Cargando…
Reflecting on the utility of standardized uptake values on (18)F-FDG PET in nasopharyngeal carcinoma
BACKGROUND: To rethink the clinical significance of standardized uptake values (SUVs) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) on (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 369 NPC patients who underwent pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET. The pred...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9069730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09626-w |
_version_ | 1784700492385878016 |
---|---|
author | Qiu, Xiufang Wu, Haixia Xu, Ting Xie, Shihan You, Ziqing Hu, Yixin Zheng, Yinghong Liang, Zewei Huang, Chaoxiong Yi, Li Li, Li Liu, Jing Fei, Zhaodong Chen, Chuanben |
author_facet | Qiu, Xiufang Wu, Haixia Xu, Ting Xie, Shihan You, Ziqing Hu, Yixin Zheng, Yinghong Liang, Zewei Huang, Chaoxiong Yi, Li Li, Li Liu, Jing Fei, Zhaodong Chen, Chuanben |
author_sort | Qiu, Xiufang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To rethink the clinical significance of standardized uptake values (SUVs) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) on (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 369 NPC patients who underwent pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET. The predictive value of the SUVmax of the primary tumor (SUVmax-t) and regional lymph nodes (SUVmax-n) was evaluated using probability density functions. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine optimal cutoffs for the SUVmax-n/SUVmax-t ratio (NTR). Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to assess survival. RESULTS: The optimal SUVmax-t and SUVmax-n cutoffs were 7.5 and 6.9, respectively. High SUVmax-t and SUVmax-n were related to local and regional recurrence, respectively. Patients with low SUVmax had better 3-year overall survival (OS). To avoid cross-sensitization of cutoff points, we stratified patients with high SUVmax into the low and high NTR groups. The 3-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS; 92.3 vs. 80.6%, P = 0.009), progression-free survival (PFS; 84.0 vs. 67.7%, P = 0.011), and OS (95.9 vs. 89.2%, P = 0.002) significantly differed between the high vs. low NTR groups for patients with high SUVmax. Multivariable analysis showed that NTR was an independent prognostic factor for DMFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.037, 95% CI: 1.039–3.992, P = 0.038), PFS (HR: 1.636, 95% CI: 1.021–2.621, P = 0.041), and OS (HR: 2.543, 95% CI: 1.214–5.325, P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: High SUVmax was associated with NPC recurrence. NTR is a potential prognosticator for DMFS, suggesting that heterogeneity in the pretreatment (18)F-FDG uptake between the primary tumor and lymph nodes is associated with high invasion and metastatic potential. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09626-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9069730 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90697302022-05-05 Reflecting on the utility of standardized uptake values on (18)F-FDG PET in nasopharyngeal carcinoma Qiu, Xiufang Wu, Haixia Xu, Ting Xie, Shihan You, Ziqing Hu, Yixin Zheng, Yinghong Liang, Zewei Huang, Chaoxiong Yi, Li Li, Li Liu, Jing Fei, Zhaodong Chen, Chuanben BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: To rethink the clinical significance of standardized uptake values (SUVs) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) on (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 369 NPC patients who underwent pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET. The predictive value of the SUVmax of the primary tumor (SUVmax-t) and regional lymph nodes (SUVmax-n) was evaluated using probability density functions. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine optimal cutoffs for the SUVmax-n/SUVmax-t ratio (NTR). Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to assess survival. RESULTS: The optimal SUVmax-t and SUVmax-n cutoffs were 7.5 and 6.9, respectively. High SUVmax-t and SUVmax-n were related to local and regional recurrence, respectively. Patients with low SUVmax had better 3-year overall survival (OS). To avoid cross-sensitization of cutoff points, we stratified patients with high SUVmax into the low and high NTR groups. The 3-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS; 92.3 vs. 80.6%, P = 0.009), progression-free survival (PFS; 84.0 vs. 67.7%, P = 0.011), and OS (95.9 vs. 89.2%, P = 0.002) significantly differed between the high vs. low NTR groups for patients with high SUVmax. Multivariable analysis showed that NTR was an independent prognostic factor for DMFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.037, 95% CI: 1.039–3.992, P = 0.038), PFS (HR: 1.636, 95% CI: 1.021–2.621, P = 0.041), and OS (HR: 2.543, 95% CI: 1.214–5.325, P = 0.013). CONCLUSION: High SUVmax was associated with NPC recurrence. NTR is a potential prognosticator for DMFS, suggesting that heterogeneity in the pretreatment (18)F-FDG uptake between the primary tumor and lymph nodes is associated with high invasion and metastatic potential. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09626-w. BioMed Central 2022-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9069730/ /pubmed/35513804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09626-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Qiu, Xiufang Wu, Haixia Xu, Ting Xie, Shihan You, Ziqing Hu, Yixin Zheng, Yinghong Liang, Zewei Huang, Chaoxiong Yi, Li Li, Li Liu, Jing Fei, Zhaodong Chen, Chuanben Reflecting on the utility of standardized uptake values on (18)F-FDG PET in nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
title | Reflecting on the utility of standardized uptake values on (18)F-FDG PET in nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
title_full | Reflecting on the utility of standardized uptake values on (18)F-FDG PET in nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
title_fullStr | Reflecting on the utility of standardized uptake values on (18)F-FDG PET in nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Reflecting on the utility of standardized uptake values on (18)F-FDG PET in nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
title_short | Reflecting on the utility of standardized uptake values on (18)F-FDG PET in nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
title_sort | reflecting on the utility of standardized uptake values on (18)f-fdg pet in nasopharyngeal carcinoma |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9069730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09626-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qiuxiufang reflectingontheutilityofstandardizeduptakevalueson18ffdgpetinnasopharyngealcarcinoma AT wuhaixia reflectingontheutilityofstandardizeduptakevalueson18ffdgpetinnasopharyngealcarcinoma AT xuting reflectingontheutilityofstandardizeduptakevalueson18ffdgpetinnasopharyngealcarcinoma AT xieshihan reflectingontheutilityofstandardizeduptakevalueson18ffdgpetinnasopharyngealcarcinoma AT youziqing reflectingontheutilityofstandardizeduptakevalueson18ffdgpetinnasopharyngealcarcinoma AT huyixin reflectingontheutilityofstandardizeduptakevalueson18ffdgpetinnasopharyngealcarcinoma AT zhengyinghong reflectingontheutilityofstandardizeduptakevalueson18ffdgpetinnasopharyngealcarcinoma AT liangzewei reflectingontheutilityofstandardizeduptakevalueson18ffdgpetinnasopharyngealcarcinoma AT huangchaoxiong reflectingontheutilityofstandardizeduptakevalueson18ffdgpetinnasopharyngealcarcinoma AT yili reflectingontheutilityofstandardizeduptakevalueson18ffdgpetinnasopharyngealcarcinoma AT lili reflectingontheutilityofstandardizeduptakevalueson18ffdgpetinnasopharyngealcarcinoma AT liujing reflectingontheutilityofstandardizeduptakevalueson18ffdgpetinnasopharyngealcarcinoma AT feizhaodong reflectingontheutilityofstandardizeduptakevalueson18ffdgpetinnasopharyngealcarcinoma AT chenchuanben reflectingontheutilityofstandardizeduptakevalueson18ffdgpetinnasopharyngealcarcinoma |