Cargando…

Modern Learning from Big Data in Critical Care: Primum Non Nocere

Large and complex data sets are increasingly available for research in critical care. To analyze these data, researchers use techniques commonly referred to as statistical learning or machine learning (ML). The latter is known for large successes in the field of diagnostics, for example, by identifi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gravesteijn, Benjamin Y., Steyerberg, Ewout W., Lingsma, Hester F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9071245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01510-6
_version_ 1784700810874060800
author Gravesteijn, Benjamin Y.
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
Lingsma, Hester F.
author_facet Gravesteijn, Benjamin Y.
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
Lingsma, Hester F.
author_sort Gravesteijn, Benjamin Y.
collection PubMed
description Large and complex data sets are increasingly available for research in critical care. To analyze these data, researchers use techniques commonly referred to as statistical learning or machine learning (ML). The latter is known for large successes in the field of diagnostics, for example, by identification of radiological anomalies. In other research areas, such as clustering and prediction studies, there is more discussion regarding the benefit and efficiency of ML techniques compared with statistical learning. In this viewpoint, we aim to explain commonly used statistical learning and ML techniques and provide guidance for responsible use in the case of clustering and prediction questions in critical care. Clustering studies have been increasingly popular in critical care research, aiming to inform how patients can be characterized, classified, or treated differently. An important challenge for clustering studies is to ensure and assess generalizability. This limits the application of findings in these studies toward individual patients. In the case of predictive questions, there is much discussion as to what algorithm should be used to most accurately predict outcome. Aspects that determine usefulness of ML, compared with statistical techniques, include the volume of the data, the dimensionality of the preferred model, and the extent of missing data. There are areas in which modern ML methods may be preferred. However, efforts should be made to implement statistical frameworks (e.g., for dealing with missing data or measurement error, both omnipresent in clinical data) in ML methods. To conclude, there are important opportunities but also pitfalls to consider when performing clustering or predictive studies with ML techniques. We advocate careful valuation of new data-driven findings. More interaction is needed between the engineer mindset of experts in ML methods, the insight in bias of epidemiologists, and the probabilistic thinking of statisticians to extract as much information and knowledge from data as possible, while avoiding harm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12028-022-01510-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9071245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90712452022-05-06 Modern Learning from Big Data in Critical Care: Primum Non Nocere Gravesteijn, Benjamin Y. Steyerberg, Ewout W. Lingsma, Hester F. Neurocrit Care Big Data in Neurocritical Care Large and complex data sets are increasingly available for research in critical care. To analyze these data, researchers use techniques commonly referred to as statistical learning or machine learning (ML). The latter is known for large successes in the field of diagnostics, for example, by identification of radiological anomalies. In other research areas, such as clustering and prediction studies, there is more discussion regarding the benefit and efficiency of ML techniques compared with statistical learning. In this viewpoint, we aim to explain commonly used statistical learning and ML techniques and provide guidance for responsible use in the case of clustering and prediction questions in critical care. Clustering studies have been increasingly popular in critical care research, aiming to inform how patients can be characterized, classified, or treated differently. An important challenge for clustering studies is to ensure and assess generalizability. This limits the application of findings in these studies toward individual patients. In the case of predictive questions, there is much discussion as to what algorithm should be used to most accurately predict outcome. Aspects that determine usefulness of ML, compared with statistical techniques, include the volume of the data, the dimensionality of the preferred model, and the extent of missing data. There are areas in which modern ML methods may be preferred. However, efforts should be made to implement statistical frameworks (e.g., for dealing with missing data or measurement error, both omnipresent in clinical data) in ML methods. To conclude, there are important opportunities but also pitfalls to consider when performing clustering or predictive studies with ML techniques. We advocate careful valuation of new data-driven findings. More interaction is needed between the engineer mindset of experts in ML methods, the insight in bias of epidemiologists, and the probabilistic thinking of statisticians to extract as much information and knowledge from data as possible, while avoiding harm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12028-022-01510-6. Springer US 2022-05-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9071245/ /pubmed/35513752 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01510-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Big Data in Neurocritical Care
Gravesteijn, Benjamin Y.
Steyerberg, Ewout W.
Lingsma, Hester F.
Modern Learning from Big Data in Critical Care: Primum Non Nocere
title Modern Learning from Big Data in Critical Care: Primum Non Nocere
title_full Modern Learning from Big Data in Critical Care: Primum Non Nocere
title_fullStr Modern Learning from Big Data in Critical Care: Primum Non Nocere
title_full_unstemmed Modern Learning from Big Data in Critical Care: Primum Non Nocere
title_short Modern Learning from Big Data in Critical Care: Primum Non Nocere
title_sort modern learning from big data in critical care: primum non nocere
topic Big Data in Neurocritical Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9071245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35513752
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12028-022-01510-6
work_keys_str_mv AT gravesteijnbenjaminy modernlearningfrombigdataincriticalcareprimumnonnocere
AT steyerbergewoutw modernlearningfrombigdataincriticalcareprimumnonnocere
AT lingsmahesterf modernlearningfrombigdataincriticalcareprimumnonnocere