Cargando…
Clinical and Mycological Features of Fungal Keratitis: A Retrospective Single-Center Study (2012-2018)
OBJECTIVES: To present the demographic, etiological, clinical, and mycological characteristics and treatment results of fungal keratitis patients admitted to our clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of patients diagnosed with fungal keratitis between October 2012 and 2018 were reviewed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Galenos Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9069087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35481727 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.09515 |
_version_ | 1784700352872841216 |
---|---|
author | Harbiyeli, İbrahim İnan Erdem, Elif Görkemli, Nuhkan İbayev, Astan Kandemir, Hazal Açıkalın, Arbil İlkit, Macit Yağmur, Meltem |
author_facet | Harbiyeli, İbrahim İnan Erdem, Elif Görkemli, Nuhkan İbayev, Astan Kandemir, Hazal Açıkalın, Arbil İlkit, Macit Yağmur, Meltem |
author_sort | Harbiyeli, İbrahim İnan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To present the demographic, etiological, clinical, and mycological characteristics and treatment results of fungal keratitis patients admitted to our clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of patients diagnosed with fungal keratitis between October 2012 and 2018 were reviewed. The diagnosis of fungal keratitis was confirmed mycologically and/or cytologically. Treatment response was defined as complete infiltrate resolution and re-epithelization with medical treatment and minor surgical interventions. Patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty or evisceration due to clinical deterioration despite treatment were classified as treatment nonresponders and were compared with responders in terms of demographic, etiological, and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Seventy-two (12.8%) of 559 patients diagnosed with microbial keratitis in the 6-year period were fungal keratitis. Of these, 38 cases (38 eyes) without polymicrobial etiology were included in the study. The patients’ mean age was 44.9±19.0 years (range: 2-80) and males predominated (14 females [36.8%], 24 males [63.2%]). Trauma (63.6%) was the most common predisposing factor in patients younger than 40 years old, whereas pathologies impairing ocular surface immunity were the leading risk factor (48.1%) in patients older than 40 years. Filamentous fungi were detected in 34 (89.5%) cases, while yeasts were found in 4 (10.5%) cases. Among 26 cases with positive cultures, Aspergillus species were the most common pathogens (42.3%). Infiltrate size before treatment was larger in nonresponders (14/38, 36.8%) compared to treatment responders (19/38, 50%) (p=0.049). In addition, rates of treatment response were higher in cases in which the infiltrate was located paracentrally compared to other cases (p=0.036). CONCLUSION: Fungal keratitis is an important public health problem in our region. Ocular trauma is a leading etiology in men under the age of 40 years. In the 6-year period, we observed that the main causes of fungal keratitis were filamentous fungi, and most commonly Aspergillus species. In cases presenting with large and central lesions, aggressive treatment options should be considered and these patients should be followed up more closely. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9069087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Galenos Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90690872022-05-13 Clinical and Mycological Features of Fungal Keratitis: A Retrospective Single-Center Study (2012-2018) Harbiyeli, İbrahim İnan Erdem, Elif Görkemli, Nuhkan İbayev, Astan Kandemir, Hazal Açıkalın, Arbil İlkit, Macit Yağmur, Meltem Turk J Ophthalmol Original Article OBJECTIVES: To present the demographic, etiological, clinical, and mycological characteristics and treatment results of fungal keratitis patients admitted to our clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of patients diagnosed with fungal keratitis between October 2012 and 2018 were reviewed. The diagnosis of fungal keratitis was confirmed mycologically and/or cytologically. Treatment response was defined as complete infiltrate resolution and re-epithelization with medical treatment and minor surgical interventions. Patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty or evisceration due to clinical deterioration despite treatment were classified as treatment nonresponders and were compared with responders in terms of demographic, etiological, and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Seventy-two (12.8%) of 559 patients diagnosed with microbial keratitis in the 6-year period were fungal keratitis. Of these, 38 cases (38 eyes) without polymicrobial etiology were included in the study. The patients’ mean age was 44.9±19.0 years (range: 2-80) and males predominated (14 females [36.8%], 24 males [63.2%]). Trauma (63.6%) was the most common predisposing factor in patients younger than 40 years old, whereas pathologies impairing ocular surface immunity were the leading risk factor (48.1%) in patients older than 40 years. Filamentous fungi were detected in 34 (89.5%) cases, while yeasts were found in 4 (10.5%) cases. Among 26 cases with positive cultures, Aspergillus species were the most common pathogens (42.3%). Infiltrate size before treatment was larger in nonresponders (14/38, 36.8%) compared to treatment responders (19/38, 50%) (p=0.049). In addition, rates of treatment response were higher in cases in which the infiltrate was located paracentrally compared to other cases (p=0.036). CONCLUSION: Fungal keratitis is an important public health problem in our region. Ocular trauma is a leading etiology in men under the age of 40 years. In the 6-year period, we observed that the main causes of fungal keratitis were filamentous fungi, and most commonly Aspergillus species. In cases presenting with large and central lesions, aggressive treatment options should be considered and these patients should be followed up more closely. Galenos Publishing 2022-04 2022-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9069087/ /pubmed/35481727 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.09515 Text en © Copyright 2022 by Turkish Ophthalmological Association | Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology, published by Galenos Publishing House. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Harbiyeli, İbrahim İnan Erdem, Elif Görkemli, Nuhkan İbayev, Astan Kandemir, Hazal Açıkalın, Arbil İlkit, Macit Yağmur, Meltem Clinical and Mycological Features of Fungal Keratitis: A Retrospective Single-Center Study (2012-2018) |
title | Clinical and Mycological Features of Fungal Keratitis: A Retrospective Single-Center Study (2012-2018) |
title_full | Clinical and Mycological Features of Fungal Keratitis: A Retrospective Single-Center Study (2012-2018) |
title_fullStr | Clinical and Mycological Features of Fungal Keratitis: A Retrospective Single-Center Study (2012-2018) |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical and Mycological Features of Fungal Keratitis: A Retrospective Single-Center Study (2012-2018) |
title_short | Clinical and Mycological Features of Fungal Keratitis: A Retrospective Single-Center Study (2012-2018) |
title_sort | clinical and mycological features of fungal keratitis: a retrospective single-center study (2012-2018) |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9069087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35481727 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2021.09515 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harbiyeliibrahiminan clinicalandmycologicalfeaturesoffungalkeratitisaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy20122018 AT erdemelif clinicalandmycologicalfeaturesoffungalkeratitisaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy20122018 AT gorkemlinuhkan clinicalandmycologicalfeaturesoffungalkeratitisaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy20122018 AT ibayevastan clinicalandmycologicalfeaturesoffungalkeratitisaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy20122018 AT kandemirhazal clinicalandmycologicalfeaturesoffungalkeratitisaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy20122018 AT acıkalınarbil clinicalandmycologicalfeaturesoffungalkeratitisaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy20122018 AT ilkitmacit clinicalandmycologicalfeaturesoffungalkeratitisaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy20122018 AT yagmurmeltem clinicalandmycologicalfeaturesoffungalkeratitisaretrospectivesinglecenterstudy20122018 |