Cargando…

Automated MSCT Analysis for Planning Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Using Artificial Intelligence

BACKGROUND: The number of multislice computed tomography (MSCT) analyses performed for planning structural heart interventions is rapidly increasing. Further automation is required to save time, increase standardization, and reduce the learning curve. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to inve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michiels, Kilian, Heffinck, Eva, Astudillo, Patricio, Wong, Ivan, Mortier, Peter, Bavo, Alessandra Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9068333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35571991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5797431
_version_ 1784700203846074368
author Michiels, Kilian
Heffinck, Eva
Astudillo, Patricio
Wong, Ivan
Mortier, Peter
Bavo, Alessandra Maria
author_facet Michiels, Kilian
Heffinck, Eva
Astudillo, Patricio
Wong, Ivan
Mortier, Peter
Bavo, Alessandra Maria
author_sort Michiels, Kilian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The number of multislice computed tomography (MSCT) analyses performed for planning structural heart interventions is rapidly increasing. Further automation is required to save time, increase standardization, and reduce the learning curve. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a fully automated artificial intelligence (AI)-based MSCT analysis for planning structural heart interventions, focusing on left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) as the selected use case. METHODS: Different deep learning models were trained, validated, and tested using a cohort of 583 patients for which manually annotated data were available. These models were used independently or in combination to detect the anatomical ostium, the landing zone, the mitral valve annulus, and the fossa ovalis and to segment the left atrium (LA) and left atrial appendage (LAA). The accuracy of the models was evaluated through comparison with the manually annotated data. RESULTS: The automated analysis was performed on 25 randomly selected patients of the test cohort. The results were compared to the manually identified landmarks. The predicted segmentation of the LA(A) was similar to the manual segmentation (dice score of 0.94 ± 0.02). The difference between the automatically predicted and manually measured perimeter-based diameter was −0.8 ± 1.3 mm (anatomical ostium), −1.0 ± 1.5 mm (Amulet landing zone), and −0.1 ± 1.3 mm (Watchman FLX landing zone), which is similar to the operator variability on these measurements. Finally, the detected mitral valve annulus and fossa ovalis were close to the manual detection of these landmarks, as shown by the Hausdorff distance (3.9 ± 1.2 mm and 4.8 ± 1.8 mm, respectively). The average runtime of the complete workflow, including data pre- and postprocessing, was 57.5 ± 34.5 seconds. CONCLUSIONS: A fast and accurate AI-based workflow is proposed to automatically analyze MSCT images for planning LAAO. The approach, which can be easily extended toward other structural heart interventions, may help to handle the rapidly increasing volumes of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9068333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90683332022-05-12 Automated MSCT Analysis for Planning Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Using Artificial Intelligence Michiels, Kilian Heffinck, Eva Astudillo, Patricio Wong, Ivan Mortier, Peter Bavo, Alessandra Maria J Interv Cardiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The number of multislice computed tomography (MSCT) analyses performed for planning structural heart interventions is rapidly increasing. Further automation is required to save time, increase standardization, and reduce the learning curve. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a fully automated artificial intelligence (AI)-based MSCT analysis for planning structural heart interventions, focusing on left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) as the selected use case. METHODS: Different deep learning models were trained, validated, and tested using a cohort of 583 patients for which manually annotated data were available. These models were used independently or in combination to detect the anatomical ostium, the landing zone, the mitral valve annulus, and the fossa ovalis and to segment the left atrium (LA) and left atrial appendage (LAA). The accuracy of the models was evaluated through comparison with the manually annotated data. RESULTS: The automated analysis was performed on 25 randomly selected patients of the test cohort. The results were compared to the manually identified landmarks. The predicted segmentation of the LA(A) was similar to the manual segmentation (dice score of 0.94 ± 0.02). The difference between the automatically predicted and manually measured perimeter-based diameter was −0.8 ± 1.3 mm (anatomical ostium), −1.0 ± 1.5 mm (Amulet landing zone), and −0.1 ± 1.3 mm (Watchman FLX landing zone), which is similar to the operator variability on these measurements. Finally, the detected mitral valve annulus and fossa ovalis were close to the manual detection of these landmarks, as shown by the Hausdorff distance (3.9 ± 1.2 mm and 4.8 ± 1.8 mm, respectively). The average runtime of the complete workflow, including data pre- and postprocessing, was 57.5 ± 34.5 seconds. CONCLUSIONS: A fast and accurate AI-based workflow is proposed to automatically analyze MSCT images for planning LAAO. The approach, which can be easily extended toward other structural heart interventions, may help to handle the rapidly increasing volumes of patients. Hindawi 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9068333/ /pubmed/35571991 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5797431 Text en Copyright © 2022 Kilian Michiels et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Michiels, Kilian
Heffinck, Eva
Astudillo, Patricio
Wong, Ivan
Mortier, Peter
Bavo, Alessandra Maria
Automated MSCT Analysis for Planning Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Using Artificial Intelligence
title Automated MSCT Analysis for Planning Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Using Artificial Intelligence
title_full Automated MSCT Analysis for Planning Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Using Artificial Intelligence
title_fullStr Automated MSCT Analysis for Planning Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Using Artificial Intelligence
title_full_unstemmed Automated MSCT Analysis for Planning Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Using Artificial Intelligence
title_short Automated MSCT Analysis for Planning Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Using Artificial Intelligence
title_sort automated msct analysis for planning left atrial appendage occlusion using artificial intelligence
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9068333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35571991
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5797431
work_keys_str_mv AT michielskilian automatedmsctanalysisforplanningleftatrialappendageocclusionusingartificialintelligence
AT heffinckeva automatedmsctanalysisforplanningleftatrialappendageocclusionusingartificialintelligence
AT astudillopatricio automatedmsctanalysisforplanningleftatrialappendageocclusionusingartificialintelligence
AT wongivan automatedmsctanalysisforplanningleftatrialappendageocclusionusingartificialintelligence
AT mortierpeter automatedmsctanalysisforplanningleftatrialappendageocclusionusingartificialintelligence
AT bavoalessandramaria automatedmsctanalysisforplanningleftatrialappendageocclusionusingartificialintelligence