Cargando…

Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study

BACKGROUND: The quantium consciousness index (qCON), an electroencephalography (EEG)-based modality, has no studies regarding intensive care unit (ICU) sedation, though very few studies describe its use for assessing depth of anesthesia in the operation theater. In this study, we evaluated qCON for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harsha, Makam S, Bhatia, Pradeep K, Sharma, Ankur, Sethi, Priyanka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9067479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35656063
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24183
_version_ 1784700013711982592
author Harsha, Makam S
Bhatia, Pradeep K
Sharma, Ankur
Sethi, Priyanka
author_facet Harsha, Makam S
Bhatia, Pradeep K
Sharma, Ankur
Sethi, Priyanka
author_sort Harsha, Makam S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The quantium consciousness index (qCON), an electroencephalography (EEG)-based modality, has no studies regarding intensive care unit (ICU) sedation, though very few studies describe its use for assessing depth of anesthesia in the operation theater. In this study, we evaluated qCON for assessing sedation compared with Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) in patients on a mechanical ventilator in the ICU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-seven mechanically ventilated patients aged between 18 and 60 years were investigated over a 12-hour period. They were given a standardized dosage of sedation comprised of a bolus dose of propofol 0.5 mg/kg and fentanyl 1 µg/kg, and then infusions of propofol 2–5 mg/kg/hour and fentanyl 0.5–2 µg/kg/hour. These drug infusions were adjusted to achieve a RASS score between 0 and −3. Using the qCON monitor, the investigator recorded the qCON values and then assessed the RASS score. RESULTS: A total of 1,218 readings were obtained. After contrasting each qCON value correspondingly with time to each RASS value, we found their correlation to be statistically significant (ρ = 0.288, p <0.0001). With the help of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, we were able to differentiate appropriate from inappropriate levels of sedation. A qCON value of 80 had a sensitivity of 72.67% and a specificity of 67.42% (AUC 0.738 with SE 0.021). CONCLUSION: qCON can be used for assessing sedation levels in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2019/07/020064. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Harsha MS, Bhatia PK, Sharma A, Sethi P. Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(4):491–495.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9067479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90674792022-06-01 Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study Harsha, Makam S Bhatia, Pradeep K Sharma, Ankur Sethi, Priyanka Indian J Crit Care Med Original Article BACKGROUND: The quantium consciousness index (qCON), an electroencephalography (EEG)-based modality, has no studies regarding intensive care unit (ICU) sedation, though very few studies describe its use for assessing depth of anesthesia in the operation theater. In this study, we evaluated qCON for assessing sedation compared with Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) in patients on a mechanical ventilator in the ICU. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-seven mechanically ventilated patients aged between 18 and 60 years were investigated over a 12-hour period. They were given a standardized dosage of sedation comprised of a bolus dose of propofol 0.5 mg/kg and fentanyl 1 µg/kg, and then infusions of propofol 2–5 mg/kg/hour and fentanyl 0.5–2 µg/kg/hour. These drug infusions were adjusted to achieve a RASS score between 0 and −3. Using the qCON monitor, the investigator recorded the qCON values and then assessed the RASS score. RESULTS: A total of 1,218 readings were obtained. After contrasting each qCON value correspondingly with time to each RASS value, we found their correlation to be statistically significant (ρ = 0.288, p <0.0001). With the help of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, we were able to differentiate appropriate from inappropriate levels of sedation. A qCON value of 80 had a sensitivity of 72.67% and a specificity of 67.42% (AUC 0.738 with SE 0.021). CONCLUSION: qCON can be used for assessing sedation levels in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2019/07/020064. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Harsha MS, Bhatia PK, Sharma A, Sethi P. Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(4):491–495. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9067479/ /pubmed/35656063 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24183 Text en Copyright © 2022; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/© The Author(s). 2022 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Original Article
Harsha, Makam S
Bhatia, Pradeep K
Sharma, Ankur
Sethi, Priyanka
Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study
title Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study
title_full Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study
title_short Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study
title_sort comparison of quantium consciousness index and richmond agitation sedation scale in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: an observational study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9067479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35656063
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24183
work_keys_str_mv AT harshamakams comparisonofquantiumconsciousnessindexandrichmondagitationsedationscaleinmechanicallyventilatedcriticallyillpatientsanobservationalstudy
AT bhatiapradeepk comparisonofquantiumconsciousnessindexandrichmondagitationsedationscaleinmechanicallyventilatedcriticallyillpatientsanobservationalstudy
AT sharmaankur comparisonofquantiumconsciousnessindexandrichmondagitationsedationscaleinmechanicallyventilatedcriticallyillpatientsanobservationalstudy
AT sethipriyanka comparisonofquantiumconsciousnessindexandrichmondagitationsedationscaleinmechanicallyventilatedcriticallyillpatientsanobservationalstudy