Cargando…
Dendrite formation in Li-metal anodes: an atomistic molecular dynamics study
Lithium-metal is a desired material for anodes of Li-ion and beyond Li-ion batteries because of its large theoretical specific capacity of 3860 mA h g(−1) (the highest known so far), low density, and extremely low potential. Unfortunately, there are several problems that restrict the practical appli...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society of Chemistry
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9071028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35530483 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c9ra05067a |
Sumario: | Lithium-metal is a desired material for anodes of Li-ion and beyond Li-ion batteries because of its large theoretical specific capacity of 3860 mA h g(−1) (the highest known so far), low density, and extremely low potential. Unfortunately, there are several problems that restrict the practical application of lithium-metal anodes, such as the formation of dendrites and reactivity with electrolytes. We present here a study of lithium dendrite formation on a Li-metal anode covered by a cracked solid electrolyte interface (SEI) of LiF in contact with a typical liquid electrolyte composed of 1 M LiPF(6) salt solvated in ethylene carbonate. The study uses classical molecular dynamics on a model nanobattery. We tested three ways to charge the nanobattery: (1) constant current at a rate of one Li(+) per 0.4 ps, (2) pulse train 10 Li(+) per 4 ps, and (3) constant number ions in the electrolyte: one Li(+) enters the electrolyte from the cathode as one Li(+) exits the electrolyte to the anode. We found that although the SEI does not interfere with the lithiation, the mere presence of a crack in the SEI boosts and guides dendrite formation at temperatures between 325 K and 410.7 K at any C-rate, being more favorable at 325 K than at 410.7 K. On the other hand, we find that a higher C-rate (2.2C) favors the lithium dendrite formation compared to a lower C-rate (1.6C). Thus the battery could store more energy in a safe way at a lower C-rate. |
---|