Cargando…

Aortoiliac diameter and length in a healthy cohort

OBJECTIVE: Diameter is currently the only screening and diagnostic criterion for asymptomatic aneurysms. Therefore, aortic and lower-extremity arterial diameter has diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic importance. We aimed to determine aortic and lower-extremity arterial reference diameters in a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hyangkyoung, Kwon, Tae-Won, Choi, Eol, Jeong, Seonjeong, Kim, Hong-Kyu, Han, Youngjin, Cho, Yong-Pil, Yoon, Hyun-Ki, Choe, Jaewon, Kim, Won Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9071155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35511926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268077
_version_ 1784700790369157120
author Kim, Hyangkyoung
Kwon, Tae-Won
Choi, Eol
Jeong, Seonjeong
Kim, Hong-Kyu
Han, Youngjin
Cho, Yong-Pil
Yoon, Hyun-Ki
Choe, Jaewon
Kim, Won Hong
author_facet Kim, Hyangkyoung
Kwon, Tae-Won
Choi, Eol
Jeong, Seonjeong
Kim, Hong-Kyu
Han, Youngjin
Cho, Yong-Pil
Yoon, Hyun-Ki
Choe, Jaewon
Kim, Won Hong
author_sort Kim, Hyangkyoung
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Diameter is currently the only screening and diagnostic criterion for asymptomatic aneurysms. Therefore, aortic and lower-extremity arterial diameter has diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic importance. We aimed to determine aortic and lower-extremity arterial reference diameters in a general population and compare them according to age, sex, and other characteristics. METHODS: We evaluated consecutive 3,692 patients who underwent computed tomography as part of a general health checkup from 2015–2019 in a single tertiary center. Aortic and lower-extremity arterial diameters and the most important factor related to arterial diameters were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean diameter of the abdominal aorta was 17.490 ± 2.110 mm, while that of the common iliac artery was 10.851 ± 1.689 mm. The mean diameter of the abdominal aorta was 18.377 ± 1.766 mm in men and 15.884 ± 1.694 mm in women. Significant intersex differences were observed for all mean diameters and lengths. Multilinear regression analysis showed that age, sex, and body surface area impacted mean diameters of all measured sites except aorta and common iliac artery length. Between male and female patients matched for body surface area, there were significant intersex differences for all measured sites, except for common iliac artery length. CONCLUSIONS: The mean diameter of the abdominal aorta in this healthy cohort was 17.490 ± 2.110 mm overall, 18.377 ± 1.766 mm in men, and 15.884 ± 1.694 mm in women. Arterial diameter increased with male sex, older age, and increased body surface area, and aortic diameters were larger in men than in women with the same body surface area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9071155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90711552022-05-06 Aortoiliac diameter and length in a healthy cohort Kim, Hyangkyoung Kwon, Tae-Won Choi, Eol Jeong, Seonjeong Kim, Hong-Kyu Han, Youngjin Cho, Yong-Pil Yoon, Hyun-Ki Choe, Jaewon Kim, Won Hong PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Diameter is currently the only screening and diagnostic criterion for asymptomatic aneurysms. Therefore, aortic and lower-extremity arterial diameter has diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic importance. We aimed to determine aortic and lower-extremity arterial reference diameters in a general population and compare them according to age, sex, and other characteristics. METHODS: We evaluated consecutive 3,692 patients who underwent computed tomography as part of a general health checkup from 2015–2019 in a single tertiary center. Aortic and lower-extremity arterial diameters and the most important factor related to arterial diameters were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean diameter of the abdominal aorta was 17.490 ± 2.110 mm, while that of the common iliac artery was 10.851 ± 1.689 mm. The mean diameter of the abdominal aorta was 18.377 ± 1.766 mm in men and 15.884 ± 1.694 mm in women. Significant intersex differences were observed for all mean diameters and lengths. Multilinear regression analysis showed that age, sex, and body surface area impacted mean diameters of all measured sites except aorta and common iliac artery length. Between male and female patients matched for body surface area, there were significant intersex differences for all measured sites, except for common iliac artery length. CONCLUSIONS: The mean diameter of the abdominal aorta in this healthy cohort was 17.490 ± 2.110 mm overall, 18.377 ± 1.766 mm in men, and 15.884 ± 1.694 mm in women. Arterial diameter increased with male sex, older age, and increased body surface area, and aortic diameters were larger in men than in women with the same body surface area. Public Library of Science 2022-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9071155/ /pubmed/35511926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268077 Text en © 2022 Kim et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kim, Hyangkyoung
Kwon, Tae-Won
Choi, Eol
Jeong, Seonjeong
Kim, Hong-Kyu
Han, Youngjin
Cho, Yong-Pil
Yoon, Hyun-Ki
Choe, Jaewon
Kim, Won Hong
Aortoiliac diameter and length in a healthy cohort
title Aortoiliac diameter and length in a healthy cohort
title_full Aortoiliac diameter and length in a healthy cohort
title_fullStr Aortoiliac diameter and length in a healthy cohort
title_full_unstemmed Aortoiliac diameter and length in a healthy cohort
title_short Aortoiliac diameter and length in a healthy cohort
title_sort aortoiliac diameter and length in a healthy cohort
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9071155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35511926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268077
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhyangkyoung aortoiliacdiameterandlengthinahealthycohort
AT kwontaewon aortoiliacdiameterandlengthinahealthycohort
AT choieol aortoiliacdiameterandlengthinahealthycohort
AT jeongseonjeong aortoiliacdiameterandlengthinahealthycohort
AT kimhongkyu aortoiliacdiameterandlengthinahealthycohort
AT hanyoungjin aortoiliacdiameterandlengthinahealthycohort
AT choyongpil aortoiliacdiameterandlengthinahealthycohort
AT yoonhyunki aortoiliacdiameterandlengthinahealthycohort
AT choejaewon aortoiliacdiameterandlengthinahealthycohort
AT kimwonhong aortoiliacdiameterandlengthinahealthycohort