Cargando…

Advanced clinical prioritisation in an Irish, tertiary, chronic pain management service: an audit of outcomes

BACKGROUND: Advanced clinical prioritisation (ACP) pathways could potentially improve the interface between primary and secondary care, instigating appropriate treatment pathways with improved efficiencies. Telemedicine is a key component of ACP pathways. AIMS: Telephone consultations for new referr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Purcell, Andrew, O’Shea, Deirdre, Power, Camillus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9070966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-022-03022-w
_version_ 1784700746737909760
author Purcell, Andrew
O’Shea, Deirdre
Power, Camillus
author_facet Purcell, Andrew
O’Shea, Deirdre
Power, Camillus
author_sort Purcell, Andrew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Advanced clinical prioritisation (ACP) pathways could potentially improve the interface between primary and secondary care, instigating appropriate treatment pathways with improved efficiencies. Telemedicine is a key component of ACP pathways. AIMS: Telephone consultations for new referrals (as part of a pilot ACP pathway for chronic pain) were trialled to try (a) improve efficiency of outpatient clinics, (b) expedite assessment/treatment, and (c) reduce the number of face-to-face attendances. An audit of this activity was undertaken. METHODS: The 100 longest waiting new referrals were identified. Over a 9-month period patients were contacted via telephone, undergoing an initial assessment. Treatment plans were initiated and outcomes (≥ 1) were documented. RESULTS: Average length of time on waiting list was 35.37 months. 40% patients were discharged with advice back to referrer, 8% were referred for diagnostics/imaging, 32% were offered pharmacological management, 30% were scheduled for interventional management, 9% were referred for further MDT assessment/treatment, 4% were referred directly for a pain management programme (PMP), 6% were referred for assessment by other specialist services, 9% were brought in for face-to-face consultation in our pain management OPD, 2% were uncontactable, and 1% had died before assessment could be made. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine as part of ACP represents an opportunity to improve speed of access to care, reducing the number of patients and time spent on waiting lists. Future studies should be directed at assessing efficacy of treatment plans initiated in telemedicine clinics whilst also looking at cost effectiveness and patient satisfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9070966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90709662022-05-06 Advanced clinical prioritisation in an Irish, tertiary, chronic pain management service: an audit of outcomes Purcell, Andrew O’Shea, Deirdre Power, Camillus Ir J Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Advanced clinical prioritisation (ACP) pathways could potentially improve the interface between primary and secondary care, instigating appropriate treatment pathways with improved efficiencies. Telemedicine is a key component of ACP pathways. AIMS: Telephone consultations for new referrals (as part of a pilot ACP pathway for chronic pain) were trialled to try (a) improve efficiency of outpatient clinics, (b) expedite assessment/treatment, and (c) reduce the number of face-to-face attendances. An audit of this activity was undertaken. METHODS: The 100 longest waiting new referrals were identified. Over a 9-month period patients were contacted via telephone, undergoing an initial assessment. Treatment plans were initiated and outcomes (≥ 1) were documented. RESULTS: Average length of time on waiting list was 35.37 months. 40% patients were discharged with advice back to referrer, 8% were referred for diagnostics/imaging, 32% were offered pharmacological management, 30% were scheduled for interventional management, 9% were referred for further MDT assessment/treatment, 4% were referred directly for a pain management programme (PMP), 6% were referred for assessment by other specialist services, 9% were brought in for face-to-face consultation in our pain management OPD, 2% were uncontactable, and 1% had died before assessment could be made. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine as part of ACP represents an opportunity to improve speed of access to care, reducing the number of patients and time spent on waiting lists. Future studies should be directed at assessing efficacy of treatment plans initiated in telemedicine clinics whilst also looking at cost effectiveness and patient satisfaction. Springer International Publishing 2022-05-05 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9070966/ /pubmed/35513736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-022-03022-w Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Article
Purcell, Andrew
O’Shea, Deirdre
Power, Camillus
Advanced clinical prioritisation in an Irish, tertiary, chronic pain management service: an audit of outcomes
title Advanced clinical prioritisation in an Irish, tertiary, chronic pain management service: an audit of outcomes
title_full Advanced clinical prioritisation in an Irish, tertiary, chronic pain management service: an audit of outcomes
title_fullStr Advanced clinical prioritisation in an Irish, tertiary, chronic pain management service: an audit of outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Advanced clinical prioritisation in an Irish, tertiary, chronic pain management service: an audit of outcomes
title_short Advanced clinical prioritisation in an Irish, tertiary, chronic pain management service: an audit of outcomes
title_sort advanced clinical prioritisation in an irish, tertiary, chronic pain management service: an audit of outcomes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9070966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513736
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-022-03022-w
work_keys_str_mv AT purcellandrew advancedclinicalprioritisationinanirishtertiarychronicpainmanagementserviceanauditofoutcomes
AT osheadeirdre advancedclinicalprioritisationinanirishtertiarychronicpainmanagementserviceanauditofoutcomes
AT powercamillus advancedclinicalprioritisationinanirishtertiarychronicpainmanagementserviceanauditofoutcomes