Cargando…
Routine use of indirect calorimetry in critically ill patients: pros and cons
Autores principales: | De Waele, Elisabeth, van Zanten, Arthur R. H. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9069947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04000-5 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Energy expenditure and indirect calorimetry in critical illness and convalescence: current evidence and practical considerations
por: Moonen, Hanneke Pierre Franciscus Xaverius, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Rectal retractor in prostate radiotherapy: pros and cons
por: Ghaffari, Hamed, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Practical guidance for the use of indirect calorimetry during COVID 19 pandemic
por: Singer, Pierre, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in IBD: more pros than cons
por: D’Amico, Ferdinando, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Pros and cons of tetrastarch solution for critically ill patients
por: Toyoda, Daisuke, et al.
Publicado: (2014)