Cargando…

Q waves are the strongest electrocardiographic variable associated with primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator benefit: a prospective multicentre study

AIM: The association of standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) markers with benefits of the primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has not been determined in the contemporary era. We analysed traditional and novel ECG variables in a large prospective, controlled primary...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pelli, Ari, Junttila, M Juhani, Kenttä, Tuomas V, Schlögl, Simon, Zabel, Markus, Malik, Marek, Reichlin, Tobias, Willems, Rik, Vos, Marc A, Harden, Markus, Friede, Tim, Sticherling, Christian, Huikuri, Heikki V
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9071070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34849744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euab260
_version_ 1784700770362327040
author Pelli, Ari
Junttila, M Juhani
Kenttä, Tuomas V
Schlögl, Simon
Zabel, Markus
Malik, Marek
Reichlin, Tobias
Willems, Rik
Vos, Marc A
Harden, Markus
Friede, Tim
Sticherling, Christian
Huikuri, Heikki V
author_facet Pelli, Ari
Junttila, M Juhani
Kenttä, Tuomas V
Schlögl, Simon
Zabel, Markus
Malik, Marek
Reichlin, Tobias
Willems, Rik
Vos, Marc A
Harden, Markus
Friede, Tim
Sticherling, Christian
Huikuri, Heikki V
author_sort Pelli, Ari
collection PubMed
description AIM: The association of standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) markers with benefits of the primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has not been determined in the contemporary era. We analysed traditional and novel ECG variables in a large prospective, controlled primary prophylactic ICD population to assess the predictive value of ECG in terms of ICD benefit. METHODS AND RESULTS: Electrocardiograms from 1477 ICD patients and 700 control patients (EU-CERT-ICD; non-randomized, controlled, prospective multicentre study; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02064192), who met ICD implantation criteria but did not receive the device, were analysed. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. In ICD patients, the co-primary outcome of first appropriate shock was used. Mean follow-up time was 2.4 ± 1.1 years to death and 2.3 ± 1.2 years to the first appropriate shock. Pathological Q waves were associated with decreased mortality in ICD patients [hazard ratio (HR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35–0.84; P < 0.01] and patients with pathological Q waves had significantly more benefit from ICD (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21–0.93; P = 0.03). QTc interval increase taken as a continuous variable was associated with both mortality and appropriate shock incidence, but commonly used cut-off values, were not statistically significantly associated with either of the outcomes. CONCLUSION: Pathological Q waves were a strong ECG predictor of ICD benefit in primary prophylactic ICD patients. Excess mortality among Q wave patients seems to be due to arrhythmic death which can be prevented by ICD.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9071070
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90710702022-05-06 Q waves are the strongest electrocardiographic variable associated with primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator benefit: a prospective multicentre study Pelli, Ari Junttila, M Juhani Kenttä, Tuomas V Schlögl, Simon Zabel, Markus Malik, Marek Reichlin, Tobias Willems, Rik Vos, Marc A Harden, Markus Friede, Tim Sticherling, Christian Huikuri, Heikki V Europace Clinical Research AIM: The association of standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) markers with benefits of the primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has not been determined in the contemporary era. We analysed traditional and novel ECG variables in a large prospective, controlled primary prophylactic ICD population to assess the predictive value of ECG in terms of ICD benefit. METHODS AND RESULTS: Electrocardiograms from 1477 ICD patients and 700 control patients (EU-CERT-ICD; non-randomized, controlled, prospective multicentre study; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02064192), who met ICD implantation criteria but did not receive the device, were analysed. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. In ICD patients, the co-primary outcome of first appropriate shock was used. Mean follow-up time was 2.4 ± 1.1 years to death and 2.3 ± 1.2 years to the first appropriate shock. Pathological Q waves were associated with decreased mortality in ICD patients [hazard ratio (HR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35–0.84; P < 0.01] and patients with pathological Q waves had significantly more benefit from ICD (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21–0.93; P = 0.03). QTc interval increase taken as a continuous variable was associated with both mortality and appropriate shock incidence, but commonly used cut-off values, were not statistically significantly associated with either of the outcomes. CONCLUSION: Pathological Q waves were a strong ECG predictor of ICD benefit in primary prophylactic ICD patients. Excess mortality among Q wave patients seems to be due to arrhythmic death which can be prevented by ICD. Oxford University Press 2021-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9071070/ /pubmed/34849744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euab260 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Pelli, Ari
Junttila, M Juhani
Kenttä, Tuomas V
Schlögl, Simon
Zabel, Markus
Malik, Marek
Reichlin, Tobias
Willems, Rik
Vos, Marc A
Harden, Markus
Friede, Tim
Sticherling, Christian
Huikuri, Heikki V
Q waves are the strongest electrocardiographic variable associated with primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator benefit: a prospective multicentre study
title Q waves are the strongest electrocardiographic variable associated with primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator benefit: a prospective multicentre study
title_full Q waves are the strongest electrocardiographic variable associated with primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator benefit: a prospective multicentre study
title_fullStr Q waves are the strongest electrocardiographic variable associated with primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator benefit: a prospective multicentre study
title_full_unstemmed Q waves are the strongest electrocardiographic variable associated with primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator benefit: a prospective multicentre study
title_short Q waves are the strongest electrocardiographic variable associated with primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator benefit: a prospective multicentre study
title_sort q waves are the strongest electrocardiographic variable associated with primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator benefit: a prospective multicentre study
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9071070/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34849744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euab260
work_keys_str_mv AT pelliari qwavesarethestrongestelectrocardiographicvariableassociatedwithprimaryprophylacticimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorbenefitaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT junttilamjuhani qwavesarethestrongestelectrocardiographicvariableassociatedwithprimaryprophylacticimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorbenefitaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT kenttatuomasv qwavesarethestrongestelectrocardiographicvariableassociatedwithprimaryprophylacticimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorbenefitaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT schloglsimon qwavesarethestrongestelectrocardiographicvariableassociatedwithprimaryprophylacticimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorbenefitaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT zabelmarkus qwavesarethestrongestelectrocardiographicvariableassociatedwithprimaryprophylacticimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorbenefitaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT malikmarek qwavesarethestrongestelectrocardiographicvariableassociatedwithprimaryprophylacticimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorbenefitaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT reichlintobias qwavesarethestrongestelectrocardiographicvariableassociatedwithprimaryprophylacticimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorbenefitaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT willemsrik qwavesarethestrongestelectrocardiographicvariableassociatedwithprimaryprophylacticimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorbenefitaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT vosmarca qwavesarethestrongestelectrocardiographicvariableassociatedwithprimaryprophylacticimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorbenefitaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT hardenmarkus qwavesarethestrongestelectrocardiographicvariableassociatedwithprimaryprophylacticimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorbenefitaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT friedetim qwavesarethestrongestelectrocardiographicvariableassociatedwithprimaryprophylacticimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorbenefitaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT sticherlingchristian qwavesarethestrongestelectrocardiographicvariableassociatedwithprimaryprophylacticimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorbenefitaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT huikuriheikkiv qwavesarethestrongestelectrocardiographicvariableassociatedwithprimaryprophylacticimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorbenefitaprospectivemulticentrestudy
AT qwavesarethestrongestelectrocardiographicvariableassociatedwithprimaryprophylacticimplantablecardioverterdefibrillatorbenefitaprospectivemulticentrestudy