Cargando…

United for health to improve urban food environments across five underserved communities: a cross-sector coalition approach

BACKGROUND: Cross-sector coalitions can be a powerful vehicle to promote adoption and implementation of evidence-based programs and policies across diverse racial/ethnic communities with a high chronic disease burden. Few studies have examined coalition composition, function, or capacity to promote...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Payán, Denise D., Lewis, LaVonna B., Illum, Jacqueline, Hawkins, Breanna, Sloane, David C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9066811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13245-2
_version_ 1784699873591820288
author Payán, Denise D.
Lewis, LaVonna B.
Illum, Jacqueline
Hawkins, Breanna
Sloane, David C.
author_facet Payán, Denise D.
Lewis, LaVonna B.
Illum, Jacqueline
Hawkins, Breanna
Sloane, David C.
author_sort Payán, Denise D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cross-sector coalitions can be a powerful vehicle to promote adoption and implementation of evidence-based programs and policies across diverse racial/ethnic communities with a high chronic disease burden. Few studies have examined coalition composition, function, or capacity to promote learning among members. METHODS: We used a mixed methods approach to examine the United for Health coalition’s implementation of multiple food environment interventions across five low-income communities of color in Los Angeles, California (USA). At the coalition-level, key measures included the collaborative environment, membership characteristics, process and structure, communication, resources, strengths, challenges/barriers, and community impact. At the organizational- and individual-levels, we collected data on participation, leadership development, intraorganizational change, perceived benefits, and learning outcomes. FINDINGS: Overall, the United for Health coalition produced five community gardens, three pop-up produce markets, and one farmers’ market; members also expanded Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) access at three existing farmers’ markets. Findings indicate early coalition strengths included having a mutual purpose, which was maintained throughout the study period. Coalition participation and engagement was consistently high, while coalition and inter-organizational communication improved over time. Strengths were membership diversity and the availability of learning opportunities. Benefits included leadership development and strategic alignment across organizations. Members demonstrated an increased awareness of the importance of culturally adapted interventions and knowledge of community health planning topics. Key implementation challenges were a lack of resources and social context barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Examining coalition function and maturation in a real-world context reveals important lessons for scholars and practitioners committed to addressing nutrition-related health disparities in marginalized and historically underserved communities. Future work should investigate the sustainability of externally funded cross-sector coalitions after funding ceases. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13245-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9066811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90668112022-05-04 United for health to improve urban food environments across five underserved communities: a cross-sector coalition approach Payán, Denise D. Lewis, LaVonna B. Illum, Jacqueline Hawkins, Breanna Sloane, David C. BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Cross-sector coalitions can be a powerful vehicle to promote adoption and implementation of evidence-based programs and policies across diverse racial/ethnic communities with a high chronic disease burden. Few studies have examined coalition composition, function, or capacity to promote learning among members. METHODS: We used a mixed methods approach to examine the United for Health coalition’s implementation of multiple food environment interventions across five low-income communities of color in Los Angeles, California (USA). At the coalition-level, key measures included the collaborative environment, membership characteristics, process and structure, communication, resources, strengths, challenges/barriers, and community impact. At the organizational- and individual-levels, we collected data on participation, leadership development, intraorganizational change, perceived benefits, and learning outcomes. FINDINGS: Overall, the United for Health coalition produced five community gardens, three pop-up produce markets, and one farmers’ market; members also expanded Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) access at three existing farmers’ markets. Findings indicate early coalition strengths included having a mutual purpose, which was maintained throughout the study period. Coalition participation and engagement was consistently high, while coalition and inter-organizational communication improved over time. Strengths were membership diversity and the availability of learning opportunities. Benefits included leadership development and strategic alignment across organizations. Members demonstrated an increased awareness of the importance of culturally adapted interventions and knowledge of community health planning topics. Key implementation challenges were a lack of resources and social context barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Examining coalition function and maturation in a real-world context reveals important lessons for scholars and practitioners committed to addressing nutrition-related health disparities in marginalized and historically underserved communities. Future work should investigate the sustainability of externally funded cross-sector coalitions after funding ceases. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13245-2. BioMed Central 2022-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9066811/ /pubmed/35509034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13245-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Payán, Denise D.
Lewis, LaVonna B.
Illum, Jacqueline
Hawkins, Breanna
Sloane, David C.
United for health to improve urban food environments across five underserved communities: a cross-sector coalition approach
title United for health to improve urban food environments across five underserved communities: a cross-sector coalition approach
title_full United for health to improve urban food environments across five underserved communities: a cross-sector coalition approach
title_fullStr United for health to improve urban food environments across five underserved communities: a cross-sector coalition approach
title_full_unstemmed United for health to improve urban food environments across five underserved communities: a cross-sector coalition approach
title_short United for health to improve urban food environments across five underserved communities: a cross-sector coalition approach
title_sort united for health to improve urban food environments across five underserved communities: a cross-sector coalition approach
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9066811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13245-2
work_keys_str_mv AT payandenised unitedforhealthtoimproveurbanfoodenvironmentsacrossfiveunderservedcommunitiesacrosssectorcoalitionapproach
AT lewislavonnab unitedforhealthtoimproveurbanfoodenvironmentsacrossfiveunderservedcommunitiesacrosssectorcoalitionapproach
AT illumjacqueline unitedforhealthtoimproveurbanfoodenvironmentsacrossfiveunderservedcommunitiesacrosssectorcoalitionapproach
AT hawkinsbreanna unitedforhealthtoimproveurbanfoodenvironmentsacrossfiveunderservedcommunitiesacrosssectorcoalitionapproach
AT sloanedavidc unitedforhealthtoimproveurbanfoodenvironmentsacrossfiveunderservedcommunitiesacrosssectorcoalitionapproach