Cargando…

Interventions for Depressive Symptoms in People Living with Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses

OBJECTIVE: This review investigated the effectiveness of clinical interventions on depressive symptoms in people with all types of chronic pain. METHODS: We searched seven electronic databases and reference lists on September 15, 2020, and included English-language, systematic reviews and meta-analy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Darren K, Lai, Ka Sing Paris, Pico-Espinosa, Oscar Javier, Rice, Danielle B, Chung, Chadwick, Modarresi, Golale, Sud, Abhimanyu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9071227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34373915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnab248
_version_ 1784700806398738432
author Cheng, Darren K
Lai, Ka Sing Paris
Pico-Espinosa, Oscar Javier
Rice, Danielle B
Chung, Chadwick
Modarresi, Golale
Sud, Abhimanyu
author_facet Cheng, Darren K
Lai, Ka Sing Paris
Pico-Espinosa, Oscar Javier
Rice, Danielle B
Chung, Chadwick
Modarresi, Golale
Sud, Abhimanyu
author_sort Cheng, Darren K
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This review investigated the effectiveness of clinical interventions on depressive symptoms in people with all types of chronic pain. METHODS: We searched seven electronic databases and reference lists on September 15, 2020, and included English-language, systematic reviews and meta-analyses of trials that examined the effects of clinical interventions on depressive outcomes in chronic pain. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted, and assessed the risk of bias. PROSPERO registration: CRD42019131871. RESULTS: Eighty-three reviews were selected and included 182 meta-analyses. Data were summarized visually and narratively using standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals as the primary outcome of interest. A large proportion of meta-analyses investigated fibromyalgia or mixed chronic pain, and psychological interventions were most commonly evaluated. Acceptance and commitment therapy for general chronic pain, and fluoxetine and web-based psychotherapy for fibromyalgia showed the most robust effects and can be prioritized for implementation in clinical practice. Exercise for arthritis, pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain, self-regulatory psychotherapy for axial pain, and music therapy for general chronic pain showed large, significant effects, but estimates were derived from low- or critically low-quality reviews. CONCLUSIONS: No single intervention type demonstrated substantial superiority across multiple pain populations. Other dimensions beyond efficacy, such as accessibility, safety, cost, patient preference, and efficacy for non-depressive outcomes should also be weighed when considering treatment options. Further effectiveness research is required for common pain types such as arthritis and axial pain, and common interventions such as opioids, anti-inflammatories and acupuncture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9071227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90712272022-05-06 Interventions for Depressive Symptoms in People Living with Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses Cheng, Darren K Lai, Ka Sing Paris Pico-Espinosa, Oscar Javier Rice, Danielle B Chung, Chadwick Modarresi, Golale Sud, Abhimanyu Pain Med Psychology, Psychiatry, & Brain Neuroscience Section OBJECTIVE: This review investigated the effectiveness of clinical interventions on depressive symptoms in people with all types of chronic pain. METHODS: We searched seven electronic databases and reference lists on September 15, 2020, and included English-language, systematic reviews and meta-analyses of trials that examined the effects of clinical interventions on depressive outcomes in chronic pain. Two independent reviewers screened, extracted, and assessed the risk of bias. PROSPERO registration: CRD42019131871. RESULTS: Eighty-three reviews were selected and included 182 meta-analyses. Data were summarized visually and narratively using standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals as the primary outcome of interest. A large proportion of meta-analyses investigated fibromyalgia or mixed chronic pain, and psychological interventions were most commonly evaluated. Acceptance and commitment therapy for general chronic pain, and fluoxetine and web-based psychotherapy for fibromyalgia showed the most robust effects and can be prioritized for implementation in clinical practice. Exercise for arthritis, pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain, self-regulatory psychotherapy for axial pain, and music therapy for general chronic pain showed large, significant effects, but estimates were derived from low- or critically low-quality reviews. CONCLUSIONS: No single intervention type demonstrated substantial superiority across multiple pain populations. Other dimensions beyond efficacy, such as accessibility, safety, cost, patient preference, and efficacy for non-depressive outcomes should also be weighed when considering treatment options. Further effectiveness research is required for common pain types such as arthritis and axial pain, and common interventions such as opioids, anti-inflammatories and acupuncture. Oxford University Press 2021-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9071227/ /pubmed/34373915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnab248 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Psychology, Psychiatry, & Brain Neuroscience Section
Cheng, Darren K
Lai, Ka Sing Paris
Pico-Espinosa, Oscar Javier
Rice, Danielle B
Chung, Chadwick
Modarresi, Golale
Sud, Abhimanyu
Interventions for Depressive Symptoms in People Living with Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses
title Interventions for Depressive Symptoms in People Living with Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses
title_full Interventions for Depressive Symptoms in People Living with Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses
title_fullStr Interventions for Depressive Symptoms in People Living with Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses
title_full_unstemmed Interventions for Depressive Symptoms in People Living with Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses
title_short Interventions for Depressive Symptoms in People Living with Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review of Meta-Analyses
title_sort interventions for depressive symptoms in people living with chronic pain: a systematic review of meta-analyses
topic Psychology, Psychiatry, & Brain Neuroscience Section
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9071227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34373915
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnab248
work_keys_str_mv AT chengdarrenk interventionsfordepressivesymptomsinpeoplelivingwithchronicpainasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses
AT laikasingparis interventionsfordepressivesymptomsinpeoplelivingwithchronicpainasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses
AT picoespinosaoscarjavier interventionsfordepressivesymptomsinpeoplelivingwithchronicpainasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses
AT ricedanielleb interventionsfordepressivesymptomsinpeoplelivingwithchronicpainasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses
AT chungchadwick interventionsfordepressivesymptomsinpeoplelivingwithchronicpainasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses
AT modarresigolale interventionsfordepressivesymptomsinpeoplelivingwithchronicpainasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses
AT sudabhimanyu interventionsfordepressivesymptomsinpeoplelivingwithchronicpainasystematicreviewofmetaanalyses