Cargando…
A systematic review and standardized clinical validity assessment of genes involved in female reproductive failure
Genetic testing is becoming increasingly required at almost every stage of failed female reproduction/infertility. Nonetheless, clinical evidence for the majority of identified gene–disease relationships is ill-defined, thus leading to difficult gene variant interpretation and poor translation of ex...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bioscientifica Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9066658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/REP-21-0486 |
_version_ | 1784699841174044672 |
---|---|
author | Volozonoka, Ludmila Miskova, Anna Kornejeva, Liene Kempa, Inga Bargatina, Veronika Gailite, Linda |
author_facet | Volozonoka, Ludmila Miskova, Anna Kornejeva, Liene Kempa, Inga Bargatina, Veronika Gailite, Linda |
author_sort | Volozonoka, Ludmila |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genetic testing is becoming increasingly required at almost every stage of failed female reproduction/infertility. Nonetheless, clinical evidence for the majority of identified gene–disease relationships is ill-defined, thus leading to difficult gene variant interpretation and poor translation of existing knowledge into clinics. We aimed to identify the genes that have ever been implicated in monogenic female reproductive failure in humans and to classify the identified gene–disease relationship pairs using a standardized clinical validity assessment. A PubMed search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted on 20 September 2021 aiming to identify studies pertaining to genetic causes of phenotypes of female reproductive failure. The clinical validity of identified gene–disease pairs was assessed using standardized criteria, counting whether sufficient genetic and experimental evidence has been accumulated to consider a single gene ‘characterized’ for a single Mendelian disease. In total, 1256 articles were selected for the data extraction; 183 unique gene–disease pairs were classified spanning the following phenotypes: hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, ovarian dysgenesis, premature ovarian failure/insufficiency, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, empty follicle syndrome, oocyte maturation defect, fertilization failure, early embryonic arrest, recurrent hydatidiform mole, adrenal disfunction and Mullerian aplasia. Twenty-four gene–disease pairs showed definitive evidence, 36 – strong, 19 – moderate, 81 – limited and 23 – showed no evidence. Here, we provide comprehensive, systematic and timely information on the genetic causes of female infertility. Our classification of genetic causes of female reproductive failure will facilitate the composition of up-to-date guidelines on genetic testing in female reproduction, the development of diagnostic gene panels and the advancement of reproductive decision-making. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9066658 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Bioscientifica Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90666582022-05-04 A systematic review and standardized clinical validity assessment of genes involved in female reproductive failure Volozonoka, Ludmila Miskova, Anna Kornejeva, Liene Kempa, Inga Bargatina, Veronika Gailite, Linda Reproduction Research Genetic testing is becoming increasingly required at almost every stage of failed female reproduction/infertility. Nonetheless, clinical evidence for the majority of identified gene–disease relationships is ill-defined, thus leading to difficult gene variant interpretation and poor translation of existing knowledge into clinics. We aimed to identify the genes that have ever been implicated in monogenic female reproductive failure in humans and to classify the identified gene–disease relationship pairs using a standardized clinical validity assessment. A PubMed search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted on 20 September 2021 aiming to identify studies pertaining to genetic causes of phenotypes of female reproductive failure. The clinical validity of identified gene–disease pairs was assessed using standardized criteria, counting whether sufficient genetic and experimental evidence has been accumulated to consider a single gene ‘characterized’ for a single Mendelian disease. In total, 1256 articles were selected for the data extraction; 183 unique gene–disease pairs were classified spanning the following phenotypes: hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, ovarian dysgenesis, premature ovarian failure/insufficiency, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, empty follicle syndrome, oocyte maturation defect, fertilization failure, early embryonic arrest, recurrent hydatidiform mole, adrenal disfunction and Mullerian aplasia. Twenty-four gene–disease pairs showed definitive evidence, 36 – strong, 19 – moderate, 81 – limited and 23 – showed no evidence. Here, we provide comprehensive, systematic and timely information on the genetic causes of female infertility. Our classification of genetic causes of female reproductive failure will facilitate the composition of up-to-date guidelines on genetic testing in female reproduction, the development of diagnostic gene panels and the advancement of reproductive decision-making. Bioscientifica Ltd 2022-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9066658/ /pubmed/35451369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/REP-21-0486 Text en © The authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Volozonoka, Ludmila Miskova, Anna Kornejeva, Liene Kempa, Inga Bargatina, Veronika Gailite, Linda A systematic review and standardized clinical validity assessment of genes involved in female reproductive failure |
title | A systematic review and standardized clinical validity assessment of genes involved in female reproductive failure |
title_full | A systematic review and standardized clinical validity assessment of genes involved in female reproductive failure |
title_fullStr | A systematic review and standardized clinical validity assessment of genes involved in female reproductive failure |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review and standardized clinical validity assessment of genes involved in female reproductive failure |
title_short | A systematic review and standardized clinical validity assessment of genes involved in female reproductive failure |
title_sort | systematic review and standardized clinical validity assessment of genes involved in female reproductive failure |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9066658/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35451369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/REP-21-0486 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT volozonokaludmila asystematicreviewandstandardizedclinicalvalidityassessmentofgenesinvolvedinfemalereproductivefailure AT miskovaanna asystematicreviewandstandardizedclinicalvalidityassessmentofgenesinvolvedinfemalereproductivefailure AT kornejevaliene asystematicreviewandstandardizedclinicalvalidityassessmentofgenesinvolvedinfemalereproductivefailure AT kempainga asystematicreviewandstandardizedclinicalvalidityassessmentofgenesinvolvedinfemalereproductivefailure AT bargatinaveronika asystematicreviewandstandardizedclinicalvalidityassessmentofgenesinvolvedinfemalereproductivefailure AT gailitelinda asystematicreviewandstandardizedclinicalvalidityassessmentofgenesinvolvedinfemalereproductivefailure AT volozonokaludmila systematicreviewandstandardizedclinicalvalidityassessmentofgenesinvolvedinfemalereproductivefailure AT miskovaanna systematicreviewandstandardizedclinicalvalidityassessmentofgenesinvolvedinfemalereproductivefailure AT kornejevaliene systematicreviewandstandardizedclinicalvalidityassessmentofgenesinvolvedinfemalereproductivefailure AT kempainga systematicreviewandstandardizedclinicalvalidityassessmentofgenesinvolvedinfemalereproductivefailure AT bargatinaveronika systematicreviewandstandardizedclinicalvalidityassessmentofgenesinvolvedinfemalereproductivefailure AT gailitelinda systematicreviewandstandardizedclinicalvalidityassessmentofgenesinvolvedinfemalereproductivefailure |