Cargando…

Evaluation of the Clinical Findings of Patients with Penetrating Keratoplasty Followed by Telephone Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate changes in the clinical findings of keratoplasty patients who could not be examined face-to-face and were followed up by telephone during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with penetrating keratoplasty who presented to the corne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yarımada, Semir, Barut Selver, Özlem, Palamar, Melis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9069091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35481728
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2022.22725
_version_ 1784700353823899648
author Yarımada, Semir
Barut Selver, Özlem
Palamar, Melis
author_facet Yarımada, Semir
Barut Selver, Özlem
Palamar, Melis
author_sort Yarımada, Semir
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate changes in the clinical findings of keratoplasty patients who could not be examined face-to-face and were followed up by telephone during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with penetrating keratoplasty who presented to the cornea department between March 2020 and February 2021 were grouped according to whether they showed clinical deterioration (Group 1: no deterioration, Group 2: deterioration). The patients’ last visit prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and their first visit after the pandemic-related lockdown ended were evaluated. The demographic data, follow-up period, and ophthalmological examination findings of all patients were recorded and the data were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Thirty-five eyes of 35 patients were included in the study. Signs of deterioration were detected in 8 (22.8%) of the patients (Group 1), while no deterioration was detected in 27 (77.2%) of the patients (Group 2). In the last follow-up visit prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 1.26±0.43 LogMAR (range: 0.52-1.80) in Group 1 and 1.41±1.02 LogMAR (range: 0-3.1) in Group 2 (p=0.692). Mean BCVA in the first control during the pandemic was 2.07±0.86 LogMAR (range: 1.3-3.1) in Group 1 and 1.49±1.08 LogMAR (range: 0-3.1) in Group 2 (p=0.08). At the first visit during the COVID-19 pandemic, the mean intraocular pressure of Group 1 was 16.38±8.58 mmHg (range: 0-31), and Group 2 was 17.11±3.7 mmHg (range: 11-26) (p=0.984). CONCLUSION: The continuation of treatment initiated prior to the pandemic was probably the most important reason why deterioration was not observed in keratoplasty patients. In situations such as pandemics where face-to-face visits with patients may be disrupted, it may be possible to follow the patients safely with telemedicine visits until the difficult circumstances resolve.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9069091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90690912022-05-13 Evaluation of the Clinical Findings of Patients with Penetrating Keratoplasty Followed by Telephone Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic Yarımada, Semir Barut Selver, Özlem Palamar, Melis Turk J Ophthalmol Original Article OBJECTIVES: To evaluate changes in the clinical findings of keratoplasty patients who could not be examined face-to-face and were followed up by telephone during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with penetrating keratoplasty who presented to the cornea department between March 2020 and February 2021 were grouped according to whether they showed clinical deterioration (Group 1: no deterioration, Group 2: deterioration). The patients’ last visit prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and their first visit after the pandemic-related lockdown ended were evaluated. The demographic data, follow-up period, and ophthalmological examination findings of all patients were recorded and the data were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Thirty-five eyes of 35 patients were included in the study. Signs of deterioration were detected in 8 (22.8%) of the patients (Group 1), while no deterioration was detected in 27 (77.2%) of the patients (Group 2). In the last follow-up visit prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, mean best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 1.26±0.43 LogMAR (range: 0.52-1.80) in Group 1 and 1.41±1.02 LogMAR (range: 0-3.1) in Group 2 (p=0.692). Mean BCVA in the first control during the pandemic was 2.07±0.86 LogMAR (range: 1.3-3.1) in Group 1 and 1.49±1.08 LogMAR (range: 0-3.1) in Group 2 (p=0.08). At the first visit during the COVID-19 pandemic, the mean intraocular pressure of Group 1 was 16.38±8.58 mmHg (range: 0-31), and Group 2 was 17.11±3.7 mmHg (range: 11-26) (p=0.984). CONCLUSION: The continuation of treatment initiated prior to the pandemic was probably the most important reason why deterioration was not observed in keratoplasty patients. In situations such as pandemics where face-to-face visits with patients may be disrupted, it may be possible to follow the patients safely with telemedicine visits until the difficult circumstances resolve. Galenos Publishing 2022-04 2022-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9069091/ /pubmed/35481728 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2022.22725 Text en © Copyright 2022 by Turkish Ophthalmological Association | Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology, published by Galenos Publishing House. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yarımada, Semir
Barut Selver, Özlem
Palamar, Melis
Evaluation of the Clinical Findings of Patients with Penetrating Keratoplasty Followed by Telephone Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic
title Evaluation of the Clinical Findings of Patients with Penetrating Keratoplasty Followed by Telephone Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full Evaluation of the Clinical Findings of Patients with Penetrating Keratoplasty Followed by Telephone Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Clinical Findings of Patients with Penetrating Keratoplasty Followed by Telephone Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Clinical Findings of Patients with Penetrating Keratoplasty Followed by Telephone Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_short Evaluation of the Clinical Findings of Patients with Penetrating Keratoplasty Followed by Telephone Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic
title_sort evaluation of the clinical findings of patients with penetrating keratoplasty followed by telephone due to the covid-19 pandemic
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9069091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35481728
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2022.22725
work_keys_str_mv AT yarımadasemir evaluationoftheclinicalfindingsofpatientswithpenetratingkeratoplastyfollowedbytelephoneduetothecovid19pandemic
AT barutselverozlem evaluationoftheclinicalfindingsofpatientswithpenetratingkeratoplastyfollowedbytelephoneduetothecovid19pandemic
AT palamarmelis evaluationoftheclinicalfindingsofpatientswithpenetratingkeratoplastyfollowedbytelephoneduetothecovid19pandemic