Cargando…

Faculty and applicant perceptions of virtual interviews on subspecialty fellowship match in obstetrics and gynecology

BACKGROUND: In response to COVID-19, the AAMC recommended that hospitals conduct interviews in a virtual setting. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether fellowship video conference interviews (VCIs) are an acceptable alternative to in-person interviews from both the applicant and program perspectives. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Armstrong, Abigail, Kroener, Lindsay, Cohen, Joshua G., Han, Christina S., Nitti, Victor W., Rible, Radhika, Brennan, Kathleen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9067945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35473575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2068993
_version_ 1784700122716700672
author Armstrong, Abigail
Kroener, Lindsay
Cohen, Joshua G.
Han, Christina S.
Nitti, Victor W.
Rible, Radhika
Brennan, Kathleen
author_facet Armstrong, Abigail
Kroener, Lindsay
Cohen, Joshua G.
Han, Christina S.
Nitti, Victor W.
Rible, Radhika
Brennan, Kathleen
author_sort Armstrong, Abigail
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In response to COVID-19, the AAMC recommended that hospitals conduct interviews in a virtual setting. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether fellowship video conference interviews (VCIs) are an acceptable alternative to in-person interviews from both the applicant and program perspectives. METHODS: Applicants and faculty from a single academic institution with five OBGYN subspecialty fellowship programs were invited to complete surveys regarding their experience using VCIs during the 2020 interview season. Survey responses used a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree). Comparative analyses between faculty and applicants responses to survey questions were performed with two-tailed Student’s t-tests. RESULTS: 45 faculty members and 131 applicants received the survey. Response rate for faculty members and applicants was 95.6% (n = 43) and 46.6% (n = 61), respectively. Faculty and applicants agreed that the VCIs allowed them to accurately represent themselves (83.7% vs. 88.6%, p = 0.48). Most applicants (62.3%, n = 38) reported a fundamental understanding of the fellowship’s culture. The majority of applicants (77.1%, n = 47) and faculty (72.1%, n = 31) agreed that they were able to develop connections during the virtual interview (p = 0.77). Faculty and applicants stated that VCIs assisted them in determining whether the candidate or program, respectively, was a good fit (83.7% vs. 67.2%, p = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: The VCI fellowship recruitment process allowed OBGYN fellowship applicants and programs to accurately represent themselves compared to in-person interviews. Most applicants and faculty were able to develop relationships over the virtual platform. Although not explicitly assessed, it is possible that the virtual interviews can achieve a suitable match between applicant and program across all OBGYN subspecialty fellowships. The VCI process may be a long-term resolution to minimize both the financial burden and time commitment presented by traditional in-person interviews. Follow-up studies should assess the performance of the virtually selected fellows compared to those selected in previous years using traditional in-person interviews.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9067945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90679452022-05-05 Faculty and applicant perceptions of virtual interviews on subspecialty fellowship match in obstetrics and gynecology Armstrong, Abigail Kroener, Lindsay Cohen, Joshua G. Han, Christina S. Nitti, Victor W. Rible, Radhika Brennan, Kathleen Med Educ Online Research Article BACKGROUND: In response to COVID-19, the AAMC recommended that hospitals conduct interviews in a virtual setting. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether fellowship video conference interviews (VCIs) are an acceptable alternative to in-person interviews from both the applicant and program perspectives. METHODS: Applicants and faculty from a single academic institution with five OBGYN subspecialty fellowship programs were invited to complete surveys regarding their experience using VCIs during the 2020 interview season. Survey responses used a 5-point Likert scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree). Comparative analyses between faculty and applicants responses to survey questions were performed with two-tailed Student’s t-tests. RESULTS: 45 faculty members and 131 applicants received the survey. Response rate for faculty members and applicants was 95.6% (n = 43) and 46.6% (n = 61), respectively. Faculty and applicants agreed that the VCIs allowed them to accurately represent themselves (83.7% vs. 88.6%, p = 0.48). Most applicants (62.3%, n = 38) reported a fundamental understanding of the fellowship’s culture. The majority of applicants (77.1%, n = 47) and faculty (72.1%, n = 31) agreed that they were able to develop connections during the virtual interview (p = 0.77). Faculty and applicants stated that VCIs assisted them in determining whether the candidate or program, respectively, was a good fit (83.7% vs. 67.2%, p = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: The VCI fellowship recruitment process allowed OBGYN fellowship applicants and programs to accurately represent themselves compared to in-person interviews. Most applicants and faculty were able to develop relationships over the virtual platform. Although not explicitly assessed, it is possible that the virtual interviews can achieve a suitable match between applicant and program across all OBGYN subspecialty fellowships. The VCI process may be a long-term resolution to minimize both the financial burden and time commitment presented by traditional in-person interviews. Follow-up studies should assess the performance of the virtually selected fellows compared to those selected in previous years using traditional in-person interviews. Taylor & Francis 2022-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9067945/ /pubmed/35473575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2068993 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Armstrong, Abigail
Kroener, Lindsay
Cohen, Joshua G.
Han, Christina S.
Nitti, Victor W.
Rible, Radhika
Brennan, Kathleen
Faculty and applicant perceptions of virtual interviews on subspecialty fellowship match in obstetrics and gynecology
title Faculty and applicant perceptions of virtual interviews on subspecialty fellowship match in obstetrics and gynecology
title_full Faculty and applicant perceptions of virtual interviews on subspecialty fellowship match in obstetrics and gynecology
title_fullStr Faculty and applicant perceptions of virtual interviews on subspecialty fellowship match in obstetrics and gynecology
title_full_unstemmed Faculty and applicant perceptions of virtual interviews on subspecialty fellowship match in obstetrics and gynecology
title_short Faculty and applicant perceptions of virtual interviews on subspecialty fellowship match in obstetrics and gynecology
title_sort faculty and applicant perceptions of virtual interviews on subspecialty fellowship match in obstetrics and gynecology
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9067945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35473575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2068993
work_keys_str_mv AT armstrongabigail facultyandapplicantperceptionsofvirtualinterviewsonsubspecialtyfellowshipmatchinobstetricsandgynecology
AT kroenerlindsay facultyandapplicantperceptionsofvirtualinterviewsonsubspecialtyfellowshipmatchinobstetricsandgynecology
AT cohenjoshuag facultyandapplicantperceptionsofvirtualinterviewsonsubspecialtyfellowshipmatchinobstetricsandgynecology
AT hanchristinas facultyandapplicantperceptionsofvirtualinterviewsonsubspecialtyfellowshipmatchinobstetricsandgynecology
AT nittivictorw facultyandapplicantperceptionsofvirtualinterviewsonsubspecialtyfellowshipmatchinobstetricsandgynecology
AT ribleradhika facultyandapplicantperceptionsofvirtualinterviewsonsubspecialtyfellowshipmatchinobstetricsandgynecology
AT brennankathleen facultyandapplicantperceptionsofvirtualinterviewsonsubspecialtyfellowshipmatchinobstetricsandgynecology