Cargando…
Distinct sequence features underlie microdeletions and gross deletions in the human genome
Microdeletions and gross deletions are important causes (~20%) of human inherited disease and their genomic locations are strongly influenced by the local DNA sequence environment. This notwithstanding, no study has systematically examined their underlying generative mechanisms. Here, we obtained 42...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9069542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34918412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/humu.24314 |
_version_ | 1784700453532991488 |
---|---|
author | Qi, Mengling Stenson, Peter D. Ball, Edward V. Tainer, John A. Bacolla, Albino Kehrer‐Sawatzki, Hildegard Cooper, David N. Zhao, Huiying |
author_facet | Qi, Mengling Stenson, Peter D. Ball, Edward V. Tainer, John A. Bacolla, Albino Kehrer‐Sawatzki, Hildegard Cooper, David N. Zhao, Huiying |
author_sort | Qi, Mengling |
collection | PubMed |
description | Microdeletions and gross deletions are important causes (~20%) of human inherited disease and their genomic locations are strongly influenced by the local DNA sequence environment. This notwithstanding, no study has systematically examined their underlying generative mechanisms. Here, we obtained 42,098 pathogenic microdeletions and gross deletions from the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) that together form a continuum of germline deletions ranging in size from 1 to 28,394,429 bp. We analyzed the DNA sequence within 1 kb of the breakpoint junctions and found that the frequencies of non‐B DNA‐forming repeats, GC‐content, and the presence of seven of 78 specific sequence motifs in the vicinity of pathogenic deletions correlated with deletion length for deletions of length ≤30 bp. Further, we found that the presence of DR, GQ, and STR repeats is important for the formation of longer deletions (>30 bp) but not for the formation of shorter deletions (≤30 bp) while significantly (χ (2), p < 2E−16) more microhomologies were identified flanking short deletions than long deletions (length >30 bp). We provide evidence to support a functional distinction between microdeletions and gross deletions. Finally, we propose that a deletion length cut‐off of 25–30 bp may serve as an objective means to functionally distinguish microdeletions from gross deletions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9069542 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90695422022-10-14 Distinct sequence features underlie microdeletions and gross deletions in the human genome Qi, Mengling Stenson, Peter D. Ball, Edward V. Tainer, John A. Bacolla, Albino Kehrer‐Sawatzki, Hildegard Cooper, David N. Zhao, Huiying Hum Mutat Research Articles Microdeletions and gross deletions are important causes (~20%) of human inherited disease and their genomic locations are strongly influenced by the local DNA sequence environment. This notwithstanding, no study has systematically examined their underlying generative mechanisms. Here, we obtained 42,098 pathogenic microdeletions and gross deletions from the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) that together form a continuum of germline deletions ranging in size from 1 to 28,394,429 bp. We analyzed the DNA sequence within 1 kb of the breakpoint junctions and found that the frequencies of non‐B DNA‐forming repeats, GC‐content, and the presence of seven of 78 specific sequence motifs in the vicinity of pathogenic deletions correlated with deletion length for deletions of length ≤30 bp. Further, we found that the presence of DR, GQ, and STR repeats is important for the formation of longer deletions (>30 bp) but not for the formation of shorter deletions (≤30 bp) while significantly (χ (2), p < 2E−16) more microhomologies were identified flanking short deletions than long deletions (length >30 bp). We provide evidence to support a functional distinction between microdeletions and gross deletions. Finally, we propose that a deletion length cut‐off of 25–30 bp may serve as an objective means to functionally distinguish microdeletions from gross deletions. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-01 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9069542/ /pubmed/34918412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/humu.24314 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Human Mutation published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Qi, Mengling Stenson, Peter D. Ball, Edward V. Tainer, John A. Bacolla, Albino Kehrer‐Sawatzki, Hildegard Cooper, David N. Zhao, Huiying Distinct sequence features underlie microdeletions and gross deletions in the human genome |
title | Distinct sequence features underlie microdeletions and gross deletions in the human genome |
title_full | Distinct sequence features underlie microdeletions and gross deletions in the human genome |
title_fullStr | Distinct sequence features underlie microdeletions and gross deletions in the human genome |
title_full_unstemmed | Distinct sequence features underlie microdeletions and gross deletions in the human genome |
title_short | Distinct sequence features underlie microdeletions and gross deletions in the human genome |
title_sort | distinct sequence features underlie microdeletions and gross deletions in the human genome |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9069542/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34918412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/humu.24314 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qimengling distinctsequencefeaturesunderliemicrodeletionsandgrossdeletionsinthehumangenome AT stensonpeterd distinctsequencefeaturesunderliemicrodeletionsandgrossdeletionsinthehumangenome AT balledwardv distinctsequencefeaturesunderliemicrodeletionsandgrossdeletionsinthehumangenome AT tainerjohna distinctsequencefeaturesunderliemicrodeletionsandgrossdeletionsinthehumangenome AT bacollaalbino distinctsequencefeaturesunderliemicrodeletionsandgrossdeletionsinthehumangenome AT kehrersawatzkihildegard distinctsequencefeaturesunderliemicrodeletionsandgrossdeletionsinthehumangenome AT cooperdavidn distinctsequencefeaturesunderliemicrodeletionsandgrossdeletionsinthehumangenome AT zhaohuiying distinctsequencefeaturesunderliemicrodeletionsandgrossdeletionsinthehumangenome |