Cargando…
A retrospective 5-year review of rubella in South Africa prior to the introduction of a rubella-containing vaccine
South Africa has yet to introduce a rubella-containing vaccine (RCV) into its Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI). Here we evaluated the incidence of laboratory-confirmed rubella and congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) cases over the years 2015 to 2019, to document the epidemiology of rubella and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9071131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35512030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265870 |
_version_ | 1784700784402759680 |
---|---|
author | Hong, Heather Malfeld, Susan Smit, Sheilagh Makhathini, Lillian Fortuin, Mirriam Motsamai, Tshepo Tselana, Dipolelo Manamela, Morubula Jack Motaze, Nkengafac Villyen Ntshoe, Genevie Kamupira, Mercy Khosa-Lesola, Ester Mokoena, Sibongile Buthelezi, Thulasizwe Maseti, Elizabeth Suchard, Melinda |
author_facet | Hong, Heather Malfeld, Susan Smit, Sheilagh Makhathini, Lillian Fortuin, Mirriam Motsamai, Tshepo Tselana, Dipolelo Manamela, Morubula Jack Motaze, Nkengafac Villyen Ntshoe, Genevie Kamupira, Mercy Khosa-Lesola, Ester Mokoena, Sibongile Buthelezi, Thulasizwe Maseti, Elizabeth Suchard, Melinda |
author_sort | Hong, Heather |
collection | PubMed |
description | South Africa has yet to introduce a rubella-containing vaccine (RCV) into its Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI). Here we evaluated the incidence of laboratory-confirmed rubella and congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) cases over the years 2015 to 2019, to document the epidemiology of rubella and CRS within South Africa prior to a RCV introduction. This retrospective study evaluated the number of laboratory-confirmed rubella cases reported through the national febrile rash surveillance system. A positive test for rubella immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies was considered a confirmed rubella case. For CRS cases, we reported laboratory-confirmed CRS cases collected from 28 sentinel-sites from all nine provinces of South Africa. From 2015–2019, 19 773 serum samples were tested for rubella IgM antibodies, 6 643 (33.6%) were confirmed rubella cases. Rubella was seasonal, with peaks in spring (September to November). Case numbers were similar between males (n = 3 239; 50.1%) and females (n = 3 232; 49.9%). The highest burden of cases occurred in 2017 (n = 2 526; 38%). The median age was 5 years (IQR: 3–7 years). Importantly, of females with rubella, 5.0% (161 of 3 232) of the cases were among women of reproductive age (15–44 years). A total of 62 CRS cases were reported, the mortality rate was 12.9% (n = 8), and the most common birth defect was congenital heart disease. In conclusion, rubella is endemic in South Africa. Children below the age of 10 years were the most affected, however, rubella was also reported among women of reproductive age. The baseline data represented here provides insight into the burden of rubella and CRS in South Africa prior to the introduction of a RCV, and can enable planning of RCV introduction into the South African EPI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9071131 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90711312022-05-06 A retrospective 5-year review of rubella in South Africa prior to the introduction of a rubella-containing vaccine Hong, Heather Malfeld, Susan Smit, Sheilagh Makhathini, Lillian Fortuin, Mirriam Motsamai, Tshepo Tselana, Dipolelo Manamela, Morubula Jack Motaze, Nkengafac Villyen Ntshoe, Genevie Kamupira, Mercy Khosa-Lesola, Ester Mokoena, Sibongile Buthelezi, Thulasizwe Maseti, Elizabeth Suchard, Melinda PLoS One Research Article South Africa has yet to introduce a rubella-containing vaccine (RCV) into its Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI). Here we evaluated the incidence of laboratory-confirmed rubella and congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) cases over the years 2015 to 2019, to document the epidemiology of rubella and CRS within South Africa prior to a RCV introduction. This retrospective study evaluated the number of laboratory-confirmed rubella cases reported through the national febrile rash surveillance system. A positive test for rubella immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies was considered a confirmed rubella case. For CRS cases, we reported laboratory-confirmed CRS cases collected from 28 sentinel-sites from all nine provinces of South Africa. From 2015–2019, 19 773 serum samples were tested for rubella IgM antibodies, 6 643 (33.6%) were confirmed rubella cases. Rubella was seasonal, with peaks in spring (September to November). Case numbers were similar between males (n = 3 239; 50.1%) and females (n = 3 232; 49.9%). The highest burden of cases occurred in 2017 (n = 2 526; 38%). The median age was 5 years (IQR: 3–7 years). Importantly, of females with rubella, 5.0% (161 of 3 232) of the cases were among women of reproductive age (15–44 years). A total of 62 CRS cases were reported, the mortality rate was 12.9% (n = 8), and the most common birth defect was congenital heart disease. In conclusion, rubella is endemic in South Africa. Children below the age of 10 years were the most affected, however, rubella was also reported among women of reproductive age. The baseline data represented here provides insight into the burden of rubella and CRS in South Africa prior to the introduction of a RCV, and can enable planning of RCV introduction into the South African EPI. Public Library of Science 2022-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9071131/ /pubmed/35512030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265870 Text en © 2022 Hong et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hong, Heather Malfeld, Susan Smit, Sheilagh Makhathini, Lillian Fortuin, Mirriam Motsamai, Tshepo Tselana, Dipolelo Manamela, Morubula Jack Motaze, Nkengafac Villyen Ntshoe, Genevie Kamupira, Mercy Khosa-Lesola, Ester Mokoena, Sibongile Buthelezi, Thulasizwe Maseti, Elizabeth Suchard, Melinda A retrospective 5-year review of rubella in South Africa prior to the introduction of a rubella-containing vaccine |
title | A retrospective 5-year review of rubella in South Africa prior to the introduction of a rubella-containing vaccine |
title_full | A retrospective 5-year review of rubella in South Africa prior to the introduction of a rubella-containing vaccine |
title_fullStr | A retrospective 5-year review of rubella in South Africa prior to the introduction of a rubella-containing vaccine |
title_full_unstemmed | A retrospective 5-year review of rubella in South Africa prior to the introduction of a rubella-containing vaccine |
title_short | A retrospective 5-year review of rubella in South Africa prior to the introduction of a rubella-containing vaccine |
title_sort | retrospective 5-year review of rubella in south africa prior to the introduction of a rubella-containing vaccine |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9071131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35512030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265870 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hongheather aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT malfeldsusan aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT smitsheilagh aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT makhathinilillian aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT fortuinmirriam aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT motsamaitshepo aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT tselanadipolelo aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT manamelamorubulajack aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT motazenkengafacvillyen aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT ntshoegenevie aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT kamupiramercy aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT khosalesolaester aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT mokoenasibongile aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT buthelezithulasizwe aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT masetielizabeth aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT suchardmelinda aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT hongheather retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT malfeldsusan retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT smitsheilagh retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT makhathinilillian retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT fortuinmirriam retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT motsamaitshepo retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT tselanadipolelo retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT manamelamorubulajack retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT motazenkengafacvillyen retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT ntshoegenevie retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT kamupiramercy retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT khosalesolaester retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT mokoenasibongile retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT buthelezithulasizwe retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT masetielizabeth retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine AT suchardmelinda retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine |