Cargando…

Genome-wide CpG density and DNA methylation analysis method (MeDIP, RRBS, and WGBS) comparisons

Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis is one of the most common epigenetic processes analysed for genome characterization and differential DNA methylation assessment. Previous genome-wide analysis has suggested an important variable in DNA methylation methods involves CpG density. The current study w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beck, Daniel, Ben Maamar, Millissia, Skinner, Michael K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9067529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33975521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2021.1924970
_version_ 1784700025005146112
author Beck, Daniel
Ben Maamar, Millissia
Skinner, Michael K.
author_facet Beck, Daniel
Ben Maamar, Millissia
Skinner, Michael K.
author_sort Beck, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis is one of the most common epigenetic processes analysed for genome characterization and differential DNA methylation assessment. Previous genome-wide analysis has suggested an important variable in DNA methylation methods involves CpG density. The current study was designed to investigate the CpG density in a variety of different species genomes and correlate this to various DNA methylation analysis data sets. The majority of all genomes had >90% of the genome in the low density 1–3 CpG/100 bp category, while <10% of the genome was in the higher density >5 CpG/100 bp category. Similar observations with human, rat, bird, and fish genomes were observed. The methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) procedure uses the anti-5-methylcytosine antibody immunoprecipitation followed by next-generation sequencing (MeDIP-Seq). The MeDIP procedure is biased to lower CpG density of <5 CpG/100 bp, which corresponds to >95% of the genome. The reduced representation bisulphite (RRBS) protocol generally identifies DMRs in higher CpG density regions of ≥3 CpG/100 bp which corresponds to approximately 20% of the genome. The whole-genome bisulphite (WGBS) analyses resulted in higher CpG densities, often greater than 10 CpG/100bp. WGBS generally identifies ≥2 CpG/100bp, which corresponds to approximately 50% of the genome. Limitations and potential optimization approaches for each method are discussed. None of the procedures can provide complete genome-wide assessment of the genome, but MeDIP-Seq provides coverage of the highest percentage. Observations demonstrate that CpG density is a critical variable in DNA methylation analysis, and different molecular techniques focus on distinct genomic regions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9067529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90675292022-05-05 Genome-wide CpG density and DNA methylation analysis method (MeDIP, RRBS, and WGBS) comparisons Beck, Daniel Ben Maamar, Millissia Skinner, Michael K. Epigenetics Research Paper Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis is one of the most common epigenetic processes analysed for genome characterization and differential DNA methylation assessment. Previous genome-wide analysis has suggested an important variable in DNA methylation methods involves CpG density. The current study was designed to investigate the CpG density in a variety of different species genomes and correlate this to various DNA methylation analysis data sets. The majority of all genomes had >90% of the genome in the low density 1–3 CpG/100 bp category, while <10% of the genome was in the higher density >5 CpG/100 bp category. Similar observations with human, rat, bird, and fish genomes were observed. The methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) procedure uses the anti-5-methylcytosine antibody immunoprecipitation followed by next-generation sequencing (MeDIP-Seq). The MeDIP procedure is biased to lower CpG density of <5 CpG/100 bp, which corresponds to >95% of the genome. The reduced representation bisulphite (RRBS) protocol generally identifies DMRs in higher CpG density regions of ≥3 CpG/100 bp which corresponds to approximately 20% of the genome. The whole-genome bisulphite (WGBS) analyses resulted in higher CpG densities, often greater than 10 CpG/100bp. WGBS generally identifies ≥2 CpG/100bp, which corresponds to approximately 50% of the genome. Limitations and potential optimization approaches for each method are discussed. None of the procedures can provide complete genome-wide assessment of the genome, but MeDIP-Seq provides coverage of the highest percentage. Observations demonstrate that CpG density is a critical variable in DNA methylation analysis, and different molecular techniques focus on distinct genomic regions. Taylor & Francis 2021-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9067529/ /pubmed/33975521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2021.1924970 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Beck, Daniel
Ben Maamar, Millissia
Skinner, Michael K.
Genome-wide CpG density and DNA methylation analysis method (MeDIP, RRBS, and WGBS) comparisons
title Genome-wide CpG density and DNA methylation analysis method (MeDIP, RRBS, and WGBS) comparisons
title_full Genome-wide CpG density and DNA methylation analysis method (MeDIP, RRBS, and WGBS) comparisons
title_fullStr Genome-wide CpG density and DNA methylation analysis method (MeDIP, RRBS, and WGBS) comparisons
title_full_unstemmed Genome-wide CpG density and DNA methylation analysis method (MeDIP, RRBS, and WGBS) comparisons
title_short Genome-wide CpG density and DNA methylation analysis method (MeDIP, RRBS, and WGBS) comparisons
title_sort genome-wide cpg density and dna methylation analysis method (medip, rrbs, and wgbs) comparisons
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9067529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33975521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2021.1924970
work_keys_str_mv AT beckdaniel genomewidecpgdensityanddnamethylationanalysismethodmediprrbsandwgbscomparisons
AT benmaamarmillissia genomewidecpgdensityanddnamethylationanalysismethodmediprrbsandwgbscomparisons
AT skinnermichaelk genomewidecpgdensityanddnamethylationanalysismethodmediprrbsandwgbscomparisons