Cargando…

The efficacy of vitamin D supplementation for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic gastrointestinal disorder involving gut-brain interactions with limited effective treatment options. Vitamin D deficiency is commonly observed in patients with IBS, but whether vitamin D supplementation ameliorates IBS is controversial in rando...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang, Hangkai, Lu, Linjie, Chen, Yishu, Zeng, Yan, Xu, Chengfu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9069731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-022-00777-x
_version_ 1784700492618661888
author Huang, Hangkai
Lu, Linjie
Chen, Yishu
Zeng, Yan
Xu, Chengfu
author_facet Huang, Hangkai
Lu, Linjie
Chen, Yishu
Zeng, Yan
Xu, Chengfu
author_sort Huang, Hangkai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic gastrointestinal disorder involving gut-brain interactions with limited effective treatment options. Vitamin D deficiency is commonly observed in patients with IBS, but whether vitamin D supplementation ameliorates IBS is controversial in randomized controlled trials. The present systematic review and meta-analysis explored the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in patients with IBS. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of potentially relevant publications from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Studies and the Web of Science up until January 2022. We assessed the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the IBS severity scoring system (IBS-SSS), IBS quality of life (IBS-QoL) and IBS total score (IBS-TS) before and after vitamin D supplementation intervention. RESULTS: We included four randomized, placebo-controlled trials involving 335 participants. The differences in IBS-SSS score between participants in the intervention group and the placebo group increased after intervention (WMD: -55.55, 95% CI: -70.22 to -40.87, I(2) = 53.7%, after intervention; WMD: -3.17, 95% CI: -18.15 to 11.81, I(2) = 0.0%, before intervention). Participants receiving vitamin D supplementation showed greater improvement in IBS-SSS after intervention than participants receiving placebo treatment (WMD: -84.21, 95% CI: -111.38 to -57.05, I(2) = 73.2%; WMD: -28.29, 95% CI: -49.95 to -6.62, I(2) = 46.6%, respectively). Vitamin D supplementation was also superior to placebo in IBS-QoL improvement (WMD: 14.98, 95% CI: 12.06 to 17.90, I(2) = 0.0%; WMD: 6.55, 95% CI: -2.23 to 15.33, I(2) = 82.7%, respectively). Sensitivity analyses revealed an unstable pooled effect on IBS-TS in participants receiving vitamin D supplementation. Therefore, we did not evaluate the efficacy of vitamin D intervention in IBS-TS. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that vitamin D supplementation was superior to placebo for IBS treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12937-022-00777-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9069731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90697312022-05-05 The efficacy of vitamin D supplementation for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis Huang, Hangkai Lu, Linjie Chen, Yishu Zeng, Yan Xu, Chengfu Nutr J Review BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic gastrointestinal disorder involving gut-brain interactions with limited effective treatment options. Vitamin D deficiency is commonly observed in patients with IBS, but whether vitamin D supplementation ameliorates IBS is controversial in randomized controlled trials. The present systematic review and meta-analysis explored the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in patients with IBS. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of potentially relevant publications from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Studies and the Web of Science up until January 2022. We assessed the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of the IBS severity scoring system (IBS-SSS), IBS quality of life (IBS-QoL) and IBS total score (IBS-TS) before and after vitamin D supplementation intervention. RESULTS: We included four randomized, placebo-controlled trials involving 335 participants. The differences in IBS-SSS score between participants in the intervention group and the placebo group increased after intervention (WMD: -55.55, 95% CI: -70.22 to -40.87, I(2) = 53.7%, after intervention; WMD: -3.17, 95% CI: -18.15 to 11.81, I(2) = 0.0%, before intervention). Participants receiving vitamin D supplementation showed greater improvement in IBS-SSS after intervention than participants receiving placebo treatment (WMD: -84.21, 95% CI: -111.38 to -57.05, I(2) = 73.2%; WMD: -28.29, 95% CI: -49.95 to -6.62, I(2) = 46.6%, respectively). Vitamin D supplementation was also superior to placebo in IBS-QoL improvement (WMD: 14.98, 95% CI: 12.06 to 17.90, I(2) = 0.0%; WMD: 6.55, 95% CI: -2.23 to 15.33, I(2) = 82.7%, respectively). Sensitivity analyses revealed an unstable pooled effect on IBS-TS in participants receiving vitamin D supplementation. Therefore, we did not evaluate the efficacy of vitamin D intervention in IBS-TS. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that vitamin D supplementation was superior to placebo for IBS treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12937-022-00777-x. BioMed Central 2022-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9069731/ /pubmed/35509010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-022-00777-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Huang, Hangkai
Lu, Linjie
Chen, Yishu
Zeng, Yan
Xu, Chengfu
The efficacy of vitamin D supplementation for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis
title The efficacy of vitamin D supplementation for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full The efficacy of vitamin D supplementation for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_fullStr The efficacy of vitamin D supplementation for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of vitamin D supplementation for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_short The efficacy of vitamin D supplementation for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy of vitamin d supplementation for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review with meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9069731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35509010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12937-022-00777-x
work_keys_str_mv AT huanghangkai theefficacyofvitamindsupplementationforirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT lulinjie theefficacyofvitamindsupplementationforirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT chenyishu theefficacyofvitamindsupplementationforirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT zengyan theefficacyofvitamindsupplementationforirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT xuchengfu theefficacyofvitamindsupplementationforirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT huanghangkai efficacyofvitamindsupplementationforirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT lulinjie efficacyofvitamindsupplementationforirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT chenyishu efficacyofvitamindsupplementationforirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT zengyan efficacyofvitamindsupplementationforirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT xuchengfu efficacyofvitamindsupplementationforirritablebowelsyndromeasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis