Cargando…
WHO criteria for diabetes in pregnancy: a retrospective cohort
BACKGROUND: Recognizing that hyperglycemia in pregnancy can impact both individually a patient’s health and collectively the healthcare system and that different levels of hyperglycemia incur different consequences, we aimed to evaluate the differences and similarities between patients who met the d...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9066879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35505301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04708-w |
_version_ | 1784699888440705024 |
---|---|
author | Zaccara, Tatiana A. Paganoti, Cristiane F. Mikami, Fernanda C. F. Francisco, Rossana P. V. Costa, Rafaela A. |
author_facet | Zaccara, Tatiana A. Paganoti, Cristiane F. Mikami, Fernanda C. F. Francisco, Rossana P. V. Costa, Rafaela A. |
author_sort | Zaccara, Tatiana A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recognizing that hyperglycemia in pregnancy can impact both individually a patient’s health and collectively the healthcare system and that different levels of hyperglycemia incur different consequences, we aimed to evaluate the differences and similarities between patients who met the diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or diabetes in pregnancy (DIP) according to the World Health Organization diagnostic criteria based on the 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). METHODS: This retrospective study included a cohort of 1064 women followed-up at the Gestational Diabetes Unit of Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo (Sao Paulo, Brazil). Patients were classified into GDM and DIP groups, according to their OGTT results. Their electronic charts were reviewed to obtain clinical and laboratory data for all participants. RESULTS: Women in the DIP group had a higher pre-pregnancy body mass index (30.5 vs 28.1 kg/m(2), odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–1.11), more frequently experienced GDM in a previous pregnancy (25% vs. 11%, OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.17–6.27), and were more likely to have chronic hypertension (43.1% vs. 23.5%, OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.47–4.11), a current twin pregnancy (10.8% vs. 2.9%, OR 4.04, 95% CI 1.70–9.61), or require insulin (46.1% vs. 14.3%, OR 5.14, 95% CI 3.06–8.65) than those in the GDM group. Patients in the DIP group also had a higher frequency of large-for-gestational-age infants (12.3% vs. 5.1%, OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.23–6.27) and abnormal postpartum OGTT (45.9% vs. 12.6%, OR 5.91, 95% CI 2.93–11.90) than those in the GDM group. Nevertheless, in more than half of the DIP patients, glucose levels returned to normal after birth. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes in pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes but does not equate to a diagnosis of diabetes post-pregnancy. It is necessary to identify and monitor these women more closely during and after pregnancy. Keeping patients with hyperglycemia in pregnancy engaged in healthcare is essential for accurate diagnosis and prevention of complications related to abnormal glucose metabolism. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9066879 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90668792022-05-04 WHO criteria for diabetes in pregnancy: a retrospective cohort Zaccara, Tatiana A. Paganoti, Cristiane F. Mikami, Fernanda C. F. Francisco, Rossana P. V. Costa, Rafaela A. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: Recognizing that hyperglycemia in pregnancy can impact both individually a patient’s health and collectively the healthcare system and that different levels of hyperglycemia incur different consequences, we aimed to evaluate the differences and similarities between patients who met the diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) or diabetes in pregnancy (DIP) according to the World Health Organization diagnostic criteria based on the 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). METHODS: This retrospective study included a cohort of 1064 women followed-up at the Gestational Diabetes Unit of Hospital das Clinicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Sao Paulo (Sao Paulo, Brazil). Patients were classified into GDM and DIP groups, according to their OGTT results. Their electronic charts were reviewed to obtain clinical and laboratory data for all participants. RESULTS: Women in the DIP group had a higher pre-pregnancy body mass index (30.5 vs 28.1 kg/m(2), odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–1.11), more frequently experienced GDM in a previous pregnancy (25% vs. 11%, OR 2.71, 95% CI 1.17–6.27), and were more likely to have chronic hypertension (43.1% vs. 23.5%, OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.47–4.11), a current twin pregnancy (10.8% vs. 2.9%, OR 4.04, 95% CI 1.70–9.61), or require insulin (46.1% vs. 14.3%, OR 5.14, 95% CI 3.06–8.65) than those in the GDM group. Patients in the DIP group also had a higher frequency of large-for-gestational-age infants (12.3% vs. 5.1%, OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.23–6.27) and abnormal postpartum OGTT (45.9% vs. 12.6%, OR 5.91, 95% CI 2.93–11.90) than those in the GDM group. Nevertheless, in more than half of the DIP patients, glucose levels returned to normal after birth. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes in pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes but does not equate to a diagnosis of diabetes post-pregnancy. It is necessary to identify and monitor these women more closely during and after pregnancy. Keeping patients with hyperglycemia in pregnancy engaged in healthcare is essential for accurate diagnosis and prevention of complications related to abnormal glucose metabolism. BioMed Central 2022-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9066879/ /pubmed/35505301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04708-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Zaccara, Tatiana A. Paganoti, Cristiane F. Mikami, Fernanda C. F. Francisco, Rossana P. V. Costa, Rafaela A. WHO criteria for diabetes in pregnancy: a retrospective cohort |
title | WHO criteria for diabetes in pregnancy: a retrospective cohort |
title_full | WHO criteria for diabetes in pregnancy: a retrospective cohort |
title_fullStr | WHO criteria for diabetes in pregnancy: a retrospective cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | WHO criteria for diabetes in pregnancy: a retrospective cohort |
title_short | WHO criteria for diabetes in pregnancy: a retrospective cohort |
title_sort | who criteria for diabetes in pregnancy: a retrospective cohort |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9066879/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35505301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04708-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zaccaratatianaa whocriteriafordiabetesinpregnancyaretrospectivecohort AT paganoticristianef whocriteriafordiabetesinpregnancyaretrospectivecohort AT mikamifernandacf whocriteriafordiabetesinpregnancyaretrospectivecohort AT franciscorossanapv whocriteriafordiabetesinpregnancyaretrospectivecohort AT costarafaelaa whocriteriafordiabetesinpregnancyaretrospectivecohort |