Cargando…

A retrospective 5-year review of rubella in South Africa prior to the introduction of a rubella-containing vaccine

South Africa has yet to introduce a rubella-containing vaccine (RCV) into its Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI). Here we evaluated the incidence of laboratory-confirmed rubella and congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) cases over the years 2015 to 2019, to document the epidemiology of rubella and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Heather, Malfeld, Susan, Smit, Sheilagh, Makhathini, Lillian, Fortuin, Mirriam, Motsamai, Tshepo, Tselana, Dipolelo, Manamela, Morubula Jack, Motaze, Nkengafac Villyen, Ntshoe, Genevie, Kamupira, Mercy, Khosa-Lesola, Ester, Mokoena, Sibongile, Buthelezi, Thulasizwe, Maseti, Elizabeth, Suchard, Melinda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9071131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35512030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265870
_version_ 1784700784402759680
author Hong, Heather
Malfeld, Susan
Smit, Sheilagh
Makhathini, Lillian
Fortuin, Mirriam
Motsamai, Tshepo
Tselana, Dipolelo
Manamela, Morubula Jack
Motaze, Nkengafac Villyen
Ntshoe, Genevie
Kamupira, Mercy
Khosa-Lesola, Ester
Mokoena, Sibongile
Buthelezi, Thulasizwe
Maseti, Elizabeth
Suchard, Melinda
author_facet Hong, Heather
Malfeld, Susan
Smit, Sheilagh
Makhathini, Lillian
Fortuin, Mirriam
Motsamai, Tshepo
Tselana, Dipolelo
Manamela, Morubula Jack
Motaze, Nkengafac Villyen
Ntshoe, Genevie
Kamupira, Mercy
Khosa-Lesola, Ester
Mokoena, Sibongile
Buthelezi, Thulasizwe
Maseti, Elizabeth
Suchard, Melinda
author_sort Hong, Heather
collection PubMed
description South Africa has yet to introduce a rubella-containing vaccine (RCV) into its Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI). Here we evaluated the incidence of laboratory-confirmed rubella and congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) cases over the years 2015 to 2019, to document the epidemiology of rubella and CRS within South Africa prior to a RCV introduction. This retrospective study evaluated the number of laboratory-confirmed rubella cases reported through the national febrile rash surveillance system. A positive test for rubella immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies was considered a confirmed rubella case. For CRS cases, we reported laboratory-confirmed CRS cases collected from 28 sentinel-sites from all nine provinces of South Africa. From 2015–2019, 19 773 serum samples were tested for rubella IgM antibodies, 6 643 (33.6%) were confirmed rubella cases. Rubella was seasonal, with peaks in spring (September to November). Case numbers were similar between males (n = 3 239; 50.1%) and females (n = 3 232; 49.9%). The highest burden of cases occurred in 2017 (n = 2 526; 38%). The median age was 5 years (IQR: 3–7 years). Importantly, of females with rubella, 5.0% (161 of 3 232) of the cases were among women of reproductive age (15–44 years). A total of 62 CRS cases were reported, the mortality rate was 12.9% (n = 8), and the most common birth defect was congenital heart disease. In conclusion, rubella is endemic in South Africa. Children below the age of 10 years were the most affected, however, rubella was also reported among women of reproductive age. The baseline data represented here provides insight into the burden of rubella and CRS in South Africa prior to the introduction of a RCV, and can enable planning of RCV introduction into the South African EPI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9071131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90711312022-05-06 A retrospective 5-year review of rubella in South Africa prior to the introduction of a rubella-containing vaccine Hong, Heather Malfeld, Susan Smit, Sheilagh Makhathini, Lillian Fortuin, Mirriam Motsamai, Tshepo Tselana, Dipolelo Manamela, Morubula Jack Motaze, Nkengafac Villyen Ntshoe, Genevie Kamupira, Mercy Khosa-Lesola, Ester Mokoena, Sibongile Buthelezi, Thulasizwe Maseti, Elizabeth Suchard, Melinda PLoS One Research Article South Africa has yet to introduce a rubella-containing vaccine (RCV) into its Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI). Here we evaluated the incidence of laboratory-confirmed rubella and congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) cases over the years 2015 to 2019, to document the epidemiology of rubella and CRS within South Africa prior to a RCV introduction. This retrospective study evaluated the number of laboratory-confirmed rubella cases reported through the national febrile rash surveillance system. A positive test for rubella immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies was considered a confirmed rubella case. For CRS cases, we reported laboratory-confirmed CRS cases collected from 28 sentinel-sites from all nine provinces of South Africa. From 2015–2019, 19 773 serum samples were tested for rubella IgM