Cargando…

Infection intensity-dependent accuracy of reagent strip for the diagnosis of Schistosoma haematobium and estimation of treatment prevalence thresholds

BACKGROUND: Reagent strip to detect microhematuria as a proxy for Schistosoma haematobium infections has been considered an alternative to urine filtration for individual diagnosis and community-based estimates of treatment needs for preventive chemotherapy. However, the diagnostic accuracy of reage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grolimund, Carla M., Bärenbold, Oliver, Hatz, Christoph F., Vennervald, Birgitte J., Mayombana, Charles, Mshinda, Hassan, Utzinger, Jürg, Vounatsou, Penelope
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9071146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010332
_version_ 1784700788146176000
author Grolimund, Carla M.
Bärenbold, Oliver
Hatz, Christoph F.
Vennervald, Birgitte J.
Mayombana, Charles
Mshinda, Hassan
Utzinger, Jürg
Vounatsou, Penelope
author_facet Grolimund, Carla M.
Bärenbold, Oliver
Hatz, Christoph F.
Vennervald, Birgitte J.
Mayombana, Charles
Mshinda, Hassan
Utzinger, Jürg
Vounatsou, Penelope
author_sort Grolimund, Carla M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reagent strip to detect microhematuria as a proxy for Schistosoma haematobium infections has been considered an alternative to urine filtration for individual diagnosis and community-based estimates of treatment needs for preventive chemotherapy. However, the diagnostic accuracy of reagent strip needs further investigation, particularly at low infection intensity levels. METHODS: We used existing data from a study conducted in Tanzania that employed urine filtration and reagent strip testing for S. haematobium in two villages, including a baseline and six follow-up surveys after praziquantel treatment representing a wide range of infection prevalence. We developed a Bayesian model linking individual S. haematobium egg count data based on urine filtration to reagent strip binary test results available on multiple days and estimated the relation between infection intensity and sensitivity of reagent strip. Furthermore, we simulated data from 3,000 hypothetical populations with varying mean infection intensity to infer on the relation between prevalence observed by urine filtration and the interpretation of reagent strip readings. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Reagent strip showed excellent sensitivity even for single measurement reaching 100% at around 15 eggs of S. haematobium per 10 ml of urine when traces on reagent strip were considered positive. The corresponding specificity was 97%. When traces were considered negative, the diagnostic accuracy of the reagent strip was equivalent to urine filtration data obtained on a single day. A 10% and 50% urine filtration prevalence based on a single day sampling corresponds to 11.2% and 48.6% prevalence by reagent strip, respectively, when traces were considered negative, and 17.6% and 57.7%, respectively, when traces were considered positive. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Trace results should be included in reagent strip readings when high sensitivity is required, but excluded when high specificity is needed. The observed prevalence of reagent strip results, when traces are considered negative, is a good proxy for prevalence estimates of S. haematobium infection by urine filtration on a single day.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9071146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90711462022-05-06 Infection intensity-dependent accuracy of reagent strip for the diagnosis of Schistosoma haematobium and estimation of treatment prevalence thresholds Grolimund, Carla M. Bärenbold, Oliver Hatz, Christoph F. Vennervald, Birgitte J. Mayombana, Charles Mshinda, Hassan Utzinger, Jürg Vounatsou, Penelope PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Reagent strip to detect microhematuria as a proxy for Schistosoma haematobium infections has been considered an alternative to urine filtration for individual diagnosis and community-based estimates of treatment needs for preventive chemotherapy. However, the diagnostic accuracy of reagent strip needs further investigation, particularly at low infection intensity levels. METHODS: We used existing data from a study conducted in Tanzania that employed urine filtration and reagent strip testing for S. haematobium in two villages, including a baseline and six follow-up surveys after praziquantel treatment representing a wide range of infection prevalence. We developed a Bayesian model linking individual S. haematobium egg count data based on urine filtration to reagent strip binary test results available on multiple days and estimated the relation between infection intensity and sensitivity of reagent strip. Furthermore, we simulated data from 3,000 hypothetical populations with varying mean infection intensity to infer on the relation between prevalence observed by urine filtration and the interpretation of reagent strip readings. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Reagent strip showed excellent sensitivity even for single measurement reaching 100% at around 15 eggs of S. haematobium per 10 ml of urine when traces on reagent strip were considered positive. The corresponding specificity was 97%. When traces were considered negative, the diagnostic accuracy of the reagent strip was equivalent to urine filtration data obtained on a single day. A 10% and 50% urine filtration prevalence based on a single day sampling corresponds to 11.2% and 48.6% prevalence by reagent strip, respectively, when traces were considered negative, and 17.6% and 57.7%, respectively, when traces were considered positive. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Trace results should be included in reagent strip readings when high sensitivity is required, but excluded when high specificity is needed. The observed prevalence of reagent strip results, when traces are considered negative, is a good proxy for prevalence estimates of S. haematobium infection by urine filtration on a single day. Public Library of Science 2022-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9071146/ /pubmed/35468129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010332 Text en © 2022 Grolimund et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Grolimund, Carla M.
Bärenbold, Oliver
Hatz, Christoph F.
Vennervald, Birgitte J.
Mayombana, Charles
Mshinda, Hassan
Utzinger, Jürg
Vounatsou, Penelope
Infection intensity-dependent accuracy of reagent strip for the diagnosis of Schistosoma haematobium and estimation of treatment prevalence thresholds
title Infection intensity-dependent accuracy of reagent strip for the diagnosis of Schistosoma haematobium and estimation of treatment prevalence thresholds
title_full Infection intensity-dependent accuracy of reagent strip for the diagnosis of Schistosoma haematobium and estimation of treatment prevalence thresholds
title_fullStr Infection intensity-dependent accuracy of reagent strip for the diagnosis of Schistosoma haematobium and estimation of treatment prevalence thresholds
title_full_unstemmed Infection intensity-dependent accuracy of reagent strip for the diagnosis of Schistosoma haematobium and estimation of treatment prevalence thresholds
title_short Infection intensity-dependent accuracy of reagent strip for the diagnosis of Schistosoma haematobium and estimation of treatment prevalence thresholds
title_sort infection intensity-dependent accuracy of reagent strip for the diagnosis of schistosoma haematobium and estimation of treatment prevalence thresholds
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9071146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35468129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010332
work_keys_str_mv AT grolimundcarlam infectionintensitydependentaccuracyofreagentstripforthediagnosisofschistosomahaematobiumandestimationoftreatmentprevalencethresholds
AT barenboldoliver infectionintensitydependentaccuracyofreagentstripforthediagnosisofschistosomahaematobiumandestimationoftreatmentprevalencethresholds
AT hatzchristophf infectionintensitydependentaccuracyofreagentstripforthediagnosisofschistosomahaematobiumandestimationoftreatmentprevalencethresholds
AT vennervaldbirgittej infectionintensitydependentaccuracyofreagentstripforthediagnosisofschistosomahaematobiumandestimationoftreatmentprevalencethresholds
AT mayombanacharles infectionintensitydependentaccuracyofreagentstripforthediagnosisofschistosomahaematobiumandestimationoftreatmentprevalencethresholds
AT mshindahassan infectionintensitydependentaccuracyofreagentstripforthediagnosisofschistosomahaematobiumandestimationoftreatmentprevalencethresholds
AT utzingerjurg infectionintensitydependentaccuracyofreagentstripforthediagnosisofschistosomahaematobiumandestimationoftreatmentprevalencethresholds
AT vounatsoupenelope infectionintensitydependentaccuracyofreagentstripforthediagnosisofschistosomahaematobiumandestimationoftreatmentprevalencethresholds