Cargando…
Aortoiliac diameter and length in a healthy cohort
OBJECTIVE: Diameter is currently the only screening and diagnostic criterion for asymptomatic aneurysms. Therefore, aortic and lower-extremity arterial diameter has diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic importance. We aimed to determine aortic and lower-extremity arterial reference diameters in a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9071155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35511926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268077 |
_version_ | 1784700790369157120 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Hyangkyoung Kwon, Tae-Won Choi, Eol Jeong, Seonjeong Kim, Hong-Kyu Han, Youngjin Cho, Yong-Pil Yoon, Hyun-Ki Choe, Jaewon Kim, Won Hong |
author_facet | Kim, Hyangkyoung Kwon, Tae-Won Choi, Eol Jeong, Seonjeong Kim, Hong-Kyu Han, Youngjin Cho, Yong-Pil Yoon, Hyun-Ki Choe, Jaewon Kim, Won Hong |
author_sort | Kim, Hyangkyoung |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Diameter is currently the only screening and diagnostic criterion for asymptomatic aneurysms. Therefore, aortic and lower-extremity arterial diameter has diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic importance. We aimed to determine aortic and lower-extremity arterial reference diameters in a general population and compare them according to age, sex, and other characteristics. METHODS: We evaluated consecutive 3,692 patients who underwent computed tomography as part of a general health checkup from 2015–2019 in a single tertiary center. Aortic and lower-extremity arterial diameters and the most important factor related to arterial diameters were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean diameter of the abdominal aorta was 17.490 ± 2.110 mm, while that of the common iliac artery was 10.851 ± 1.689 mm. The mean diameter of the abdominal aorta was 18.377 ± 1.766 mm in men and 15.884 ± 1.694 mm in women. Significant intersex differences were observed for all mean diameters and lengths. Multilinear regression analysis showed that age, sex, and body surface area impacted mean diameters of all measured sites except aorta and common iliac artery length. Between male and female patients matched for body surface area, there were significant intersex differences for all measured sites, except for common iliac artery length. CONCLUSIONS: The mean diameter of the abdominal aorta in this healthy cohort was 17.490 ± 2.110 mm overall, 18.377 ± 1.766 mm in men, and 15.884 ± 1.694 mm in women. Arterial diameter increased with male sex, older age, and increased body surface area, and aortic diameters were larger in men than in women with the same body surface area. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9071155 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-90711552022-05-06 Aortoiliac diameter and length in a healthy cohort Kim, Hyangkyoung Kwon, Tae-Won Choi, Eol Jeong, Seonjeong Kim, Hong-Kyu Han, Youngjin Cho, Yong-Pil Yoon, Hyun-Ki Choe, Jaewon Kim, Won Hong PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Diameter is currently the only screening and diagnostic criterion for asymptomatic aneurysms. Therefore, aortic and lower-extremity arterial diameter has diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic importance. We aimed to determine aortic and lower-extremity arterial reference diameters in a general population and compare them according to age, sex, and other characteristics. METHODS: We evaluated consecutive 3,692 patients who underwent computed tomography as part of a general health checkup from 2015–2019 in a single tertiary center. Aortic and lower-extremity arterial diameters and the most important factor related to arterial diameters were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean diameter of the abdominal aorta was 17.490 ± 2.110 mm, while that of the common iliac artery was 10.851 ± 1.689 mm. The mean diameter of the abdominal aorta was 18.377 ± 1.766 mm in men and 15.884 ± 1.694 mm in women. Significant intersex differences were observed for all mean diameters and lengths. Multilinear regression analysis showed that age, sex, and body surface area impacted mean diameters of all measured sites except aorta and common iliac artery length. Between male and female patients matched for body surface area, there were significant intersex differences for all measured sites, except for common iliac artery length. CONCLUSIONS: The mean diameter of the abdominal aorta in this healthy cohort was 17.490 ± 2.110 mm overall, 18.377 ± 1.766 mm in men, and 15.884 ± 1.694 mm in women. Arterial diameter increased with male sex, older age, and increased body surface area, and aortic diameters were larger in men than in women with the same body surface area. Public Library of Science 2022-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9071155/ /pubmed/35511926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268077 Text en © 2022 Kim et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kim, Hyangkyoung Kwon, Tae-Won Choi, Eol Jeong, Seonjeong Kim, Hong-Kyu Han, Youngjin Cho, Yong-Pil Yoon, Hyun-Ki Choe, Jaewon Kim, Won Hong Aortoiliac diameter and length in a healthy cohort |
title | Aortoiliac diameter and length in a healthy cohort |
title_full | Aortoiliac diameter and length in a healthy cohort |
title_fullStr | Aortoiliac diameter and length in a healthy cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Aortoiliac diameter and length in a healthy cohort |
title_short | Aortoiliac diameter and length in a healthy cohort |
title_sort | aortoiliac diameter and length in a healthy cohort |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9071155/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35511926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268077 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimhyangkyoung aortoiliacdiameterandlengthinahealthycohort AT kwontaewon aortoiliacdiameterandlengthinahealthycohort AT choieol aortoiliacdiameterandlengthinahealthycohort AT jeongseonjeong aortoiliacdiameterandlengthinahealthycohort AT kimhongkyu aortoiliacdiameterandlengthinahealthycohort AT hanyoungjin aortoiliacdiameterandlengthinahealthycohort AT choyongpil aortoiliacdiameterandlengthinahealthycohort AT yoonhyunki aortoiliacdiameterandlengthinahealthycohort AT choejaewon aortoiliacdiameterandlengthinahealthycohort AT kimwonhong aortoiliacdiameterandlengthinahealthycohort |