Cargando…
Genome-wide CpG density and DNA methylation analysis method (MeDIP, RRBS, and WGBS) comparisons
Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis is one of the most common epigenetic processes analysed for genome characterization and differential DNA methylation assessment. Previous genome-wide analysis has suggested an important variable in DNA methylation methods involves CpG density. The current study w...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9067529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33975521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2021.1924970 |
_version_ | 1784700025005146112 |
---|---|
author | Beck, Daniel Ben Maamar, Millissia Skinner, Michael K. |
author_facet | Beck, Daniel Ben Maamar, Millissia Skinner, Michael K. |
author_sort | Beck, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis is one of the most common epigenetic processes analysed for genome characterization and differential DNA methylation assessment. Previous genome-wide analysis has suggested an important variable in DNA methylation methods involves CpG density. The current study was designed to investigate the CpG density in a variety of different species genomes and correlate this to various DNA methylation analysis data sets. The majority of all genomes had >90% of the genome in the low density 1–3 CpG/100 bp category, while <10% of the genome was in the higher density >5 CpG/100 bp category. Similar observations with human, rat, bird, and fish genomes were observed. The methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) procedure uses the anti-5-methylcytosine antibody immunoprecipitation followed by next-generation sequencing (MeDIP-Seq). The MeDIP procedure is biased to lower CpG density of <5 CpG/100 bp, which corresponds to >95% of the genome. The reduced representation bisulphite (RRBS) protocol generally identifies DMRs in higher CpG density regions of ≥3 CpG/100 bp which corresponds to approximately 20% of the genome. The whole-genome bisulphite (WGBS) analyses resulted in higher CpG densities, often greater than 10 CpG/100bp. WGBS generally identifies ≥2 CpG/100bp, which corresponds to approximately 50% of the genome. Limitations and potential optimization approaches for each method are discussed. None of the procedures can provide complete genome-wide assessment of the genome, but MeDIP-Seq provides coverage of the highest percentage. Observations demonstrate that CpG density is a critical variable in DNA methylation analysis, and different molecular techniques focus on distinct genomic regions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9067529 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90675292022-05-05 Genome-wide CpG density and DNA methylation analysis method (MeDIP, RRBS, and WGBS) comparisons Beck, Daniel Ben Maamar, Millissia Skinner, Michael K. Epigenetics Research Paper Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis is one of the most common epigenetic processes analysed for genome characterization and differential DNA methylation assessment. Previous genome-wide analysis has suggested an important variable in DNA methylation methods involves CpG density. The current study was designed to investigate the CpG density in a variety of different species genomes and correlate this to various DNA methylation analysis data sets. The majority of all genomes had >90% of the genome in the low density 1–3 CpG/100 bp category, while <10% of the genome was in the higher density >5 CpG/100 bp category. Similar observations with human, rat, bird, and fish genomes were observed. The methylated DNA immunoprecipitation (MeDIP) procedure uses the anti-5-methylcytosine antibody immunoprecipitation followed by next-generation sequencing (MeDIP-Seq). The MeDIP procedure is biased to lower CpG density of <5 CpG/100 bp, which corresponds to >95% of the genome. The reduced representation bisulphite (RRBS) protocol generally identifies DMRs in higher CpG density regions of ≥3 CpG/100 bp which corresponds to approximately 20% of the genome. The whole-genome bisulphite (WGBS) analyses resulted in higher CpG densities, often greater than 10 CpG/100bp. WGBS generally identifies ≥2 CpG/100bp, which corresponds to approximately 50% of the genome. Limitations and potential optimization approaches for each method are discussed. None of the procedures can provide complete genome-wide assessment of the genome, but MeDIP-Seq provides coverage of the highest percentage. Observations demonstrate that CpG density is a critical variable in DNA methylation analysis, and different molecular techniques focus on distinct genomic regions. Taylor & Francis 2021-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9067529/ /pubmed/33975521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2021.1924970 Text en © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Beck, Daniel Ben Maamar, Millissia Skinner, Michael K. Genome-wide CpG density and DNA methylation analysis method (MeDIP, RRBS, and WGBS) comparisons |
title | Genome-wide CpG density and DNA methylation analysis method (MeDIP, RRBS, and WGBS) comparisons |
title_full | Genome-wide CpG density and DNA methylation analysis method (MeDIP, RRBS, and WGBS) comparisons |
title_fullStr | Genome-wide CpG density and DNA methylation analysis method (MeDIP, RRBS, and WGBS) comparisons |
title_full_unstemmed | Genome-wide CpG density and DNA methylation analysis method (MeDIP, RRBS, and WGBS) comparisons |
title_short | Genome-wide CpG density and DNA methylation analysis method (MeDIP, RRBS, and WGBS) comparisons |
title_sort | genome-wide cpg density and dna methylation analysis method (medip, rrbs, and wgbs) comparisons |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9067529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33975521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15592294.2021.1924970 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beckdaniel genomewidecpgdensityanddnamethylationanalysismethodmediprrbsandwgbscomparisons AT benmaamarmillissia genomewidecpgdensityanddnamethylationanalysismethodmediprrbsandwgbscomparisons AT skinnermichaelk genomewidecpgdensityanddnamethylationanalysismethodmediprrbsandwgbscomparisons |