Cargando…

An economic evaluation of implementing a decentralized dengue screening intervention under the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme in Tamil Nadu, South India

BACKGROUND: Lack of effective early screening is a major obstacle for reducing the fatality rate and disease burden of dengue. In light of this, the government of Tamil Nadu has adopted a decentralized dengue screening strategy at the primary healthcare (PHC) facilities using blood platelet count. O...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muniyandi, Malaisamy, Karikalan, Nagarajan, Ravi, Karunya, Sengodan, Senthilkumar, Krishnan, Rajendran, Tyagi, Kirti, Rajsekar, Kavitha, Raju, Sivadhas, Selvavinayagam, T S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9070504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34453836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihab045
_version_ 1784700654296498176
author Muniyandi, Malaisamy
Karikalan, Nagarajan
Ravi, Karunya
Sengodan, Senthilkumar
Krishnan, Rajendran
Tyagi, Kirti
Rajsekar, Kavitha
Raju, Sivadhas
Selvavinayagam, T S
author_facet Muniyandi, Malaisamy
Karikalan, Nagarajan
Ravi, Karunya
Sengodan, Senthilkumar
Krishnan, Rajendran
Tyagi, Kirti
Rajsekar, Kavitha
Raju, Sivadhas
Selvavinayagam, T S
author_sort Muniyandi, Malaisamy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lack of effective early screening is a major obstacle for reducing the fatality rate and disease burden of dengue. In light of this, the government of Tamil Nadu has adopted a decentralized dengue screening strategy at the primary healthcare (PHC) facilities using blood platelet count. Our objective was to determine the cost-effectiveness of a decentralized screening strategy for dengue at PHC facilities compared with the current strategy at the tertiary health facility (THC) level. METHODS: Decision tree analysis followed a hypothetical cohort of 1000 suspected dengue cases entering the model. The cost-effectiveness analysis was performed at a 3% discount rate for the proposed and current strategy. The outcomes are expressed in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per quality-adjusted life years gained. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were done to check the uncertainty in the outcome. RESULTS: The proposed strategy was found to be cost-saving and ICER was estimated to be −41 197. PSA showed that the proposed strategy had a 0.84 probability of being an economically dominant strategy. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed strategy is cost-saving, however, it is recommended to consider optimal population coverage, costs to economic human resources and collateral benefits of equipment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9070504
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90705042022-05-06 An economic evaluation of implementing a decentralized dengue screening intervention under the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme in Tamil Nadu, South India Muniyandi, Malaisamy Karikalan, Nagarajan Ravi, Karunya Sengodan, Senthilkumar Krishnan, Rajendran Tyagi, Kirti Rajsekar, Kavitha Raju, Sivadhas Selvavinayagam, T S Int Health Original Article BACKGROUND: Lack of effective early screening is a major obstacle for reducing the fatality rate and disease burden of dengue. In light of this, the government of Tamil Nadu has adopted a decentralized dengue screening strategy at the primary healthcare (PHC) facilities using blood platelet count. Our objective was to determine the cost-effectiveness of a decentralized screening strategy for dengue at PHC facilities compared with the current strategy at the tertiary health facility (THC) level. METHODS: Decision tree analysis followed a hypothetical cohort of 1000 suspected dengue cases entering the model. The cost-effectiveness analysis was performed at a 3% discount rate for the proposed and current strategy. The outcomes are expressed in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per quality-adjusted life years gained. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were done to check the uncertainty in the outcome. RESULTS: The proposed strategy was found to be cost-saving and ICER was estimated to be −41 197. PSA showed that the proposed strategy had a 0.84 probability of being an economically dominant strategy. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed strategy is cost-saving, however, it is recommended to consider optimal population coverage, costs to economic human resources and collateral benefits of equipment. Oxford University Press 2021-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9070504/ /pubmed/34453836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihab045 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Muniyandi, Malaisamy
Karikalan, Nagarajan
Ravi, Karunya
Sengodan, Senthilkumar
Krishnan, Rajendran
Tyagi, Kirti
Rajsekar, Kavitha
Raju, Sivadhas
Selvavinayagam, T S
An economic evaluation of implementing a decentralized dengue screening intervention under the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme in Tamil Nadu, South India
title An economic evaluation of implementing a decentralized dengue screening intervention under the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme in Tamil Nadu, South India
title_full An economic evaluation of implementing a decentralized dengue screening intervention under the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme in Tamil Nadu, South India
title_fullStr An economic evaluation of implementing a decentralized dengue screening intervention under the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme in Tamil Nadu, South India
title_full_unstemmed An economic evaluation of implementing a decentralized dengue screening intervention under the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme in Tamil Nadu, South India
title_short An economic evaluation of implementing a decentralized dengue screening intervention under the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme in Tamil Nadu, South India
title_sort economic evaluation of implementing a decentralized dengue screening intervention under the national vector borne disease control programme in tamil nadu, south india
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9070504/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34453836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/inthealth/ihab045
work_keys_str_mv AT muniyandimalaisamy aneconomicevaluationofimplementingadecentralizeddenguescreeninginterventionunderthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogrammeintamilnadusouthindia
AT karikalannagarajan aneconomicevaluationofimplementingadecentralizeddenguescreeninginterventionunderthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogrammeintamilnadusouthindia
AT ravikarunya aneconomicevaluationofimplementingadecentralizeddenguescreeninginterventionunderthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogrammeintamilnadusouthindia
AT sengodansenthilkumar aneconomicevaluationofimplementingadecentralizeddenguescreeninginterventionunderthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogrammeintamilnadusouthindia
AT krishnanrajendran aneconomicevaluationofimplementingadecentralizeddenguescreeninginterventionunderthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogrammeintamilnadusouthindia
AT tyagikirti aneconomicevaluationofimplementingadecentralizeddenguescreeninginterventionunderthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogrammeintamilnadusouthindia
AT rajsekarkavitha aneconomicevaluationofimplementingadecentralizeddenguescreeninginterventionunderthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogrammeintamilnadusouthindia
AT rajusivadhas aneconomicevaluationofimplementingadecentralizeddenguescreeninginterventionunderthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogrammeintamilnadusouthindia
AT selvavinayagamts aneconomicevaluationofimplementingadecentralizeddenguescreeninginterventionunderthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogrammeintamilnadusouthindia
AT muniyandimalaisamy economicevaluationofimplementingadecentralizeddenguescreeninginterventionunderthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogrammeintamilnadusouthindia
AT karikalannagarajan economicevaluationofimplementingadecentralizeddenguescreeninginterventionunderthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogrammeintamilnadusouthindia
AT ravikarunya economicevaluationofimplementingadecentralizeddenguescreeninginterventionunderthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogrammeintamilnadusouthindia
AT sengodansenthilkumar economicevaluationofimplementingadecentralizeddenguescreeninginterventionunderthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogrammeintamilnadusouthindia
AT krishnanrajendran economicevaluationofimplementingadecentralizeddenguescreeninginterventionunderthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogrammeintamilnadusouthindia
AT tyagikirti economicevaluationofimplementingadecentralizeddenguescreeninginterventionunderthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogrammeintamilnadusouthindia
AT rajsekarkavitha economicevaluationofimplementingadecentralizeddenguescreeninginterventionunderthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogrammeintamilnadusouthindia
AT rajusivadhas economicevaluationofimplementingadecentralizeddenguescreeninginterventionunderthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogrammeintamilnadusouthindia
AT selvavinayagamts economicevaluationofimplementingadecentralizeddenguescreeninginterventionunderthenationalvectorbornediseasecontrolprogrammeintamilnadusouthindia