Cargando…

Distinct sequence features underlie microdeletions and gross deletions in the human genome

Microdeletions and gross deletions are important causes (~20%) of human inherited disease and their genomic locations are strongly influenced by the local DNA sequence environment. This notwithstanding, no study has systematically examined their underlying generative mechanisms. Here, we obtained 42...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qi, Mengling, Stenson, Peter D., Ball, Edward V., Tainer, John A., Bacolla, Albino, Kehrer‐Sawatzki, Hildegard, Cooper, David N., Zhao, Huiying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9069542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34918412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/humu.24314
_version_ 1784700453532991488
author Qi, Mengling
Stenson, Peter D.
Ball, Edward V.
Tainer, John A.
Bacolla, Albino
Kehrer‐Sawatzki, Hildegard
Cooper, David N.
Zhao, Huiying
author_facet Qi, Mengling
Stenson, Peter D.
Ball, Edward V.
Tainer, John A.
Bacolla, Albino
Kehrer‐Sawatzki, Hildegard
Cooper, David N.
Zhao, Huiying
author_sort Qi, Mengling
collection PubMed
description Microdeletions and gross deletions are important causes (~20%) of human inherited disease and their genomic locations are strongly influenced by the local DNA sequence environment. This notwithstanding, no study has systematically examined their underlying generative mechanisms. Here, we obtained 42,098 pathogenic microdeletions and gross deletions from the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) that together form a continuum of germline deletions ranging in size from 1 to 28,394,429 bp. We analyzed the DNA sequence within 1 kb of the breakpoint junctions and found that the frequencies of non‐B DNA‐forming repeats, GC‐content, and the presence of seven of 78 specific sequence motifs in the vicinity of pathogenic deletions correlated with deletion length for deletions of length ≤30 bp. Further, we found that the presence of DR, GQ, and STR repeats is important for the formation of longer deletions (>30 bp) but not for the formation of shorter deletions (≤30 bp) while significantly (χ (2), p < 2E−16) more microhomologies were identified flanking short deletions than long deletions (length >30 bp). We provide evidence to support a functional distinction between microdeletions and gross deletions. Finally, we propose that a deletion length cut‐off of 25–30 bp may serve as an objective means to functionally distinguish microdeletions from gross deletions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9069542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90695422022-10-14 Distinct sequence features underlie microdeletions and gross deletions in the human genome Qi, Mengling Stenson, Peter D. Ball, Edward V. Tainer, John A. Bacolla, Albino Kehrer‐Sawatzki, Hildegard Cooper, David N. Zhao, Huiying Hum Mutat Research Articles Microdeletions and gross deletions are important causes (~20%) of human inherited disease and their genomic locations are strongly influenced by the local DNA sequence environment. This notwithstanding, no study has systematically examined their underlying generative mechanisms. Here, we obtained 42,098 pathogenic microdeletions and gross deletions from the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) that together form a continuum of germline deletions ranging in size from 1 to 28,394,429 bp. We analyzed the DNA sequence within 1 kb of the breakpoint junctions and found that the frequencies of non‐B DNA‐forming repeats, GC‐content, and the presence of seven of 78 specific sequence motifs in the vicinity of pathogenic deletions correlated with deletion length for deletions of length ≤30 bp. Further, we found that the presence of DR, GQ, and STR repeats is important for the formation of longer deletions (>30 bp) but not for the formation of shorter deletions (≤30 bp) while significantly (χ (2), p < 2E−16) more microhomologies were identified flanking short deletions than long deletions (length >30 bp). We provide evidence to support a functional distinction between microdeletions and gross deletions. Finally, we propose that a deletion length cut‐off of 25–30 bp may serve as an objective means to functionally distinguish microdeletions from gross deletions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-01 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9069542/ /pubmed/34918412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/humu.24314 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Human Mutation published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Qi, Mengling
Stenson, Peter D.
Ball, Edward V.
Tainer, John A.
Bacolla, Albino
Kehrer‐Sawatzki, Hildegard
Cooper, David N.
Zhao, Huiying
Distinct sequence features underlie microdeletions and gross deletions in the human genome
title Distinct sequence features underlie microdeletions and gross deletions in the human genome
title_full Distinct sequence features underlie microdeletions and gross deletions in the human genome
title_fullStr Distinct sequence features underlie microdeletions and gross deletions in the human genome
title_full_unstemmed Distinct sequence features underlie microdeletions and gross deletions in the human genome
title_short Distinct sequence features underlie microdeletions and gross deletions in the human genome
title_sort distinct sequence features underlie microdeletions and gross deletions in the human genome
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9069542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34918412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/humu.24314
work_keys_str_mv AT qimengling distinctsequencefeaturesunderliemicrodeletionsandgrossdeletionsinthehumangenome
AT stensonpeterd distinctsequencefeaturesunderliemicrodeletionsandgrossdeletionsinthehumangenome
AT balledwardv distinctsequencefeaturesunderliemicrodeletionsandgrossdeletionsinthehumangenome
AT tainerjohna distinctsequencefeaturesunderliemicrodeletionsandgrossdeletionsinthehumangenome
AT bacollaalbino distinctsequencefeaturesunderliemicrodeletionsandgrossdeletionsinthehumangenome
AT kehrersawatzkihildegard distinctsequencefeaturesunderliemicrodeletionsandgrossdeletionsinthehumangenome
AT cooperdavidn distinctsequencefeaturesunderliemicrodeletionsandgrossdeletionsinthehumangenome
AT zhaohuiying distinctsequencefeaturesunderliemicrodeletionsandgrossdeletionsinthehumangenome