Cargando…

ASSERT (Acute Sacral inSufficiEncy fractuRe augmenTation): randomised controlled, feasibility trial in older people

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of designing and conducting a definitive trial to evaluate the effectiveness of sacral fracture fixation compared with non-surgical management among older people admitted with a lateral compression pelvic fragility fracture (PFF). DESIGN: Single-site, parallel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ong, Terence, Suazo Di Paola, Ana, Brookes, Cassandra, Drummond, Avril, Hendrick, Paul, Leighton, Paul, Jones, Matthew, Salem, Khalid, Quraishi, Nasir, Sahota, Opinder
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9066477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35504639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050535
_version_ 1784699809197719552
author Ong, Terence
Suazo Di Paola, Ana
Brookes, Cassandra
Drummond, Avril
Hendrick, Paul
Leighton, Paul
Jones, Matthew
Salem, Khalid
Quraishi, Nasir
Sahota, Opinder
author_facet Ong, Terence
Suazo Di Paola, Ana
Brookes, Cassandra
Drummond, Avril
Hendrick, Paul
Leighton, Paul
Jones, Matthew
Salem, Khalid
Quraishi, Nasir
Sahota, Opinder
author_sort Ong, Terence
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of designing and conducting a definitive trial to evaluate the effectiveness of sacral fracture fixation compared with non-surgical management among older people admitted with a lateral compression pelvic fragility fracture (PFF). DESIGN: Single-site, parallel, two-arm randomised controlled feasibility trial. SETTING: A UK tertiary centre hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥70 years who were ambulating pre-injury requiring hospital admission (within 28 days of injury) with a type 1 lateral compression PFF. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention group received sacral fracture fixation (cement augmentation±screw fixation) within 7 days of randomisation. Routine preoperative and postoperative care followed each surgical intervention. The control group received usual care consisting of analgesia, and regular input from the medical and therapy team. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The feasibility outcomes were the number of eligible patients, willingness to be randomised, adherence to allocated treatment, retention, data on the completeness and variability of the proposed definitive trial outcome measures, and reported adverse events. RESULTS: 241 patients were screened. 13 (5.4%) were deemed eligible to participate. Among the eligible participants, nine (69.2%) were willing to participate. Five participants were randomised to the intervention group and four to the control group. The clinicians involved were willing to allow their patients to be randomised and adhere to the allocated treatment. One participant in the intervention group and two participants in the control group received their allocated treatment. All participants were followed up until 12 weeks post-randomisation, and had an additional safety follow-up assessment at 12 months. Overall, the proportion of completeness of outcome measures was at least 75%. No adverse events were directly related to the trial. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant challenges in recruiting sufficient participants which will need to be addressed prior to a definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN16719542.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9066477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90664772022-05-12 ASSERT (Acute Sacral inSufficiEncy fractuRe augmenTation): randomised controlled, feasibility trial in older people Ong, Terence Suazo Di Paola, Ana Brookes, Cassandra Drummond, Avril Hendrick, Paul Leighton, Paul Jones, Matthew Salem, Khalid Quraishi, Nasir Sahota, Opinder BMJ Open Surgery OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of designing and conducting a definitive trial to evaluate the effectiveness of sacral fracture fixation compared with non-surgical management among older people admitted with a lateral compression pelvic fragility fracture (PFF). DESIGN: Single-site, parallel, two-arm randomised controlled feasibility trial. SETTING: A UK tertiary centre hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥70 years who were ambulating pre-injury requiring hospital admission (within 28 days of injury) with a type 1 lateral compression PFF. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention group received sacral fracture fixation (cement augmentation±screw fixation) within 7 days of randomisation. Routine preoperative and postoperative care followed each surgical intervention. The control group received usual care consisting of analgesia, and regular input from the medical and therapy team. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The feasibility outcomes were the number of eligible patients, willingness to be randomised, adherence to allocated treatment, retention, data on the completeness and variability of the proposed definitive trial outcome measures, and reported adverse events. RESULTS: 241 patients were screened. 13 (5.4%) were deemed eligible to participate. Among the eligible participants, nine (69.2%) were willing to participate. Five participants were randomised to the intervention group and four to the control group. The clinicians involved were willing to allow their patients to be randomised and adhere to the allocated treatment. One participant in the intervention group and two participants in the control group received their allocated treatment. All participants were followed up until 12 weeks post-randomisation, and had an additional safety follow-up assessment at 12 months. Overall, the proportion of completeness of outcome measures was at least 75%. No adverse events were directly related to the trial. CONCLUSIONS: There were significant challenges in recruiting sufficient participants which will need to be addressed prior to a definitive trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN16719542. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9066477/ /pubmed/35504639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050535 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Surgery
Ong, Terence
Suazo Di Paola, Ana
Brookes, Cassandra
Drummond, Avril
Hendrick, Paul
Leighton, Paul
Jones, Matthew
Salem, Khalid
Quraishi, Nasir
Sahota, Opinder
ASSERT (Acute Sacral inSufficiEncy fractuRe augmenTation): randomised controlled, feasibility trial in older people
title ASSERT (Acute Sacral inSufficiEncy fractuRe augmenTation): randomised controlled, feasibility trial in older people
title_full ASSERT (Acute Sacral inSufficiEncy fractuRe augmenTation): randomised controlled, feasibility trial in older people
title_fullStr ASSERT (Acute Sacral inSufficiEncy fractuRe augmenTation): randomised controlled, feasibility trial in older people
title_full_unstemmed ASSERT (Acute Sacral inSufficiEncy fractuRe augmenTation): randomised controlled, feasibility trial in older people
title_short ASSERT (Acute Sacral inSufficiEncy fractuRe augmenTation): randomised controlled, feasibility trial in older people
title_sort assert (acute sacral insufficiency fracture augmentation): randomised controlled, feasibility trial in older people
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9066477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35504639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050535
work_keys_str_mv AT ongterence assertacutesacralinsufficiencyfractureaugmentationrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialinolderpeople
AT suazodipaolaana assertacutesacralinsufficiencyfractureaugmentationrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialinolderpeople
AT brookescassandra assertacutesacralinsufficiencyfractureaugmentationrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialinolderpeople
AT drummondavril assertacutesacralinsufficiencyfractureaugmentationrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialinolderpeople
AT hendrickpaul assertacutesacralinsufficiencyfractureaugmentationrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialinolderpeople
AT leightonpaul assertacutesacralinsufficiencyfractureaugmentationrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialinolderpeople
AT jonesmatthew assertacutesacralinsufficiencyfractureaugmentationrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialinolderpeople
AT salemkhalid assertacutesacralinsufficiencyfractureaugmentationrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialinolderpeople
AT quraishinasir assertacutesacralinsufficiencyfractureaugmentationrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialinolderpeople
AT sahotaopinder assertacutesacralinsufficiencyfractureaugmentationrandomisedcontrolledfeasibilitytrialinolderpeople