antibodies, 6 643 (33.6%) were confirmed rubella cases. Rubella was seasonal, with peaks in spring (September to November). Case numbers were similar between males (n = 3 239; 50.1%) and females (n = 3 232; 49.9%). The highest burden of cases occurred in 2017 (n = 2 526; 38%). The median age was 5 years (IQR: 3–7 years). Importantly, of females with rubella, 5.0% (161 of 3 232) of the cases were among women of reproductive age (15–44 years). A total of 62 CRS cases were reported, the mortality rate was 12.9% (n = 8), and the most common birth defect was congenital heart disease. In conclusion, rubella is endemic in South Africa. Children below the age of 10 years were the most affected, however, rubella was also reported among women of reproductive age. The baseline data represented here provides insight into the burden of rubella and CRS in South Africa prior to the introduction of a RCV, and can enable planning of RCV introduction into the South African EPI. Public Library of Science 2022-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9071131/ /pubmed/35512030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265870 Text en © 2022 Hong et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hong, Heather
Malfeld, Susan
Smit, Sheilagh
Makhathini, Lillian
Fortuin, Mirriam
Motsamai, Tshepo
Tselana, Dipolelo
Manamela, Morubula Jack
Motaze, Nkengafac Villyen
Ntshoe, Genevie
Kamupira, Mercy
Khosa-Lesola, Ester
Mokoena, Sibongile
Buthelezi, Thulasizwe
Maseti, Elizabeth
Suchard, Melinda
A retrospective 5-year review of rubella in South Africa prior to the introduction of a rubella-containing vaccine
title A retrospective 5-year review of rubella in South Africa prior to the introduction of a rubella-containing vaccine
title_full A retrospective 5-year review of rubella in South Africa prior to the introduction of a rubella-containing vaccine
title_fullStr A retrospective 5-year review of rubella in South Africa prior to the introduction of a rubella-containing vaccine
title_full_unstemmed A retrospective 5-year review of rubella in South Africa prior to the introduction of a rubella-containing vaccine
title_short A retrospective 5-year review of rubella in South Africa prior to the introduction of a rubella-containing vaccine
title_sort retrospective 5-year review of rubella in south africa prior to the introduction of a rubella-containing vaccine
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9071131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35512030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265870
work_keys_str_mv AT hongheather aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT malfeldsusan aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT smitsheilagh aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT makhathinilillian aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT fortuinmirriam aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT motsamaitshepo aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT tselanadipolelo aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT manamelamorubulajack aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT motazenkengafacvillyen aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT ntshoegenevie aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT kamupiramercy aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT khosalesolaester aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT mokoenasibongile aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT buthelezithulasizwe aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT masetielizabeth aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT suchardmelinda aretrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT hongheather retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT malfeldsusan retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT smitsheilagh retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT makhathinilillian retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT fortuinmirriam retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT motsamaitshepo retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT tselanadipolelo retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT manamelamorubulajack retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT motazenkengafacvillyen retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT ntshoegenevie retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT kamupiramercy retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT khosalesolaester retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT mokoenasibongile retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT buthelezithulasizwe retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT masetielizabeth retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine
AT suchardmelinda retrospective5yearreviewofrubellainsouthafricapriortotheintroductionofarubellacontainingvaccine