Cargando…

Teaching writing in primary education (grades 1–6) in Australia: a national survey

Providing adequate writing instruction and practice in schools is an essential cornerstone of writing development and it affords a diagnostic approach for teachers. But what writing instruction is being practiced in Australian primary schools? The aim of this study was to survey a sample of teachers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Abreu Malpique, Anabela, Valcan, Debora, Pino-Pasternak, Deborah, Ledger, Susan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9069425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35530430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10294-2
_version_ 1784700427318591488
author de Abreu Malpique, Anabela
Valcan, Debora
Pino-Pasternak, Deborah
Ledger, Susan
author_facet de Abreu Malpique, Anabela
Valcan, Debora
Pino-Pasternak, Deborah
Ledger, Susan
author_sort de Abreu Malpique, Anabela
collection PubMed
description Providing adequate writing instruction and practice in schools is an essential cornerstone of writing development and it affords a diagnostic approach for teachers. But what writing instruction is being practiced in Australian primary schools? The aim of this study was to survey a sample of teachers (n = 310) about their instructional practices for writing and their preparation and self-efficacy to teach writing. The majority of the teachers surveyed indicated they allocated on average less than three hours per week for writing practice in their classrooms, with findings further showing a large variability in the frequency of writing practice ranging from 15 min to 7.5 h per week. Findings suggested an emphasis placed on teaching foundational skills, such as spelling, over the teaching of process skills, such as planning and revising. Results further indicated that less emphasis is placed on teaching handwriting and typing. The majority of participating teachers reported implementing only six of the 20 different instructional practices included in the survey on a weekly basis, with school-home strategies being the least frequently reported strategies to foster students’ writing development. Most teachers expressed positive beliefs about their preparation and self-efficacy for teaching writing. Results from multiple regression analysis showed that preparation and self-efficacy for teaching writing significantly and statistically accounted for variability in using evidence-based practices, teaching foundational skills, and teaching process skills. However, only self-efficacy made a statically significant contribution to predicting strategies to extend writing to the home environment. Implications for teaching and recommendations for research are provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9069425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90694252022-05-04 Teaching writing in primary education (grades 1–6) in Australia: a national survey de Abreu Malpique, Anabela Valcan, Debora Pino-Pasternak, Deborah Ledger, Susan Read Writ Article Providing adequate writing instruction and practice in schools is an essential cornerstone of writing development and it affords a diagnostic approach for teachers. But what writing instruction is being practiced in Australian primary schools? The aim of this study was to survey a sample of teachers (n = 310) about their instructional practices for writing and their preparation and self-efficacy to teach writing. The majority of the teachers surveyed indicated they allocated on average less than three hours per week for writing practice in their classrooms, with findings further showing a large variability in the frequency of writing practice ranging from 15 min to 7.5 h per week. Findings suggested an emphasis placed on teaching foundational skills, such as spelling, over the teaching of process skills, such as planning and revising. Results further indicated that less emphasis is placed on teaching handwriting and typing. The majority of participating teachers reported implementing only six of the 20 different instructional practices included in the survey on a weekly basis, with school-home strategies being the least frequently reported strategies to foster students’ writing development. Most teachers expressed positive beliefs about their preparation and self-efficacy for teaching writing. Results from multiple regression analysis showed that preparation and self-efficacy for teaching writing significantly and statistically accounted for variability in using evidence-based practices, teaching foundational skills, and teaching process skills. However, only self-efficacy made a statically significant contribution to predicting strategies to extend writing to the home environment. Implications for teaching and recommendations for research are provided. Springer Netherlands 2022-05-05 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9069425/ /pubmed/35530430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10294-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
de Abreu Malpique, Anabela
Valcan, Debora
Pino-Pasternak, Deborah
Ledger, Susan
Teaching writing in primary education (grades 1–6) in Australia: a national survey
title Teaching writing in primary education (grades 1–6) in Australia: a national survey
title_full Teaching writing in primary education (grades 1–6) in Australia: a national survey
title_fullStr Teaching writing in primary education (grades 1–6) in Australia: a national survey
title_full_unstemmed Teaching writing in primary education (grades 1–6) in Australia: a national survey
title_short Teaching writing in primary education (grades 1–6) in Australia: a national survey
title_sort teaching writing in primary education (grades 1–6) in australia: a national survey
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9069425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35530430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10294-2
work_keys_str_mv AT deabreumalpiqueanabela teachingwritinginprimaryeducationgrades16inaustraliaanationalsurvey
AT valcandebora teachingwritinginprimaryeducationgrades16inaustraliaanationalsurvey
AT pinopasternakdeborah teachingwritinginprimaryeducationgrades16inaustraliaanationalsurvey
AT ledgersusan teachingwritinginprimaryeducationgrades16inaustraliaanationalsurvey