participants, nine (69.2%) were willing to participate. Five participants were randomised to the intervention group and four to the control group. The clinicians involved were willing to allow their patients to be randomised and adhere to the allocated treatment. One participant in the intervention group and two participants in the control group received their allocated treatment. All participants were followed up until 12 weeks post-randomisation, and had an additional safety follow-up assessment at 12 months. Overall, the proportion of completeness of outcome measures was at least 75%. No adverse events were directly related to the trial. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant challenges in recruiting sufficient participants which will need to be addressed prior to a definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN16719542. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9066477/ /pubmed/35504639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050535 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Ong, Terence Suazo Di Paola, Ana Brookes, Cassandra Drummond, Avril Hendrick, Paul Leighton, Paul Jones, Matthew Salem, Khalid Quraishi, Nasir Sahota, Opinder ASSERT (Acute Sacral inSufficiEncy fractuRe augmenTation): randomised controlled, feasibility trial in older people |
title | ASSERT (Acute Sacral inSufficiEncy fractuRe augmenTation): randomised controlled, feasibility trial in older people |
title_full | ASSERT (Acute Sacral inSufficiEncy fractuRe augmenTation): randomised controlled, feasibility trial in older people |
title_fullStr | ASSERT (Acute Sacral inSufficiEncy fractuRe augmenTation): randomised controlled, feasibility trial in older people |
title_full_unstemmed | ASSERT (Acute Sacral inSufficiEncy fractuRe augmenTation): randomised controlled, feasibility trial in older people |
title_short | ASSERT (Acute Sacral inSufficiEncy fractuRe augmenTation): randomised controlled, feasibility trial in older people |
title_sort | assert (acute sacral insufficiency fracture augmentation): randomised controlled, feasibility trial in older people |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9066477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35504639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050535 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ongterence assertacutesacralinsufficiencyfractureaugmentationrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialinolderpeople AT suazodipaolaana assertacutesacralinsufficiencyfractureaugmentationrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialinolderpeople AT brookescassandra assertacutesacralinsufficiencyfractureaugmentationrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialinolderpeople AT drummondavril assertacutesacralinsufficiencyfractureaugmentationrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialinolderpeople AT hendrickpaul assertacutesacralinsufficiencyfractureaugmentationrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialinolderpeople AT leightonpaul assertacutesacralinsufficiencyfractureaugmentationrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialinolderpeople AT jonesmatthew assertacutesacralinsufficiencyfractureaugmentationrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialinolderpeople AT salemkhalid assertacutesacralinsufficiencyfractureaugmentationrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialinolderpeople AT quraishinasir assertacutesacralinsufficiencyfractureaugmentationrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialinolderpeople AT sahotaopinder assertacutesacralinsufficiencyfractureaugmentationrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialinolderpeople |