Cargando…

Abstract 147: The diagnostic accuracy of portable, non-contact, handheld retinal camera in screening diabetic retinopathy

Background: Hand-held retinal camera (HRC) is a portable device which require less expertise and training with less image acquisition time in identifying diabetic retinopathy (DR). Aims and Objectives: To find out the diagnostic accuracy of HRC in identifying DR in comparison to the table top fundus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ajeesh, T, Jabbar, P K, Das, Darvin V, Indira, V, Jayakumari, C, Gomez, Ramesh, Nair, Abilash, Soumya, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9067814/
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.342272
_version_ 1784700090863058944
author Ajeesh, T
Jabbar, P K
Das, Darvin V
Indira, V
Jayakumari, C
Gomez, Ramesh
Nair, Abilash
Soumya, S
author_facet Ajeesh, T
Jabbar, P K
Das, Darvin V
Indira, V
Jayakumari, C
Gomez, Ramesh
Nair, Abilash
Soumya, S
author_sort Ajeesh, T
collection PubMed
description Background: Hand-held retinal camera (HRC) is a portable device which require less expertise and training with less image acquisition time in identifying diabetic retinopathy (DR). Aims and Objectives: To find out the diagnostic accuracy of HRC in identifying DR in comparison to the table top fundus camera (TTFC). Materials and Methods: Adults with diabetes mellitus irrespective of the type and duration, attending the ophthalmology clinic were randomly selected and initially subjected to retinal photography with TTFC on a dilated eye individually by an expert ophthalmologist followed by retinal photography with HRC by a trained resident. The best images of both the devices were graded by ophthalmologist according to the ETDRS classification with proper blinding of the photographs. Results: 101 subjects (191 eyes) with mean age of 56.86 + 10.75 years were evaluated. 45 eyes with Non Proliferative DR (NPDR) and 1 eye with Proliferative DR (PDR) were diagnosed with TTFC among which HRC identified retinopathy in 34 eyes (33 NPDR & 1 PDR). All 19 cases of Diabetic Macular edema (DME) were identified by HRC. HRC had sensitivity and specificity of 79.9% and 99.3% in diagnosing DR with a positive predictive value of 97.1%. Conclusion: HRC using mydriasis has good diagnostic accuracy in preliminary DR screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9067814
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90678142022-05-05 Abstract 147: The diagnostic accuracy of portable, non-contact, handheld retinal camera in screening diabetic retinopathy Ajeesh, T Jabbar, P K Das, Darvin V Indira, V Jayakumari, C Gomez, Ramesh Nair, Abilash Soumya, S Indian J Endocrinol Metab Abstracts … Esicon 2021 Background: Hand-held retinal camera (HRC) is a portable device which require less expertise and training with less image acquisition time in identifying diabetic retinopathy (DR). Aims and Objectives: To find out the diagnostic accuracy of HRC in identifying DR in comparison to the table top fundus camera (TTFC). Materials and Methods: Adults with diabetes mellitus irrespective of the type and duration, attending the ophthalmology clinic were randomly selected and initially subjected to retinal photography with TTFC on a dilated eye individually by an expert ophthalmologist followed by retinal photography with HRC by a trained resident. The best images of both the devices were graded by ophthalmologist according to the ETDRS classification with proper blinding of the photographs. Results: 101 subjects (191 eyes) with mean age of 56.86 + 10.75 years were evaluated. 45 eyes with Non Proliferative DR (NPDR) and 1 eye with Proliferative DR (PDR) were diagnosed with TTFC among which HRC identified retinopathy in 34 eyes (33 NPDR & 1 PDR). All 19 cases of Diabetic Macular edema (DME) were identified by HRC. HRC had sensitivity and specificity of 79.9% and 99.3% in diagnosing DR with a positive predictive value of 97.1%. Conclusion: HRC using mydriasis has good diagnostic accuracy in preliminary DR screening. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9067814/ http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.342272 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Abstracts … Esicon 2021
Ajeesh, T
Jabbar, P K
Das, Darvin V
Indira, V
Jayakumari, C
Gomez, Ramesh
Nair, Abilash
Soumya, S
Abstract 147: The diagnostic accuracy of portable, non-contact, handheld retinal camera in screening diabetic retinopathy
title Abstract 147: The diagnostic accuracy of portable, non-contact, handheld retinal camera in screening diabetic retinopathy
title_full Abstract 147: The diagnostic accuracy of portable, non-contact, handheld retinal camera in screening diabetic retinopathy
title_fullStr Abstract 147: The diagnostic accuracy of portable, non-contact, handheld retinal camera in screening diabetic retinopathy
title_full_unstemmed Abstract 147: The diagnostic accuracy of portable, non-contact, handheld retinal camera in screening diabetic retinopathy
title_short Abstract 147: The diagnostic accuracy of portable, non-contact, handheld retinal camera in screening diabetic retinopathy
title_sort abstract 147: the diagnostic accuracy of portable, non-contact, handheld retinal camera in screening diabetic retinopathy
topic Abstracts … Esicon 2021
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9067814/
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2230-8210.342272
work_keys_str_mv AT ajeesht abstract147thediagnosticaccuracyofportablenoncontacthandheldretinalcamerainscreeningdiabeticretinopathy
AT jabbarpk abstract147thediagnosticaccuracyofportablenoncontacthandheldretinalcamerainscreeningdiabeticretinopathy
AT dasdarvinv abstract147thediagnosticaccuracyofportablenoncontacthandheldretinalcamerainscreeningdiabeticretinopathy
AT indirav abstract147thediagnosticaccuracyofportablenoncontacthandheldretinalcamerainscreeningdiabeticretinopathy
AT jayakumaric abstract147thediagnosticaccuracyofportablenoncontacthandheldretinalcamerainscreeningdiabeticretinopathy
AT gomezramesh abstract147thediagnosticaccuracyofportablenoncontacthandheldretinalcamerainscreeningdiabeticretinopathy
AT nairabilash abstract147thediagnosticaccuracyofportablenoncontacthandheldretinalcamerainscreeningdiabeticretinopathy
AT soumyas abstract147thediagnosticaccuracyofportablenoncontacthandheldretinalcamerainscreeningdiabeticretinopathy