Cargando…

Achieving Theory–Experiment Parity for Activity and Selectivity in Heterogeneous Catalysis Using Microkinetic Modeling

[Image: see text] Microkinetic modeling based on density functional theory (DFT) energies plays an essential role in heterogeneous catalysis because it reveals the fundamental chemistry for catalytic reactions and bridges the microscopic understanding from theoretical calculations and experimental o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Wenbo, Xu, Jiayan, Chen, Jianfu, Wang, Haifeng, Hu, P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9069691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35442027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00058
_version_ 1784700484889608192
author Xie, Wenbo
Xu, Jiayan
Chen, Jianfu
Wang, Haifeng
Hu, P.
author_facet Xie, Wenbo
Xu, Jiayan
Chen, Jianfu
Wang, Haifeng
Hu, P.
author_sort Xie, Wenbo
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Microkinetic modeling based on density functional theory (DFT) energies plays an essential role in heterogeneous catalysis because it reveals the fundamental chemistry for catalytic reactions and bridges the microscopic understanding from theoretical calculations and experimental observations. Microkinetic modeling requires building a set of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) based on the calculation results of thermodynamic properties of adsorbates and kinetic parameters for the reaction elementary steps. Solving a microkinetic model can extract information on catalytic chemistry, including critical reaction intermediates, reaction pathways, the surface species distribution, activity, and selectivity, thus providing vital guidelines for altering catalysts. However, the quantitative reliability of traditional microkinetic models is often insufficient to conclusively extrapolate the mechanistic details of complex reaction systems. This can be attributed to several factors, the most important of which is the limitation of obtaining an accurate estimation of the energy inputs via traditional calculation methods. These limitations include the difficulty of using static DFT methods to calculate reaction energies of adsorption/desorption processes, often rate-controlling or selectivity-determining steps, and the inadequate consideration of surface coverage effects. In addition, the robust microkinetic software is rare, which also complicates the resolution of complex catalytic systems. In this Account, we review our recent works toward refining the predictions of microkinetic modeling in heterogeneous catalysis and achieving theory–experiment parity for activity and selectivity. First, we introduce CATKINAS, a microkinetic software developed in our group, and show how it disentangles the problem that traditional microkinetic software has and how it can now be applied to obtain kinetic results for more sophisticated reaction systems. Second, we describe a molecular dynamics method developed recently to obtain the free-energy changes for the adsorption/desorption process to fill in the missing energy inputs. Third, we show that a rigorous consideration of surface coverage effects is pivotal for building more realistic models and obtaining accurate kinetic results. Following a series of studies on acetylene hydrogenation reactions on Pd catalysts, we demonstrate how this new approach can provide an improved quantitative understanding of the mechanism, active site, and intrinsic structural sensitivity. Finally, we conclude with a brief outlook and the remaining challenges in this field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9069691
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90696912022-05-06 Achieving Theory–Experiment Parity for Activity and Selectivity in Heterogeneous Catalysis Using Microkinetic Modeling Xie, Wenbo Xu, Jiayan Chen, Jianfu Wang, Haifeng Hu, P. Acc Chem Res [Image: see text] Microkinetic modeling based on density functional theory (DFT) energies plays an essential role in heterogeneous catalysis because it reveals the fundamental chemistry for catalytic reactions and bridges the microscopic understanding from theoretical calculations and experimental observations. Microkinetic modeling requires building a set of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) based on the calculation results of thermodynamic properties of adsorbates and kinetic parameters for the reaction elementary steps. Solving a microkinetic model can extract information on catalytic chemistry, including critical reaction intermediates, reaction pathways, the surface species distribution, activity, and selectivity, thus providing vital guidelines for altering catalysts. However, the quantitative reliability of traditional microkinetic models is often insufficient to conclusively extrapolate the mechanistic details of complex reaction systems. This can be attributed to several factors, the most important of which is the limitation of obtaining an accurate estimation of the energy inputs via traditional calculation methods. These limitations include the difficulty of using static DFT methods to calculate reaction energies of adsorption/desorption processes, often rate-controlling or selectivity-determining steps, and the inadequate consideration of surface coverage effects. In addition, the robust microkinetic software is rare, which also complicates the resolution of complex catalytic systems. In this Account, we review our recent works toward refining the predictions of microkinetic modeling in heterogeneous catalysis and achieving theory–experiment parity for activity and selectivity. First, we introduce CATKINAS, a microkinetic software developed in our group, and show how it disentangles the problem that traditional microkinetic software has and how it can now be applied to obtain kinetic results for more sophisticated reaction systems. Second, we describe a molecular dynamics method developed recently to obtain the free-energy changes for the adsorption/desorption process to fill in the missing energy inputs. Third, we show that a rigorous consideration of surface coverage effects is pivotal for building more realistic models and obtaining accurate kinetic results. Following a series of studies on acetylene hydrogenation reactions on Pd catalysts, we demonstrate how this new approach can provide an improved quantitative understanding of the mechanism, active site, and intrinsic structural sensitivity. Finally, we conclude with a brief outlook and the remaining challenges in this field. American Chemical Society 2022-04-20 2022-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9069691/ /pubmed/35442027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00058 Text en © 2022 American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Xie, Wenbo
Xu, Jiayan
Chen, Jianfu
Wang, Haifeng
Hu, P.
Achieving Theory–Experiment Parity for Activity and Selectivity in Heterogeneous Catalysis Using Microkinetic Modeling
title Achieving Theory–Experiment Parity for Activity and Selectivity in Heterogeneous Catalysis Using Microkinetic Modeling
title_full Achieving Theory–Experiment Parity for Activity and Selectivity in Heterogeneous Catalysis Using Microkinetic Modeling
title_fullStr Achieving Theory–Experiment Parity for Activity and Selectivity in Heterogeneous Catalysis Using Microkinetic Modeling
title_full_unstemmed Achieving Theory–Experiment Parity for Activity and Selectivity in Heterogeneous Catalysis Using Microkinetic Modeling
title_short Achieving Theory–Experiment Parity for Activity and Selectivity in Heterogeneous Catalysis Using Microkinetic Modeling
title_sort achieving theory–experiment parity for activity and selectivity in heterogeneous catalysis using microkinetic modeling
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9069691/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35442027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00058
work_keys_str_mv AT xiewenbo achievingtheoryexperimentparityforactivityandselectivityinheterogeneouscatalysisusingmicrokineticmodeling
AT xujiayan achievingtheoryexperimentparityforactivityandselectivityinheterogeneouscatalysisusingmicrokineticmodeling
AT chenjianfu achievingtheoryexperimentparityforactivityandselectivityinheterogeneouscatalysisusingmicrokineticmodeling
AT wanghaifeng achievingtheoryexperimentparityforactivityandselectivityinheterogeneouscatalysisusingmicrokineticmodeling
AT hup achievingtheoryexperimentparityforactivityandselectivityinheterogeneouscatalysisusingmicrokineticmodeling