Cargando…

Arthroscopic Treatment of Popliteus Tendinitis Using the Accessory Portal

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of arthroscopic treatment of popliteus tendinitis via an auxiliary extreme lateral approach and to investigate the pathogenesis and treatment of popliteus tendinitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2016 to 2020, arthroscopic popliteus tendon ablatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, B., Liu, H. K., Wang, H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9069127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35529907
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.860300
_version_ 1784700362641375232
author Chen, B.
Liu, H. K.
Wang, H.
author_facet Chen, B.
Liu, H. K.
Wang, H.
author_sort Chen, B.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of arthroscopic treatment of popliteus tendinitis via an auxiliary extreme lateral approach and to investigate the pathogenesis and treatment of popliteus tendinitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2016 to 2020, arthroscopic popliteus tendon ablation was performed in 15 patients (15 knees) with popliteus tendinitis via an auxiliary extreme lateral approach. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Lysholm knee scoring scale, the Tegner score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score at the 24-month follow-up after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients (mean age, 51.1 ± 7.1 years) were included. They had a mean body mass index of 23.8 ± 2.1 kg/m(2). The minimum follow-up period was 24 months. Comparing the postoperative state to the preoperative state, the mean postoperative Lysholm score, Tegner score, and IKDC score improved significantly from 70.0 ± 5.0, 3.0 ± 0.9, and 62.3 ± 5.5 to 89.3 ± 4.2, 4.6 ± 0.61, and 80.5 ± 4.4, respectively (p < 0.01). The preoperative VAS score for pain improved from 6.4 ± 0.5 to 0.9 ± 0.4 (p < 0.01). No patients were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Following arthroscopic-assisted treatment, all the patients with popliteus tendinitis achieved satisfactory clinical outcomes in terms of pain relief and improved function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9069127
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90691272022-05-05 Arthroscopic Treatment of Popliteus Tendinitis Using the Accessory Portal Chen, B. Liu, H. K. Wang, H. Front Surg Surgery INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of arthroscopic treatment of popliteus tendinitis via an auxiliary extreme lateral approach and to investigate the pathogenesis and treatment of popliteus tendinitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2016 to 2020, arthroscopic popliteus tendon ablation was performed in 15 patients (15 knees) with popliteus tendinitis via an auxiliary extreme lateral approach. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Lysholm knee scoring scale, the Tegner score, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score and the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score at the 24-month follow-up after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients (mean age, 51.1 ± 7.1 years) were included. They had a mean body mass index of 23.8 ± 2.1 kg/m(2). The minimum follow-up period was 24 months. Comparing the postoperative state to the preoperative state, the mean postoperative Lysholm score, Tegner score, and IKDC score improved significantly from 70.0 ± 5.0, 3.0 ± 0.9, and 62.3 ± 5.5 to 89.3 ± 4.2, 4.6 ± 0.61, and 80.5 ± 4.4, respectively (p < 0.01). The preoperative VAS score for pain improved from 6.4 ± 0.5 to 0.9 ± 0.4 (p < 0.01). No patients were lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Following arthroscopic-assisted treatment, all the patients with popliteus tendinitis achieved satisfactory clinical outcomes in terms of pain relief and improved function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9069127/ /pubmed/35529907 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.860300 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chen, Liu and Wang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Chen, B.
Liu, H. K.
Wang, H.
Arthroscopic Treatment of Popliteus Tendinitis Using the Accessory Portal
title Arthroscopic Treatment of Popliteus Tendinitis Using the Accessory Portal
title_full Arthroscopic Treatment of Popliteus Tendinitis Using the Accessory Portal
title_fullStr Arthroscopic Treatment of Popliteus Tendinitis Using the Accessory Portal
title_full_unstemmed Arthroscopic Treatment of Popliteus Tendinitis Using the Accessory Portal
title_short Arthroscopic Treatment of Popliteus Tendinitis Using the Accessory Portal
title_sort arthroscopic treatment of popliteus tendinitis using the accessory portal
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9069127/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35529907
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2022.860300
work_keys_str_mv AT chenb arthroscopictreatmentofpopliteustendinitisusingtheaccessoryportal
AT liuhk arthroscopictreatmentofpopliteustendinitisusingtheaccessoryportal
AT wangh arthroscopictreatmentofpopliteustendinitisusingtheaccessoryportal