Cargando…

The limits of motivational influence in ADHD: no evidence for an altered reaction to negative reinforcement

Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies have reported a diminished response in the brain’s reward circuits to contingent cues predicting future monetary gain in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The situation with regard to monetary loss is less clear, despite r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Dessel, Jeroen, Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J S, Moerkerke, Matthijs, Van der Oord, Saskia, Morsink, Sarah, Lemiere, Jurgen, Danckaerts, Marina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9071417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34643738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab111
_version_ 1784700840732262400
author Van Dessel, Jeroen
Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J S
Moerkerke, Matthijs
Van der Oord, Saskia
Morsink, Sarah
Lemiere, Jurgen
Danckaerts, Marina
author_facet Van Dessel, Jeroen
Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J S
Moerkerke, Matthijs
Van der Oord, Saskia
Morsink, Sarah
Lemiere, Jurgen
Danckaerts, Marina
author_sort Van Dessel, Jeroen
collection PubMed
description Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies have reported a diminished response in the brain’s reward circuits to contingent cues predicting future monetary gain in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The situation with regard to monetary loss is less clear, despite recognition that both positive and negative consequences impact ADHD behaviour. Here, we employ a new Escape Monetary Loss Incentive task in an MRI scanner, which allows the differentiation of contingency and valence effects during loss avoidance, to examine ADHD-related alterations in monetary loss processing. There was no evidence of atypical processing of contingent or non-contingent monetary loss cues in ADHD — either in terms of ratings of emotional and motivational significance or brain responses. This suggests that the ability to process contingencies between performance and negative outcomes is intact in ADHD and that individuals with ADHD are no more (or less) sensitive to negative outcomes than controls. This latter finding stands in stark contrast to recent evidence from a similar task of atypical emotion network recruitment (e.g. amygdala) in ADHD individuals to cues predicting another negative event, the imposition of delay, suggesting marked specificity in the way they respond to negative events.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9071417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-90714172022-05-06 The limits of motivational influence in ADHD: no evidence for an altered reaction to negative reinforcement Van Dessel, Jeroen Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J S Moerkerke, Matthijs Van der Oord, Saskia Morsink, Sarah Lemiere, Jurgen Danckaerts, Marina Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Manuscript Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies have reported a diminished response in the brain’s reward circuits to contingent cues predicting future monetary gain in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The situation with regard to monetary loss is less clear, despite recognition that both positive and negative consequences impact ADHD behaviour. Here, we employ a new Escape Monetary Loss Incentive task in an MRI scanner, which allows the differentiation of contingency and valence effects during loss avoidance, to examine ADHD-related alterations in monetary loss processing. There was no evidence of atypical processing of contingent or non-contingent monetary loss cues in ADHD — either in terms of ratings of emotional and motivational significance or brain responses. This suggests that the ability to process contingencies between performance and negative outcomes is intact in ADHD and that individuals with ADHD are no more (or less) sensitive to negative outcomes than controls. This latter finding stands in stark contrast to recent evidence from a similar task of atypical emotion network recruitment (e.g. amygdala) in ADHD individuals to cues predicting another negative event, the imposition of delay, suggesting marked specificity in the way they respond to negative events. Oxford University Press 2021-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9071417/ /pubmed/34643738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab111 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Manuscript
Van Dessel, Jeroen
Sonuga-Barke, Edmund J S
Moerkerke, Matthijs
Van der Oord, Saskia
Morsink, Sarah
Lemiere, Jurgen
Danckaerts, Marina
The limits of motivational influence in ADHD: no evidence for an altered reaction to negative reinforcement
title The limits of motivational influence in ADHD: no evidence for an altered reaction to negative reinforcement
title_full The limits of motivational influence in ADHD: no evidence for an altered reaction to negative reinforcement
title_fullStr The limits of motivational influence in ADHD: no evidence for an altered reaction to negative reinforcement
title_full_unstemmed The limits of motivational influence in ADHD: no evidence for an altered reaction to negative reinforcement
title_short The limits of motivational influence in ADHD: no evidence for an altered reaction to negative reinforcement
title_sort limits of motivational influence in adhd: no evidence for an altered reaction to negative reinforcement
topic Original Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9071417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34643738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab111
work_keys_str_mv AT vandesseljeroen thelimitsofmotivationalinfluenceinadhdnoevidenceforanalteredreactiontonegativereinforcement
AT sonugabarkeedmundjs thelimitsofmotivationalinfluenceinadhdnoevidenceforanalteredreactiontonegativereinforcement
AT moerkerkematthijs thelimitsofmotivationalinfluenceinadhdnoevidenceforanalteredreactiontonegativereinforcement
AT vanderoordsaskia thelimitsofmotivationalinfluenceinadhdnoevidenceforanalteredreactiontonegativereinforcement
AT morsinksarah thelimitsofmotivationalinfluenceinadhdnoevidenceforanalteredreactiontonegativereinforcement
AT lemierejurgen thelimitsofmotivationalinfluenceinadhdnoevidenceforanalteredreactiontonegativereinforcement
AT danckaertsmarina thelimitsofmotivationalinfluenceinadhdnoevidenceforanalteredreactiontonegativereinforcement
AT vandesseljeroen limitsofmotivationalinfluenceinadhdnoevidenceforanalteredreactiontonegativereinforcement
AT sonugabarkeedmundjs limitsofmotivationalinfluenceinadhdnoevidenceforanalteredreactiontonegativereinforcement
AT moerkerkematthijs limitsofmotivationalinfluenceinadhdnoevidenceforanalteredreactiontonegativereinforcement
AT vanderoordsaskia limitsofmotivationalinfluenceinadhdnoevidenceforanalteredreactiontonegativereinforcement
AT morsinksarah limitsofmotivationalinfluenceinadhdnoevidenceforanalteredreactiontonegativereinforcement
AT lemierejurgen limitsofmotivationalinfluenceinadhdnoevidenceforanalteredreactiontonegativereinforcement
AT danckaertsmarina limitsofmotivationalinfluenceinadhdnoevidenceforanalteredreactiontonegativereinforcement