Cargando…

A comparison of telemedicine and in-person neurology visits: what are the factors that patients consider when selecting future visit type?

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that patients consider when choosing between future in-person, video, or telephone visits. BACKGROUND: Telemedicine has been rapidly integrated into ambulatory neurology in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Ambulatory neurology patients at a single center wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olszewski, Carly, Thomson, Sharon, Pring, Kelly, Cox, Siobhan, Merrill, Rebecca, Fishman, Emily, Ambrosini, Alexander, Soltany, Kevin Alexander, Bognet, Gabby, Strauss, Lauren, Graham, Rachel, Guzik, Amy, Strowd, Roy E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9068349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35508812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11149-0
_version_ 1784700207777185792
author Olszewski, Carly
Thomson, Sharon
Pring, Kelly
Cox, Siobhan
Merrill, Rebecca
Fishman, Emily
Ambrosini, Alexander
Soltany, Kevin Alexander
Bognet, Gabby
Strauss, Lauren
Graham, Rachel
Guzik, Amy
Strowd, Roy E.
author_facet Olszewski, Carly
Thomson, Sharon
Pring, Kelly
Cox, Siobhan
Merrill, Rebecca
Fishman, Emily
Ambrosini, Alexander
Soltany, Kevin Alexander
Bognet, Gabby
Strauss, Lauren
Graham, Rachel
Guzik, Amy
Strowd, Roy E.
author_sort Olszewski, Carly
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that patients consider when choosing between future in-person, video, or telephone visits. BACKGROUND: Telemedicine has been rapidly integrated into ambulatory neurology in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Ambulatory neurology patients at a single center were contacted via telephone to complete: (1) a survey quantifying likelihood of scheduling a future telemedicine visit, and (2) a semi-structured qualitative interview following their visit in March 2021. Data were processed using the principles of thematic analysis. RESULTS: Of 2493 visits, 39% assented to post-visit feedback; 74% were in-person visits and 13% video and telephone. Patients with in-person visits were less likely than those with video and telephone visits to “definitely” consider a future telemedicine visit (36 vs. 59 and 62%, respectively; p < 0.001). Patients considered five key factors when scheduling future visits: “Pros of Visit Type,” “Barriers to Telemedicine,” “Situational Context,” “Inherent Beliefs,” and “Extrinsic Variables.” Patients with telemedicine visits considered convenience as a pro, while those with in-person visits cited improved quality of care. Accessibility and user familiarity were considered barriers to telemedicine by patients with in-person and telephone visits, whereas system limitations were prevalent among patients with video visits. Patients agreed that stable conditions can be monitored via telemedicine, whereas physical examination warrants an in-person visit. Telemedicine was inherently considered equivalent to in-person care by patients with telephone visits. Awareness of telemedicine must be improved for patients with in-person visits. CONCLUSION: Across visit types, patients agree that telemedicine is convenient and effective in many circumstances. Future care delivery models should incorporate the patient perspective to implement hybrid models where telemedicine is an adjunct to in-person visits in ambulatory neurology. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-022-11149-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9068349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90683492022-05-05 A comparison of telemedicine and in-person neurology visits: what are the factors that patients consider when selecting future visit type? Olszewski, Carly Thomson, Sharon Pring, Kelly Cox, Siobhan Merrill, Rebecca Fishman, Emily Ambrosini, Alexander Soltany, Kevin Alexander Bognet, Gabby Strauss, Lauren Graham, Rachel Guzik, Amy Strowd, Roy E. J Neurol Original Communication OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that patients consider when choosing between future in-person, video, or telephone visits. BACKGROUND: Telemedicine has been rapidly integrated into ambulatory neurology in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Ambulatory neurology patients at a single center were contacted via telephone to complete: (1) a survey quantifying likelihood of scheduling a future telemedicine visit, and (2) a semi-structured qualitative interview following their visit in March 2021. Data were processed using the principles of thematic analysis. RESULTS: Of 2493 visits, 39% assented to post-visit feedback; 74% were in-person visits and 13% video and telephone. Patients with in-person visits were less likely than those with video and telephone visits to “definitely” consider a future telemedicine visit (36 vs. 59 and 62%, respectively; p < 0.001). Patients considered five key factors when scheduling future visits: “Pros of Visit Type,” “Barriers to Telemedicine,” “Situational Context,” “Inherent Beliefs,” and “Extrinsic Variables.” Patients with telemedicine visits considered convenience as a pro, while those with in-person visits cited improved quality of care. Accessibility and user familiarity were considered barriers to telemedicine by patients with in-person and telephone visits, whereas system limitations were prevalent among patients with video visits. Patients agreed that stable conditions can be monitored via telemedicine, whereas physical examination warrants an in-person visit. Telemedicine was inherently considered equivalent to in-person care by patients with telephone visits. Awareness of telemedicine must be improved for patients with in-person visits. CONCLUSION: Across visit types, patients agree that telemedicine is convenient and effective in many circumstances. Future care delivery models should incorporate the patient perspective to implement hybrid models where telemedicine is an adjunct to in-person visits in ambulatory neurology. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-022-11149-0. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-05-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9068349/ /pubmed/35508812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11149-0 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Communication
Olszewski, Carly
Thomson, Sharon
Pring, Kelly
Cox, Siobhan
Merrill, Rebecca
Fishman, Emily
Ambrosini, Alexander
Soltany, Kevin Alexander
Bognet, Gabby
Strauss, Lauren
Graham, Rachel
Guzik, Amy
Strowd, Roy E.
A comparison of telemedicine and in-person neurology visits: what are the factors that patients consider when selecting future visit type?
title A comparison of telemedicine and in-person neurology visits: what are the factors that patients consider when selecting future visit type?
title_full A comparison of telemedicine and in-person neurology visits: what are the factors that patients consider when selecting future visit type?
title_fullStr A comparison of telemedicine and in-person neurology visits: what are the factors that patients consider when selecting future visit type?
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of telemedicine and in-person neurology visits: what are the factors that patients consider when selecting future visit type?
title_short A comparison of telemedicine and in-person neurology visits: what are the factors that patients consider when selecting future visit type?
title_sort comparison of telemedicine and in-person neurology visits: what are the factors that patients consider when selecting future visit type?
topic Original Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9068349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35508812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11149-0
work_keys_str_mv AT olszewskicarly acomparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT thomsonsharon acomparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT pringkelly acomparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT coxsiobhan acomparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT merrillrebecca acomparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT fishmanemily acomparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT ambrosinialexander acomparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT soltanykevinalexander acomparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT bognetgabby acomparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT strausslauren acomparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT grahamrachel acomparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT guzikamy acomparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT strowdroye acomparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT olszewskicarly comparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT thomsonsharon comparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT pringkelly comparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT coxsiobhan comparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT merrillrebecca comparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT fishmanemily comparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT ambrosinialexander comparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT soltanykevinalexander comparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT bognetgabby comparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT strausslauren comparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT grahamrachel comparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT guzikamy comparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype
AT strowdroye comparisonoftelemedicineandinpersonneurologyvisitswhatarethefactorsthatpatientsconsiderwhenselectingfuturevisittype