Cargando…
Do multiple experimenters improve the reproducibility of animal studies?
The credibility of scientific research has been seriously questioned by the widely claimed “reproducibility crisis”. In light of this crisis, there is a growing awareness that the rigorous standardisation of experimental conditions may contribute to poor reproducibility of animal studies. Instead, s...
Autores principales: | von Kortzfleisch, Vanessa Tabea, Ambrée, Oliver, Karp, Natasha A., Meyer, Neele, Novak, Janja, Palme, Rupert, Rosso, Marianna, Touma, Chadi, Würbel, Hanno, Kaiser, Sylvia, Sachser, Norbert, Richter, S. Helene |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9070896/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35511779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001564 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Correction: Do multiple experimenters improve the reproducibility of animal studies?
por: von Kortzfleisch, Vanessa Tabea, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Improving reproducibility in animal research by splitting the study population into several ‘mini-experiments’
por: von Kortzfleisch, Vanessa Tabea, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The rearing environment persistently modulates mouse phenotypes from the molecular to the behavioural level
por: Jaric, Ivana, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Heterogenising study samples across testing time improves reproducibility of behavioural data
por: Bodden, Carina, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Handling method affects measures of anxiety, but not chronic stress in mice
por: Novak, Janja, et al.
Publicado: (2022)